Posted without readable text

Channel
ФАКТЫ +🎭
@shock_facts05
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,411subscribers
-91 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001810341380 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shock_facts05 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shock_facts05 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:56 | 11,411 | -17 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 11,428 | -25 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:55 | 11,453 | -8 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 11,461 | +3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 11,458 | -19 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 20:59 | 11,477 | -11 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 11,488 | +8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:35 | 11,480 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 11,484 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 11,494 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 11,504 | -17 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 11,521 | +13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 11,508 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 11,514 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 11,512 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 11,515 | -27 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 11,542 | +23 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:06 | 11,519 | -19 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 11,538 | -11 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 11,549 | first reading |
Engagement
327 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.81%
- avg views ÷ 11,411 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 435
- 133 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.03%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 133
- of 327 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 119 of 133 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 327 (5 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 57,830 |
| Reactions total | 1,585 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 23:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1h 11m
- Average length
- 24s
Measured directly from 180 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,961 reactions across 297 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,362 | 34.4% | |
| ❤ | 1,259 | 31.8% | |
| 🔥 | 1,248 | 31.5% | |
| 🤔 | 37 | 0.934% | |
| 😁 | 23 | 0.581% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 0.151% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 0.101% | |
| 🤗 | 4 | 0.101% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.101% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 0.076% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.05% | |
| 😨 | 2 | 0.05% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.05% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.025% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.025% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.025% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.025% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.025% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 297 of the 327 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,961 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 327 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
⭐️ Бурдж-Халифа стал самым высоким зданием мира в 2007 году и до сих пор удерживает этот статус. Высота - 828 м, 163 этажа.☀️🔥👍 Наш канал в MAX 👉 Подпишись
🔥7❤5👍3
Posted without readable text
Потрясающая техника водного щита от пожарных, которая защищает спасателей от огненных взрывов. Наш канал в MAX 👉 Подпишись
🔥5👍4❤1
😱 Когда врач сказал: «У вас двойня»… Я пришла на УЗИ, легла на кушетку и приготовилась слушать привычное «всё в порядке». Врач молча водила датчиком по животу и вдруг будничным голосом произнесла: — У вас двойня. ДВОЙНЯ?! В этот момент я перестала слышать всё вокруг. В голове пронеслось: «Как двойня? Чья двойня? Что с ней делать? Смогу ли я понравиться им обоим? А если они закричат одновременно, как себя вести?» …
❤5👍4🔥4
Интересная механическая монета, которая также работает как держатель колец. Наш канал в MAX 👉 Подпишись
👍10🔥4❤1
Posted without readable text
Если владеть знаниями, то можно даже расколоть 20 тонный камень простой кувалдой. Наш канал в MAX 👉 Подпишись
🔥9👍7❤2
Хотела скрыть беременность от мужа. У нас уже есть дочь, плюс мой сын от первого брака - но он хотел еще. Следил за моим циклом, питанием, копил деньги. Забота превратилась в манию, и он даже начал меня пугать. Что еще хуже - я не хотела детей вообще. Когда увидела две полоски, молча пошла делать аборт, срок ~5 недель. Выбрала день, когда муж 100% будет на работе, сама взяла отгул, никто не знал, даже близкие подруг…
🔥6👍5❤3
🌊 Слияние двух рек в Индии Из за плотности вода не смешивается Наш канал в MAX 👉 Подпишись
❤8👍6🔥5
🇹🇷 Волшебная ночь в Анталии Наш канал в MAX 👉 Подпишись
👍7❤3🔥3
😱 «Аня, открой дверь!» — последнее, что я успел сказать… Кофе из бумажного стаканчика уже не бодрит. Впереди тьма и трасса, 50 километров до дома. Представляю, как Аня суетится на кухне — ждёт меня, улыбается, укладывает волосы. Месяц разлуки — и вот, наконец, возвращаюсь. Фары из темноты — и вдруг в меня несётся фура. Крик, удар, тьма. …Но вот я уже стою во дворе. Машина цела, ночь — как будто впитала звук. Тольк…
👍11❤5🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 327 posts we hold for @shock_facts05. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@anonimkarassks · 1,0432 postsИнтересно Знать
@brain177 · 2702 postsБольно, но правда
@bolnopravda · 1,2041 postВесёлая жизнь | юмор
@dDHEBHNK · 4,9381 post📖 ФАКТОР ЗНАНИЙ 📖
@factorzn · 7,6901 postЖитейские истории
@genistorii · 16,2331 postИстории по-женски
@istiriipojenski · 9,3641 postЛюблю читать 📕
@love_read_book · 5,5441 postПочитаем
@pochitaem100 · 2,5841 postРадость жизни
@prosto_kultura · 5,1371 post~Истории на ночь~
@scarybedtime_stories · 8,9111 postТараканы в голове 🤷♀
@TarakannVgolove · 1,1081 postЖиви, Люби, Мечтай
@zivi_lybi · 1,0721 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@TriviaGames · 23,955
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 September 2026
@pravda_nepravda · 28,529
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 9 September 2026
@poznavation · 33,996
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 3 September 2026
@znatok · 78,738
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
@Braintorn · 38,540
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 31 August 2026
@smartest_oprosi · 24,091
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 September 2026
@geografiyatg · 49,648
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
@divo_planeta · 21,790
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 22 September 2026
@zhenskii_yumor · 46,029
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 27 August 2026
@book_know · 72,387
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
@scary_facts11 · 184,683
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
@chpch3 · 27,389
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 10 September 2026
@uznai_history · 24,421
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 September 2026
@interesnie_fac · 154,662
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 12 August 2026
@a_necdot69 · 136,382
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 13 August 2026
@domanpm · 59,547
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 23 August 2026
@znaika_fact · 29,726
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 September 2026
@overhearstar · 43,203
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
@chpch0 · 33,123
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ФАКТЫ +🎭” (@shock_facts05), 11,411 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shock_facts05.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.