Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for extraSTORE

Channel

extraSTORE

@extra_stoore

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,587subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001359910057
TypeChannel
Username@extra_stoore
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/extra_stoore

Growth

11,58311,61311,5986 August 2026 — 11,613 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,613 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,612 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,609 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,612 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,608 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,603 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,604 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,608 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,611 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,613 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,607 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,606 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,604 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,603 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,596 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,597 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,595 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,594 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,588 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,584 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,583 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,589 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,587 subscribers11,5876 August 20264 September 2026
24 measurements spanning 29 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,579–11,618 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 23:1711,587-2
3 Sept 2026, 08:1611,589+6
2 Sept 2026, 04:1311,583-1
1 Sept 2026, 03:5811,584-4
31 Aug 2026, 06:5511,588-6
30 Aug 2026, 09:5711,594-1
29 Aug 2026, 10:0511,595-2
28 Aug 2026, 11:4411,597+1
27 Aug 2026, 09:5311,596-7
26 Aug 2026, 08:2611,603-1
25 Aug 2026, 09:3211,604-2
24 Aug 2026, 08:5711,606-1
22 Aug 2026, 18:5511,607-6
21 Aug 2026, 09:4811,613+2
19 Aug 2026, 14:5511,611+3
18 Aug 2026, 17:3611,608+4
16 Aug 2026, 22:2211,604+1
15 Aug 2026, 15:4411,603-5
14 Aug 2026, 05:1711,608-4
12 Aug 2026, 20:2311,612first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.7%
avg views ÷ 11,587 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held34 (30 June 20261 September 2026)
Views total17,584
Reactions total212
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
36s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

614 reactions across 34 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
58795.6%
👏274.40%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 614 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 14:00 UTC618 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🔵كثيراً ما تسبب غزارةً الأوراق البحثية إرهاقاً أثناء عملية البحث عن دليل علمي دقيق، فالأمر قد يكون أشبه بالبحث عن ابرة في كومة من القش.. هل هذه المشكلة عصيّة على الحلّ؟ كلّا، ففي عصرنا الحالي ليس هنالك مشكلة عصيّة على الحلّ! 🔹️إذا تريد مصدراً يعطيك فكرة سريعة عن "إجماع العلماء" حول سؤال معين.. 🔹️أو كنت تتمنّى وجود أداة ذكية تفهم سؤالك الطبي مباشرة، وتستخرج لك الإجابة من ملايين الدراسات الموثوقة في ثوانٍ، تابع معنا ه

14

31 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC775 views22 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🔵 هل تسبب لكَ غزارة الأوراق البحثية إرهاقاً وضياعاً، فتشعرُ أنَّ الأمر أشبه ببحث عن إبرة في كومة قشّ؟! إذا كنت تبحث عن مصدر يعطيك فكرة سريعة عن "إجماع العلماء" حول سؤال معين.. أو كنت تتمنّى وجود أداة ذكية تفهم سؤالك الطبي مباشرة، وتستخرج لك الإجابة من ملايين الدراسات الموثوقة في ثوانٍ ( وهي أمنية جميع الباحثين).. فالحلّ سيطرح هنا قريباً ❗️ 🔵 انتظروا البوست السادس من سلسلة extraRESEARCH غداً على الساعة الخامسة إن شا

22

28 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC≈1,310 views31 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

أنقذت آلاف الأرواح عندما تجرأت وقالت لا دخلت الدكتورة فرانسيس كيلسي مقر إدارة الغذاء والدواء (FDA) في يوم عملها الأول. كانت تبلغ من العمر 46 عاماً، عالمة في الصيدلة وتحمل شهادة في الطب، وواحدة من النساء القلائل في مجال تنظيم الأدوية الفيدرالي. سلمها مشرفوها ما بدا وكأنه مهمة روتينية بسيطة؛ إذ أرادت شركة أدوية عملاقة تُدعى "ريتشاردسون ميريل" الحصول على موافقة سريعة لعقار مهدئ جديد يُدعى "كيفادون". كانت المادة الفعا

31

27 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC≈1,290 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

انتظروا من extraSTORE قصة دواء تاليدومايد الذي تسبب بكارثة طبية عالمية .. وكيف كان ضمير صيدلانية موظفة في FDA له الفضل بإنقاذ الملايين منه غداً الجمعة الساعة 5 مساءً 📣 extraSTORE medical Resources Channel للإعلان على القناة

👏43

26 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC≈1,350 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🟢الانتحال (Plagiarism) في البحث العلمي.. إن كنت لا تدري فالمصيبةُ أعظمُ ! 🟢 سلسلة extraRESEARCH البوست السّادس 🟢 في عالم البحث العلمي، كثيراً ما نركّز على جودة البحث وحداثة الموضوع ومثاليته، لكن هناك "قاتلاً صامتاً" يهدد كل هذا الجهد في ثوانٍ: الانتحال العلمي (Plagiarism). المشكلة أن الكثيرين يقعون فيه عن غير قصد ويضيعون مستقبلهم البحثي، بسبب عدم المعرفة وقلة الوعي! 🟢 ما هو الانتحال العلمي ببساطة؟ هو استخدام أفكار

11👏3

25 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC≈1,010 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026

ملاحظة👆: خصمومات للمنضمين لقناة وكالة ريستر عبر الرابط التالي المخصص لمشتركين قناة extraSTORE ولمدة عشرة أيام من تاريخ النشر : https://t.me/RiesterAgency

2👏1

25 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC991 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @RiesterAgency

💡وكالة شركة ريستر الألمانية للادوات الطبية في دمشق🏨 _ نحرص دوما على تقديم الجودة المثلى بالسعر الأنسب مع الضمان (القناة مخصصة للأطباء وطلاب الطب) : 🔰سماعة الطبيب من ريستر 🔰 مقاييس ضغط بأنواعها 🔰 مقاييس أكسجة نبضي أوكسيمتر 🔰 مقياس سكر Yuwell ـ On Call® Plus 🔰 مقاييس حرارة 🔰 مطارق عصبية neurological hammers. 🔰Shoulder and neck massager 🔰 مناظير أذن OtoScope بأنواعها - رنانات - منظار قعر العين (كت رباعي ENT &

2👏1

22 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC≈1,620 views21 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ميزة جميلة في بعض المواقع الطبية منها Medscape و UpToDate وغيرها 📌 دراسة التداخل الدوائي 📝 اذا كان عندك مريض بياخذ عدة أدوية وبدك تعرف تداخلها أو انت عدّلت على لزومه الفموي وأضفت أدوية جديدة بس ما بدك يكون الها تأثير أو تداخل مع الأدوية السابقة فهذه الأداة تساعدك على معرفة التداخلات بين الأظوية سواء بالتأثير او بالاستقلاب او زيادة السمية او تقليل التاثير .... بتحط أسماء الأدوية المطلوبة متل موضح بالصور (الصور من

21

22 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC≈1,540 views21 reactionsread 3 September 2026

😤 نزلت Open Evidence بس ما اشتغل عندي وعذبني بإنشاء الحساب وحتى مع VPN ماعميشتغل بدايةً حابب ذكّر انو نشرنا على القناة بوستين عن أحد أهم أدوات الذكاء الاصطناعي الطبية Open Evidence : تعريف بالتطبيق وتفاصيله مقارنة بينه وبين chatGPT لكن باستفتاء سابق هون صوّت أكثر من 50% أن التطبيق ما اشتغل (صعوبة انشاء حساب - ما اشتغل رغم تشغيل VPN ) لذلك خبرونا بالتعليقات اذا حابين نحكي عن أدوات ذكاء اصطناعي طبية غيرو سهلة التسجي

21

21 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC≈1,520 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🌟 زملاءنا الأطباء… أهلاً بكم 🌿 بين ضغط المناوبات، ازدحام الإسعاف، وسرعة القرار السريري… أحياناً نحتاج مكاناً يجمع المعلومة المختصرة، الفهم العملي، والخطوة التالية بوضوح. لهذا أُنشئت هذه القناة. 🩺 ماذا ستجدون هنا؟ 🚑 حالات سريرية واقعية من الإسعاف والعيادة والعناية 🧠 تحليل سريري خطوة بخطوة: كيف نفكر؟ كيف نصل للتشخيص؟ 💊 تدبير علاجي واضح مبني على أحدث المراجع مثل UpToDate و Harrison’s 📚 مراجعات مركزة لأهم المواضيع ال

10

20 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈1,550 views40 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🟡 البرومبت الأفضل لعلاقة سلسة وموثوقة مع الذكاء الصناعي : part 2 🟡 🟡كل ما عليكم هو نسخ البرومبت، تعديل النص بين الأقواس [ .. ] بما يناسب محاضرتكم أو تخصصكم، ثم لصقه في أي أداة ذكاء صناعي (مثل ChatGPT، Gemini، Claude، Perplexity). النتائج ستكون دقيقة، خالية من الزوائد، وموفّرة لجهدكم ووقتكم. ☢️1. برومبت لتوليد أسئلة MCQ ⚠️هذا البرومبت يجعل الذكاء الصناعي يصمم أسئلة محترفة تحاكي أسئلة البورد الطبي، مع شرح للإجابات

40

20 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC≈1,570 views21 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🟡 البرومبت الأفضل لعلاقة سلسة وموثوقة مع الذكاء الصناعي Part : 2 انطلاقاً من أهميّة الذكاء الصناعي المتزايدة في الدراسة والعمل وتحسين جودة الإنجاز (عند استخدامه بشكل صحيح)، نكمل معكم بهذه السلسلة التي تجعل التعامل مع ال AI أسهل واكثر دقّة.. ⏰ انتظرونا اليوم الساعة ٧ مساءً على قناة extraSTORE ببوست جديد.. 📣 extarSTORE Medical Resources Channel

21

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @extra_stoore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@extra_stoore edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Jul 2026, 19:31 UTCAnonymous Quiz130 voters

للمهتمين بالبحث العلمي.. اللي عددكن اكثر من 230 متابع حسب استبيان سابق احزروا شو البوست القادم ..

  1. البوست الرابع من سلسلة extraRESEARCH7%
  2. مصادر دراسات cross-sectional10%
  3. بوست عن مصادر البحث العلمي13%
  4. كل ما سبق صحيح 🙄70%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ملفات الماني للدكتوره لين
@german90gooo · 31,451
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
Dopamine Clinical
@Dopamine_Clinical2025 · 55,998
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“extraSTORE” (@extra_stoore), 11,587 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/extra_stoore.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.