Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IQ | Наука и Факты

Channel

IQ | Наука и Факты

@factax

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,962subscribers

-94 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001741515535
TypeChannel
Username@factax
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/factax

Growth

6,9627,0567,0097 August 2026 — 7,056 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,055 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,046 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,034 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,026 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,019 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,006 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,001 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,990 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,973 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,962 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 29 days, net -94. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,948–7,070 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 23:376,962-11
1 Sept 2026, 22:036,973-17
29 Aug 2026, 23:256,990-11
26 Aug 2026, 16:037,001-5
23 Aug 2026, 23:037,006-13
20 Aug 2026, 13:147,019-7
17 Aug 2026, 23:537,026-8
14 Aug 2026, 22:287,034-12
11 Aug 2026, 06:257,046-9
8 Aug 2026, 04:557,055-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:167,056first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 17 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.52%
avg views ÷ 6,962 subscribers
Avg views / post
384
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held47 (17 April 202619 August 2026)
Views total10,754
Reactions total429
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 02:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

824 reactions across 47 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥17321.0%
15919.3%
😁8810.7%
💋495.95%
🤔495.95%
👍384.61%
👀364.37%
👏334.00%
🤣303.64%
🗿222.67%
💘192.31%
😢161.94%
🥰161.94%
🤩141.70%
😱121.46%
🎉111.33%
🐳111.33%
🤯91.09%
70.85%
40.485%
13 further kinds283.40%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 824 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 47 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @factax. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 47 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 April 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC127 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Медведи и панды не могут переносить алкоголь

1

19 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC192 views12 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

В мире больше искусственных фламинго, чем настоящих

😁9🔥21

18 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC245 views15 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

50 Cent однажды купил половину билетов на концерт, чтобы его соперник выступал перед полупустым залом

😁11😎3🔥1

18 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC266 views16 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Дельфины рождаются с усами, но с возрастом усы исчезают

🐳10🔥2🥰21😁1

17 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC296 views17 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Мультсериал «Маша и медведь» стал самым востребованным в мире

11👍2😁2🔥1😍1

17 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC313 views10 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Табакокурение является причиной обвисшей груди

💋6👀21🍓1

16 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC330 views17 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Во время Второй мировой войны дельфинов обучили искать бомбы под водой, но когда их выпустили, они просто уплыли

😁122👍2🔥1

16 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC365 views14 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

У пиявок 32 мозга

🗿7😱3👀1🔥1🤡1🤯1

15 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC382 views15 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

В Австралии есть город, всё население которого живёт под землёй

10👍2🔥2👀1

15 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC381 views14 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Кошки могут прыгать в 6 раз длиннее своего тела

🔥82🥰2😁2

14 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC407 views11 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

По статистике курящие девушки занимаются сексом в 2 раза чаще

5💋3👍1💯1🔥1

14 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC425 views20 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

У пауков очень слабая нервная система. Они могут умереть от страха

9😢4😁2👀1👍1🔥1🤔1🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @factax. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Эрудит
@Braintorn · 38,744
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 31 August 2026
Интересные факты
@interesnie_fac · 155,121
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 12 August 2026
Книга Знаний
@book_know · 72,831
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
Знаток
@znatok · 78,757
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
Интересный уголок
@poznavation · 34,208
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 3 September 2026
География в опросах
@geografiyatg · 49,693
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
Увлекательные задачки! Ребусы и головоломки.
@golovorebus · 57,825
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IQ | Наука и Факты” (@factax), 6,962 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/factax.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.