Posted without readable text

Channel
أدوات وأخبار الذكاء الاصطناعي | AI Tools & News
@fa_tv
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
31,059subscribers
-1,774 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001868913917 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fa_tv |
| Description | تعرف على كل ما يتعلق بالذكاء الاصطناعي، بالإضافة إلى آخر الأخبار والأدوات الحديثة. |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 45 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fa_tv |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:55 | 31,059 | -25 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:19 | 31,084 | -26 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 20:26 | 31,110 | -18 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 22:56 | 31,128 | -22 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 20:55 | 31,150 | -26 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 22:04 | 31,176 | -26 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 23:30 | 31,202 | -26 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 18:18 | 31,228 | -99 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 03:56 | 31,327 | -100 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 22:56 | 31,427 | -142 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 16:40 | 31,569 | -265 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 31,834 | -71 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 31,905 | -30 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 31,935 | -48 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 31,983 | -43 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 32,026 | -88 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:15 | 32,114 | -65 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 16:01 | 32,179 | -40 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:55 | 32,219 | -15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:35 | 32,234 | first reading |
Engagement
402 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 143 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.434%
- avg views ÷ 31,059 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 135
- 172 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.10%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 172
- of 402 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 47 of 172 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 402 (5 August 2026 – 20 October 2026) |
| Views total | 23,208 |
| Reactions total | 76 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Oct 2026, 01:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈7,450
- Videos
- ≈1,760
- Links
- ≈2,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 9m 55s
- Average length
- 25s
Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
116 reactions across 71 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 82 | 70.7% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 15.5% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 11.2% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 1.72% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.862% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 86 of the 402 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 402 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 20 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
GatGPT.. يصمم الأسلحة! كشف الناشط الأمريكي كودي ويلسون (Cody Wilson) عن نموذج ذكاء اصطناعي متخصص يُدعى GatGPT، يُقال إنه قادر على المساعدة في تصميم أسلحة نارية قابلة للطباعة ثلاثية الأبعاد. واستُخدم النموذج في تصميم مسدس من عيار 0.22 أُطلق عليه اسم WASP والمثير في الموضوع هو فكرة GatGPT الذي دُرّب بتخصص على ملفات وتصاميم أسلحة رقمية ويعمل دون القيود التي تضعها نماذج مثل ChatGPT وGemini
فضيحة TikTok كشفت إفادات موظفين سابقين في TikTok، أن فرق السلامة حذّرت الإدارة من استغلال قاصرين عبر البث المباشر والهدايا الرقمية. وأظهر تحقيق داخلي ظهور أطفال بين 13 و15 عامًا في 112 ألف بث خلال يناير 2022، من دون أن يعني ذلك أن جميعها احتوت استغلالًا. باختصار قدموا الفائدة على السلامة لأن نظام الهدايا يحول التفاعل إلى أموال، ولو تم منع الاستغلال عبر البث راح تتوقف الإيرادات الناتجة من المحتوى المخالف
عاجل… عطل في خدمات Google Cloud بأوروبا (منطقة لندن) بسبب حدث كهربائي في أحد مراكز البيانات. أثر على عدة بنوك وتطبيقات ومواقع، من بينها: •Revolut (مشاكل في المدفوعات والتحويلات والسحب) •Lloyds Bank وHSBC وHalifax •Royal Mail وDPD وRightmove •خدمات أخرى تعتمد على المنطقة السحابية نفسها الخدمات بدأت في التعافي تدريجياً، وأعلنت جوجل أن الحدث الكهربائي تم التعامل معه.
تختصر الكثير… ومن يعي ما فيها يعرف ماذا يعني تصميم التفكير للتفاعل / الحوار مع النماذج اللغوية التوليدية الأداة تعمس عقل من يحاورها (نحن نصمم عملية الافكير بيننا وبين النموذج اللغوي)
إحدى شرائح العرض التقديمي التي قدمتها اليوم في محاضرة… تختصر الكثير… ومن يعي ما فيها يعرف ماذا يعني تصميم التفكير للتفاعل / الحوار مع النماذج اللغوية التوليدية
إحدى شرائح العرض التقديمي التي قدمتها اليوم في محاضرة… تختصر الكثير… ومن يعي ما فيها يعرف ماذا يعني تصميم التفكير للتفاعل / الحوار مع النماذج اللغوية التوليدية
ل له: "قيّم فكرتي بموضوعية، ولا توافقني لمجرد أنني صاحبها. وضّح أخطائي، واذكر الأدلة التي قد تثبت أنني مخطئ"
معلومة مهمه لمستخدمي الذكاء الاصطناعي في دراسة حديثة بعنوان Big-Big-SycoBench اختبر الباحثون 10 نماذج ذكاء اصطناعي باستخدام 5,400 حجة، لمعرفة ما إذا كانت النماذج تغيّر إجاباتها بناءً على قوة الأدلة، أم لمجرد إرضاء المستخدم. كشفت نتائج مهمة لكل من يستخدم ChatGPT أو غيره من أدوات الذكاء الاصطناعي: عندما واجهت النماذج حجج غير صحيحة أو ضغوط غير مبررة من المستخدمين، كانت نسبة مسايرتها كالتالي: GPT-4o نحو 95% GPT-5 نح…
طلب أحد الاخوة شرح مبسط لعمل وكيل الذكاء الاصطناعي وقلت اسوي له فيديو وارسله له واستخدمت Claude Code واستخدمت Codex واعطيتهم نفس الـ Prompt وهذه النتيجة اعتقد هذه الفيديوهات (كانت) متعبه في انشائها واليوم Claude أخذ حوالي 17 دقيقة، أما Codex حوالي 8 دقائق و Claude يفوز
أفلست CharacterAI بعد 5 سنوات فقط السبب قضايا قانونية وتحقيقات حكومية تتهم روبوتاتها بتشجيع المراهقين على إيذاء النفس والانتحار، بالإضافة إلى خسائر شهرية تتراوح بين 8-9 ملايين دولار بسبب تكاليف الحوسبة العالية التي لم تغطها الاشتراكات والإعلانات، وفقدان مؤسسيها لصالح Google وكشفت وثائق قضائية عن اتفاق بين Disney CharacterAI، يسمح بانتقال غالبية العاملين (60 على الأقل) إلى Disney وتُقدّر الرواتب والتعويضات السنوية ل…
من المسؤول عن وكلاء AI في المؤسسة؟ تقرير جديد نشرته Axios يسلط الضوء على فجوة إدارية متنامية داخل الشركات: من المسؤول عن وكلاء الذكاء الاصطناعي الذين ينفذون المهام بشكل مستقل؟ وفق Gartner، فقط 38% من كبار مسؤولي الموارد البشرية وتقنية المعلومات لديهم فهم متوافق لتأثير الذكاء الاصطناعي على مستقبل العمل. وكشفت بيانات Cloud Security Alliance أن 82% من المؤسسات رصدت خلال العام الماضي وكلاء ذكاء اصطناعي لم تكن تعلم بوج…
Showing the 12 most recent of 402 posts we hold for @fa_tv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@fa_tv edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 16 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 5 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@YE_QO · 54,1042 postsWallpapers Pro - خلفيات جوال
@photo_ra · 50,1202 postsاقتراحات افلام، توصيات مسلسلات
@AFlam_ra · 101,3071 postتعليم اللغة الانجليزية
@Einglish_ra · 87,0931 postروحانية ❤️
@L_l2_L · 7,0431 postاحدث البرامج 📲
@New_Programs · 10,0071 post♻️ علم النفس ♻️ تطوير الذات
@TV11AR · 141,6851 postفيديوهات
@Video_ra · 355,0791 postعالم الرجال
@Words_Men · 116,7851 postالعاب وتطبيقات مدفوعة
@h_tuf · 89,7331 postرسائل حب ، حبيبتي ، حبيبي
@ln_tv · 95,4751 post🎧 اغاني جديدة 🎧
@songs_ra · 6,2101 postغيمة خير
@tg2ra · 91,6061 postبوتات ربيع | Bots Rabie 🤖
@tg_rabie · 113,7041 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@lrnai · 27,919#1
@pyt_ar · 10,604#2
@AIfor1Designers · 10,081#3
@ma_net1 · 14,020#4
@lrn_tech · 40,145#5
@AI_Insights1 · 9,202#6
@AItaker · 14,874#7
@Art0051 · 2,039#8
@Ai_Arabic1 · 59,088#9
@AI_Tools24 · 5,126#10
@mohamedansary1 · 18,645#11
@ff313n · 28,707#12
@TV11AR · 141,685#13
@cryptomab · 11,335#14
@Technoapp11 · 60,655#15
@techwd · 27,166#16
@siralkhulud · 14,388#17
@soul_e111 · 22,381#18
@yassertgnya · 3,450#19
@Y8B78 · 29,059 (as read 5 September 2026)#20
@Harof_baakaiy · 13,890#21
@Arabicwhalesnews · 15,245#22
@USF_FCIT_BOOKS · 1,996#23
@pro_st_ru_ab_o · 12,044#24
@aqweeb · 22,498#25
@oBarmej · 228,072#26
@pdfxbookx · 14,132#27
@BoqashEcon · 38,654#28
@Fatean94 · 28,482#29
@AiAi_23 · 13,384#30
@zaamylovez2024 · 4,819#31
@Network_Cybeer · 19,261#32
@salmandesigne · 307#33
@a26_28w · 17,128#34
@minibookpdf · 9,296#35
@otcuc0 · 7,674#36
@SAMMRAH_Q · 26,086#37
@bookslib_arabic · 19,570#38
@amelyblah · 22,999#39
@Muhammad_078848 · 4,888#40
@Rahik9 · 13,328#41
@lmnxzl · 17,876#42
@NNL78 · 12,841#43
@Oi_xxl · 80,158#44
@lm_IlI · 21,793#45
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@lrnai · 27,919
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 11 September 2026
@h_tuf · 89,733
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 16 August 2026
@SAMMRAH_Q · 26,086
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 11 September 2026
@AFlam_ra · 101,307
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 17 August 2026
@B0Ok_MB · 38,863
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 30 August 2026
@arabes1 · 21,976
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 23 September 2026
@Ai_Arabic1 · 59,088
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
@soul_e111 · 22,381
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 19 September 2026
@iiiollll · 21,338
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 22 September 2026
@samraa23 · 21,257
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 22 September 2026
@Etr_MB · 111,574
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@knowledgeworldc · 60,272
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
@techwd · 27,166
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 September 2026
@Video_ra · 355,079
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
@Mbagdad · 25,236
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 September 2026
@XGHHH · 119,420
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
@Fatean94 · 28,482
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 8 September 2026
@amelyblah · 22,999
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 September 2026
@Ali_aa8o · 84,679
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 August 2026
@am_ywrfd · 23,070
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 September 2026
@TV11AR · 141,685
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
@sse5a · 62,304
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 August 2026
@Words_Men · 116,785
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 14 August 2026
@bookslib_arabic · 19,570
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 2 October 2026
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أدوات وأخبار الذكاء الاصطناعي | AI Tools & News” (@fa_tv), 31,059 subscribers as measured 20 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fa_tv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.