Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for درر وفوائد علماء داغستان

Channel

درر وفوائد علماء داغستان

@favaiddag

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

3,686subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001100099407
TypeChannel
Username@favaiddag
Created2 August 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/favaiddag

Growth

3,6743,6863,6806 August 2026 — 3,680 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,681 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,681 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,682 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,681 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,676 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,674 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,677 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,684 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,686 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,685 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,684 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,686 subscribers6 August 20267 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 32 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,672–3,688 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 00:383,686+2
2 Sept 2026, 12:143,684-1
30 Aug 2026, 15:263,685-1
27 Aug 2026, 21:473,686+2
25 Aug 2026, 03:053,684+7
21 Aug 2026, 09:273,677+3
18 Aug 2026, 05:133,674-2
15 Aug 2026, 00:223,676-5
11 Aug 2026, 22:113,681-1
9 Aug 2026, 03:543,682+1
6 Aug 2026, 04:323,681no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:453,681+1
6 Aug 2026, 00:233,680first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
48s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

243 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15463.4%
👍6426.3%
🔥2510.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2025 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 21:47 UTC556 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Daru_salatawFile

File, posted without a caption

29 Jul 2026, 21:44 UTC685 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

يتحدث فضيلة الشيخ يحيى الغوثاني عن الشيخ إلياس بن الحاج علي الأقوشي الداغستاني، رحمهما الله تعالى

6

27 Jul 2026, 18:24 UTC725 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

وتمام تفصيل الهجرة ومواضع وجوبها وندبها مع دلائل من يوجب الهجرة من ديار داغستان التي استولى عليها الكفار ومن يقول بعدم وجوبها منها مع بيان ما هو الحقّ منهما في رسالتنا «المصابيح المسلمية لأهل الإسلام الجبلية». فراجعه فإنه كتاب لا بدّ من مصاحبته وملازمته في هذا الزمان الذي ظهر فيه ظلم الحكماء وجور الكبراء، اللهم أظهر الحقّ وأزل الباطل يا ذا العزّة والبقاء. مسلم العرادي https://t.me/favaidda

👍52

16 Jul 2026, 11:45 UTC≈2,490 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

لا يتوقّف الأمر بالاقتداء على عصمة المقتدى به، فكلُّنا مأمورون باقتداء العلماء فيما لا نَعلم خطأَهم فيه والقولُ بعدم جواز اقتداء مَن يجوز عليه الخطأ هو قول الرافضة، والله تعالى أعلم «علي الغُمُوقِي»

🔥8

18 Jun 2026, 07:36 UTC≈1,910 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ومن محدثاتهم أيضا : الجهر بالقراءة والذكر حال وضع الميت في النعش وحال السير وقد عمت البلوى في ديارنا من غير إنكار من أحد راجع «الأذكار» وابن الرملي وابن قاسم وحاشية الرملي في شرح قول «المنهاج» في (باب الجنازة) : «ويكره اللغط في سير الجنازة ». «سعيد (الهركني) رحمه الله المعيد» https://t.me/favaidda

12🔥1

26 May 2026, 09:25 UTC≈2,380 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

نعم هذا اليمني (صالح اليمني) واسع الاطلاع في العلوم حيث صنّف فيها كتباً جليلةً، منها: «المنار شرح البحر الزخار»، و«نجاح الطالب»، و«الأبحاث المسدّدة»، و«الإتحاف»، و«العلم الشامخ»، و«الأرواح النوافخ» إلى غير ذلك. وقال رحمه الله في ديباجة «العلم الشامخ»: «اللهم إنه لا مذهب لي إلا دين الإسلام»، وصرح في مواضع منه أنه لا يقلد أحداً من أئمة الشريعة والعقيدة. أنا الحقير لا أنكره نظراً إلى آثاره الجليلة على أنّه في مسألة خل

🔥52

6 May 2026, 18:26 UTC≈2,550 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

مطلب حاكم الشرطة فإنّ حكم حاكم بغير ما أَنزل اللهُ تعالى وإن وافَق الشرعَ لا يجوزُ ، فيأثم به حاكمُ الشُرطة والذي طلب منه الحكم. نعم : أنّ المرجّح: أنّه إذا عَلِمَ صاحِبُ الحقِّ أنّه لا يصلُ إلى حقّه إِلَّا برفْع الحقِّ إلى حاكمِ الشرطة الجائرين . . فله ذلك ولا يأثم به، ويأثم حاكمُ الشُّرطة؛ لكون حكمه بغير ما أنزل الله تعالى وإن وافق ما في نفس الأمر. وذكر في «الروضة» وغيرها أنّه لو ادّعى الشاهد لأداء الشهادة عن

8🔥1

28 Mar 2026, 08:23 UTC≈17,900 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

قال علي السلطي: اعلم : أن النحو قنطرة الآداب وأنه أبو العلوم كما أن الصرف أم العلوم فيه جمال الكلام وكماله؛ كما أن بالمنطق تمام الفكر وجلاله. https://t.me/favaidda

17🔥3

24 Mar 2026, 20:01 UTC≈3,400 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥42

12 Feb 2026, 21:22 UTC≈3,670 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

قال بعض العلماء: الصرف أمّ العلوم والنحو أبوها

21👍4

24 Jan 2026, 15:10 UTC≈3,790 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @talibruPhoto

Это не просто очередная книга — это наше сокровище, сокровище дагестанцев, которое долгое время было утеряно, скрыто и забыто. Книга Муслима аль-Уради (да помилует его Аллах) издаётся впервые с полноценным научным исследованием. Пусть Аллах воздаст Мухаммаду аль-Годобери, который посвятил своё время и силы работе над этой книгой, чтобы мы и будущие поколения смогли узнать об этом сокровище и прочитать его. Мы, дагес

13👍5🔥3

8 Jan 2026, 08:53 UTC≈3,350 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ثم رأيتُني قلتُ في بعض منظوماتي متعرِّضاً لأحوال أهل الزمان حين رأيتُهم مخالفينَ لما أوجب عليهم من الأديانِ وارتكابَهم على أكثر الحرامِ؛ كأنّهم مخلَّصونَ بَرِيئُونَ عن تكليفِ الملكِ العلّامِ هذه الأبياتَ من بحر الوافر في وقت شباب هذا الحقير الزابرة: وإِنِّي قَدْ رَأَيْتُ الدَّهْرَ صَعْبًا - عَلَى الأَحْرَارِ فِي هَذِي الدِّيَارِ لِأَنَّ كَثِيرَهُمْ شَغَلُوا ذُنُوبًا- وَهُمْ قَدْ لَازَمُوا أَعْلَى الشِّرَارِ أَظُنُّ

11👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @favaiddag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“درر وفوائد علماء داغستان” (@favaiddag), 3,686 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/favaiddag.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.