Channel
@fckfamous
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
7,349subscribers
+68 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002161699977 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fckfamous |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fckfamous |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 7,349 | +9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 7,340 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 7,344 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 7,352 | -7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 7,359 | +12 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 7,347 | +11 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 7,336 | +3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 7,333 | +18 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:41 | 7,315 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:10 | 7,313 | +32 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 7,281 | first reading |
95 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 95 (3 August 2026 – 20 August 2026) |
| Views total | 59,256 |
| Reactions total | 2,437 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,268 reactions across 89 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,468 | 27.9% | |
| 🤣 | 917 | 17.4% | |
| 🫡 | 635 | 12.1% | |
| 🔥 | 609 | 11.6% | |
| custom 5246786448849394383 | 423 | 8.03% | |
| 😁 | 304 | 5.77% | |
| 👍 | 238 | 4.52% | |
| ⚡ | 234 | 4.44% | |
| 💔 | 192 | 3.64% | |
| 💯 | 127 | 2.41% | |
| 👏 | 48 | 0.911% | |
| 😈 | 43 | 0.816% | |
| 🤬 | 24 | 0.456% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 0.114% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 95 of the 95 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,705 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fckfamous. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 95 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Чергова дуже страшна ніч для Києва. Є загиблі та поранені. Десятки ракет по місту. По обʼєктах цивільної інфраструктури та житлових домах, по звичайних людях.
🤬20💔2👎1
руйнування в Києві та області, на Одещині та Чернігівщині: росіяни довго готувалися і комбінували балістику різних типів, крилаті ракети й дрони так, щоб якомога сильніше пошкодити цивільну інфраструктуру, — Зеленський У столиці пошкоджено житлові будинки, зокрема багатоповерхівку, де зруйнували верхні поверхи, також дитячу лікарню та школу. ❗️На Одещині ворог атакував дронами пункт пропуску на кордоні з Молдовою,…
💔11🤬4❤2👎1🔥1
Тихої ночі спільнота. Не забувайте реагувати на сигнали повітряної тривоги !
❤70🫡9⚡3
Video, posted without a caption
🤣37❤6custom 52467864488493943835⚡1
https://youtu.be/YxkK_T9wKHo?si=89krXm_JOe-_cuzv
🫡17custom 52467864488493943837❤6⚡1
На волі! З полону росії повернули ще 103 Захисників України! Сьогодні з російського полону в межах першого етапу чергового обміну звільнено ще 103 оборонців Української держави. Вітаю вдома! Сім’ї вже отримали добру звістку, почули рідний голос у телефоні й скоро зможуть обійняти своїх батьків, синів, чоловіків після важкої розлуки. Щаслива мить, якої так довго чекали. Солдати, сержанти й офіцери, які захищали Укр…
❤44⚡4👍1
🇺🇦ЦІЄЇ СУБОТИ - ВАЖЛИВА ЛЕКЦІЯ В DISCORD $ILVER $QUAD🇺🇦 🫡Розберемо, як бойовому медику діяти тоді, коли реальні умови війни диктують свої правила. 🤫Тема: «Тактика медика в умовах сучасної війни. Адаптація дій згідно протоколу TCCC до наявних умов» 🎙Лектори: Знахар • Гаррі • Драб • Сімпл ⏰ О котрій: 20:00 🔥Уже цієї суботи - вмикаємо Discord і занурюємось у тему по-справжньому. 🔜 https://discord.gg/2Ag9CtyDC 🇺🇦 Пі…
⚡15❤6
File, posted without a caption
❤17🫡8custom 52467864488493943836⚡1
Добрий ранок меценати!
❤50custom 524678644884939438315⚡7🤣4👍1
Напевно коли вуса почнуть рости а не пушок під носом 🤣
❤45🤣20😁5⚡2👎1
https://www.jnsm.com.ua/h/0818U/
❤22🫡6⚡3
🙃😁🤗
🤣66😈2⚡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @fckfamous. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Чи хочете атомну війну ?
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FCK FAMOUS GROUP” (@fckfamous), 7,349 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fckfamous.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.