Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ФАКТЫ +🎭

Channel

ФАКТЫ +🎭

@shock_facts05

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,411subscribers

-91 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001810341380
TypeChannel
Username@shock_facts05
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shock_facts05

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,41111,61911,5157 August 2026 — 11,502 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,525 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,544 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,545 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,529 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,579 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,619 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,591 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,579 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,582 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,564 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,549 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,538 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,519 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,542 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,515 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,512 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,514 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,508 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,521 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,504 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,494 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,484 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,480 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,488 subscribers7 September 2026 — 11,477 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11,458 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,461 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,453 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,428 subscribers18 September 2026 — 11,411 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net -91. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,380–11,650 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 04:5611,411-17
16 Sept 2026, 01:1811,428-25
14 Sept 2026, 09:5511,453-8
12 Sept 2026, 22:3811,461+3
10 Sept 2026, 22:3811,458-19
7 Sept 2026, 20:5911,477-11
3 Sept 2026, 04:1811,488+8
2 Sept 2026, 00:3511,480-4
1 Sept 2026, 00:1811,484-10
30 Aug 2026, 20:2411,494-10
29 Aug 2026, 19:2711,504-17
28 Aug 2026, 16:5411,521+13
27 Aug 2026, 18:1811,508-6
26 Aug 2026, 14:4311,514+2
25 Aug 2026, 14:3511,512-3
24 Aug 2026, 15:2511,515-27
22 Aug 2026, 23:0511,542+23
21 Aug 2026, 12:0611,519-19
20 Aug 2026, 11:3711,538-11
19 Aug 2026, 12:0211,549first reading

Engagement

327 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.81%
avg views ÷ 11,411 subscribers
Avg views / post
435
133 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
133
of 327 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 119 of 133 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held327 (5 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total57,830
Reactions total1,585
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 11m
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 180 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,961 reactions across 297 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,36234.4%
1,25931.8%
🔥1,24831.5%
🤔370.934%
😁230.581%
👏60.151%
😱40.101%
🤗40.101%
🥰40.101%
👀30.076%
💔20.05%
😨20.05%
🤯20.05%
10.025%
❤‍🔥10.025%
🗿10.025%
😢10.025%
🤣10.025%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 297 of the 327 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,961 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 327 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 19:31 UTC229 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

⭐️ Бурдж-Халифа стал самым высоким зданием мира в 2007 году и до сих пор удерживает этот статус. Высота - 828 м, 163 этажа.☀️🔥👍 Наш канал в MAX 👉 Подпишись

🔥75👍3

2 Sept 2026, 17:31 UTC309 views10 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Потрясающая техника водного щита от пожарных, которая защищает спасателей от огненных взрывов. Наш канал в MAX 👉 Подпишись

🔥5👍41

2 Sept 2026, 16:31 UTC331 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

😱 Когда врач сказал: «У вас двойня»… Я пришла на УЗИ, легла на кушетку и приготовилась слушать привычное «всё в порядке». Врач молча водила датчиком по животу и вдруг будничным голосом произнесла: — У вас двойня. ДВОЙНЯ?! В этот момент я перестала слышать всё вокруг. В голове пронеслось: «Как двойня? Чья двойня? Что с ней делать? Смогу ли я понравиться им обоим? А если они закричат одновременно, как себя вести?»

5👍4🔥4

2 Sept 2026, 15:31 UTC357 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Интересная механическая монета, которая также работает как держатель колец. Наш канал в MAX 👉 Подпишись

👍10🔥41

2 Sept 2026, 12:31 UTC389 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Если владеть знаниями, то можно даже расколоть 20 тонный камень простой кувалдой. Наш канал в MAX 👉 Подпишись

🔥9👍72

2 Sept 2026, 11:31 UTC404 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Хотела скрыть беременность от мужа. У нас уже есть дочь, плюс мой сын от первого брака - но он хотел еще. Следил за моим циклом, питанием, копил деньги. Забота превратилась в манию, и он даже начал меня пугать. Что еще хуже - я не хотела детей вообще. Когда увидела две полоски, молча пошла делать аборт, срок ~5 недель. Выбрала день, когда муж 100% будет на работе, сама взяла отгул, никто не знал, даже близкие подруг

🔥6👍53

2 Sept 2026, 10:31 UTC402 views19 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🌊 Слияние двух рек в Индии Из за плотности вода не смешивается Наш канал в MAX 👉 Подпишись

8👍6🔥5

2 Sept 2026, 08:31 UTC414 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🇹🇷 Волшебная ночь в Анталии Наш канал в MAX 👉 Подпишись

👍73🔥3

2 Sept 2026, 07:31 UTC430 views20 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

😱 «Аня, открой дверь!» — последнее, что я успел сказать… Кофе из бумажного стаканчика уже не бодрит. Впереди тьма и трасса, 50 километров до дома. Представляю, как Аня суетится на кухне — ждёт меня, улыбается, укладывает волосы. Месяц разлуки — и вот, наконец, возвращаюсь. Фары из темноты — и вдруг в меня несётся фура. Крик, удар, тьма. …Но вот я уже стою во дворе. Машина цела, ночь — как будто впитала звук. Тольк

👍115🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 327 posts we hold for @shock_facts05. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Мозговой штурм - загадки и викторины
@TriviaGames · 23,955
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 September 2026
Правда или ложь 🙋‍♂️
@pravda_nepravda · 28,529
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 9 September 2026
Интересный уголок
@poznavation · 33,996
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 3 September 2026
Знаток
@znatok · 78,738
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
Эрудит
@Braintorn · 38,540
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 31 August 2026
Самый Умный | Опросы
@smartest_oprosi · 24,091
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 September 2026
География в опросах
@geografiyatg · 49,648
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
Удивительный Мир 🌍
@divo_planeta · 21,790
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 22 September 2026
Шальная аристократка
@zhenskii_yumor · 46,029
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 27 August 2026
Книга Знаний
@book_know · 72,387
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
Жуткие факты
@scary_facts11 · 184,683
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
ЧЁ по ОПРОСАМ
@chpch3 · 27,389
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 10 September 2026
Узнай Историю | Опросы
@uznai_history · 24,421
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 September 2026
Интересные факты
@interesnie_fac · 154,662
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 12 August 2026
Анекдоты | Мемы | Юмор 🍒
@a_necdot69 · 136,382
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 13 August 2026
Дома Не Поймут
@domanpm · 59,547
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 23 August 2026
Знайка | Факты обо всём
@znaika_fact · 29,726
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 September 2026
Подслушано Знаменитости
@overhearstar · 43,203
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
ЧЁ по ЧЁМ
@chpch0 · 33,123
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ФАКТЫ +🎭” (@shock_facts05), 11,411 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shock_facts05.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.