Posted without readable text

Channel
Мозговой штурм - загадки и викторины
@TriviaGames
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,516subscribers
-663 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002013387949 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TriviaGames |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 45 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TriviaGames |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:26 | 23,516 | -22 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 19:56 | 23,538 | -16 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:58 | 23,554 | -10 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:18 | 23,564 | -17 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 21:35 | 23,581 | -13 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 00:10 | 23,594 | -16 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 21:30 | 23,610 | -11 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 15:21 | 23,621 | -62 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 17:57 | 23,683 | -90 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 10:14 | 23,773 | -69 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 23,842 | -113 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 22:17 | 23,955 | -17 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 23,972 | -52 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 24,024 | -27 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 24,051 | +55 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 23,996 | +27 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 23,969 | -42 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 24,011 | -29 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:08 | 24,040 | -37 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:33 | 24,077 | first reading |
Engagement
202 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 126 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.44%
- avg views ÷ 23,516 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,280
- 86 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 86
- of 202 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 202 (1 August 2026 – 20 October 2026) |
| Views total | 110,102 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Oct 2026, 07:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Из какой сферы деятельности появился фразеологизм «положить зубы на полку»?
Как в Древней Руси называлось согласие родителей невесты на брак с молодым человеком?
- Упой16%
- Припой37%
- Удой19%
- Запой27%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Психологический тест! Который расскажет о вашем характере. Что вы увидели первым? 👇
Что извергает вулкан, называемый учёными «сальза»?
- Жидкую грязь33%
- Силикатную массу26%
- Базальтовые осколки25%
- Расплавленный металл16%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 202 posts we hold for @TriviaGames. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 29 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как в Древней Руси называлось согласие родителей невесты на брак с молодым человеком?
- Упой16%
- Припой37%
- Удой19%
- Запой27%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что извергает вулкан, называемый учёными «сальза»?
- Жидкую грязь33%
- Силикатную массу26%
- Базальтовые осколки25%
- Расплавленный металл16%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
По какому признаку, согласно латинской пословице, узнают льва?
- По голосу23%
- По зубам11%
- По гриве58%
- По когтям7%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Согласно какой шкале температур
- Фаренгейта18%
- Кельвина7%
- Цельсия71%
- Реомюра4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как в международном праве называются лица, входящие в состав вооруженных сил и непосредственно участвующие в военных действиях
- Коллаборационисты31%
- Коммандисты13%
- Герусии4%
- Комбатанты52%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какая рок-группа названа в честь дихлордифенилтрихлорметилметана?
- Коррозия металла24%
- AC/DC11%
- Металлика7%
- ДДТ58%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 202 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 20 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Braintorn · 38,204#1
@shock_facts05 · 11,399#2
@geografiyatg · 49,448#3
@facts_divo · 9,168#4
@discovery_club · 15,432#5
@naayyka · 16,184#6
@interesnyefacty_wau · 5,537#7
@factumtg · 5,611#8
@fakts_seeker · 8,063#9
@paketfactov · 1,414#10
@voprosneyroset · 7,876#11
@misochkatarot · 2,636#12
@znatwse · 3,780#13
@UssrQuiz · 404#14
@znatok · 78,648#15
@smartest_oprosi · 23,866#16
@opros_nook · 26#17
@Best_Citats · 14,085#18
@uznai_history · 24,132#19
@factax · 6,872#20
@golovorebus · 56,927#21
@poznavation · 33,520#22
@opros_and_fact · 2,800#23
@opros_ploshad · 2,141#24
@goodd_ideass · 6,036#25
@tsitatyf · 64,368#26
@mumessei1 · 4,108#27
@nezznal · 8,725#28
@interesnie_fac · 154,452#29
@umopros · 2,495#30
@ussr091 · 4,907#31
@interesnycanal · 12,222#32
@udifaktom · 7,028#33
@interesen_fact · 13,894#34
@znatok_geo · 7,194#35
@kakoives · 1,898#36
@book_know · 71,494#37
@pravda_nepravda · 27,536#38
@Razumnaya_Volna · 2,204#39
@scary_facts11 · 182,785#40
@kakoirost · 1,723#41
@tepznau · 3,154#42
@AmazingFakts100 · 3,054#43
@bioritmy · 2,168#44
@todayyoulearn · 4,914#45
@ya_znayu2 · 5,637#46
@interes_quiz · 2,278#47
@opros_int · 6,977#48
@kostyaenot87 · 2,166#49
@a_necdot69 · 134,451#50
@WFactsetss · 3,743#51
@herdakfaktov · 5,062#52
@astrologyyours · 42,487#53
@vashemneniee · 3,200#54
@stol_s_discysiyamy · 3,213#55
@psixologia18 · 34,549#56
@oprosivseznaika · 7,803#57
@factomirr · 2,074#58
@Gennious · 16,172#59
@IIHistorys · 13,069#60
@dayfakt · 8,307#61
@in_factos · 4,636#62
@mosaic_of_knowledge · 2,795#63
@vokryv_tehno · 572#64
@veryu_ne_veryu · 8,645#65
@topoprosn · 6,608#66
@yvlekatelnaya_labaratorya · 4,166#67
@peizagipriroda · 2,230#68
@ussr_quiz · 14,961#69
@Citaty_M · 167,545#70
@truth_and_fake · 3,106#71
@vne_marshryt · 1,197#72
@chpch3 · 27,003#73
@viktorinaOprosovna · 1,949#74
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Braintorn · 38,204
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 31 August 2026
@golovorebus · 56,927
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
@geografiyatg · 49,448
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
@smartest_oprosi · 23,866
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 September 2026
@uznai_history · 24,132
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 September 2026
@tsitatyf · 64,368
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 21 August 2026
@poznavation · 33,520
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 3 September 2026
@znaika_fact · 18,527
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 September 2026
@chpch0 · 32,657
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 4 September 2026
@chpch2 · 28,581
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 8 September 2026
@znatok · 78,648
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
@ho4y_vse_znat · 18,718
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 October 2026
@psixologia18 · 34,549
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 2 September 2026
@a_necdot69 · 134,451
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 13 August 2026
@interesnie_fac · 154,452
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 12 August 2026
@chpch3 · 27,003
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 10 September 2026
@book_know · 71,494
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
@pravda_nepravda · 27,536
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 9 September 2026
@divo_planeta · 21,591
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 22 September 2026
@ensiklofakt · 20,961
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 25 September 2026
@so_smislomtg · 61,510
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026
@astrologyyours · 42,487
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 28 August 2026
@history_0x · 42,721
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
@psikhologiak · 64,998
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мозговой штурм - загадки и викторины” (@TriviaGames), 23,516 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TriviaGames.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.