Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Психолог Марина Филоник

Channel

Психолог Марина Филоник

@filonikm

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,887subscribers

-74 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001509611695
TypeChannel
Username@filonikm
Created25 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/filonikm

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,8877,9617,9247 August 2026 — 7,961 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,955 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,951 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,940 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,952 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,946 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,948 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,950 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,948 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,916 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,895 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,887 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 40 days, net -74. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,876–7,972 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 16:007,887-8
12 Sept 2026, 13:007,895-21
8 Sept 2026, 11:177,916-32
2 Sept 2026, 20:297,948-2
31 Aug 2026, 00:387,950+2
28 Aug 2026, 01:487,948+2
24 Aug 2026, 15:527,946-6
20 Aug 2026, 20:077,952+12
17 Aug 2026, 22:257,940-11
11 Aug 2026, 12:267,951-4
8 Aug 2026, 04:217,955-6
7 Aug 2026, 04:327,961first reading

Engagement

64 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.24%
avg views ÷ 7,887 subscribers
Avg views / post
729
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 64 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held64 (27 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total9,476
Reactions total475
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12m 56s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,889 reactions across 63 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,87865.0%
🔥43615.1%
👍33111.5%
❤‍🔥1174.05%
💯672.32%
👏260.9%
170.588%
🥰120.415%
😢50.173%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,889 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 63 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @filonikm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 64 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC347 views30 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Video

Прощение себя - это не про то, чтобы наконец стать хорошим На недавнем эфире про прощение в закрытом канале говорили, что мы порой очень жестоко относимся к себе и называем это смирением: «Я всё испортил. Это все по моим грехам. Я должен был поступить иначе». За этим обычно стоит совсем не смирение, а требование к себе: «Я должен быть другим. Я мог бы стать лучше, если бы больше старался». Такая попытка «исправить

26👍4

28 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC541 views103 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Во Успении мира не оставила еси Не оставила этот мир, эту землю, вот это все, в чем мы живем. Мне так часто хочется, чтобы мир был другим. То, какой он есть сейчас, никуда не годится. Надо либо переделать, либо оставить… А Ты почему-то не оставила. И не стала переделывать. Ты осталась с нами, как и Твой Сын. Ты продолжаешь пребывать там, где Он. А Он - посреди нас. Как на свадьбе, Ты тихо и неприметно заботишься

81❤‍🔥21👍1

27 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC592 views50 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Метро внутреннего кризиса. Мы обнаружили, где центральная станция Друзья, для тех кто ждал, когда появится убедительно научное доказательство того, что принимать себя – необходимый навык для жизни, – вот, подвезли. Помните исследование «Пульс души»? Многие из вас здесь в нём участвовали. Так вот, наш научный отдел – Фёдор Шаньков и Наталья Толстых, люди, у которых от статистики загораются глаза (чего я в себе давно

27🔥15👍8

27 Aug 2026, 05:39 UTC719 views41 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Алкоголь, пятый торт и новый айфон. Что их объединяет? С алкоголизмом - особая история. Потому что есть химическая зависимость, а есть случаи, когда за ней стоит другое заболевание - например, депрессия или, нередко, биполярное расстройство. Тогда человек пытается с помощью химических веществ справиться с эмоционально тяжёлым состоянием. И в таком случае важно работать не только с последствиями, но и с тем, что чело

30🔥11

26 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC722 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🙋‍♂ Через час начинаем наш прямой эфир в закрытом канале про прощение. 🔗Про закрытый канал: https://t.me/filonikm/643 🔗Регистрация по ссылке: https://filonik.ru/tg/privat До встречи! *записи всех эфиров сохраняются в закрытом телеграмм - канале, а также на платформе Геткурс и доступны в рамках ежемесячной подписки

6🔥1

26 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC762 views23 reactionsread 28 August 2026

А ВСЕХ И ВСЕ ЛИ МОЖНО ПРОСТИТЬ? ...и только то усталое плечо простит сейчас, да и простит еще, и только те печальные глаза простят все то, чего прощать нельзя… Муж изменил, бросил с детьми. Мама годами унижала. Близкий человек предал в самый тяжёлый момент. Кто-то воспользовался твоим доверием, а потом ещё и сказал: «Сама виновата». И ты со всем этим живешь. Злишься, не можешь забыть, не хочешь больше видеть этого

🔥145👍4

25 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC749 views37 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Ну что, друзья, тяжело вам прощать? Ха-ха)) Слушайте, мы сейчас созванивались с Антоном Марковичем Бурно по поводу завтрашнего эфира. Если серьёзно, сломали все мозги про то, что такое прощение, как нам выстроить план эфира, как понять, что ты простил, что ты не простил. А ещё ж такое, значит, ну типа если ты не простишь, Бог тебя не простит. Потом смотрю ваши вопросы, понимаю, что номер один вообще лидирует тема п

🔥2010👏5👍2

25 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC701 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥7

25 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC768 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Собрала ваши вопросы к эфиру в закрытом канале про прощение 26 августа в 19.00: 🟢Очень хочется понять: как простить, если головой понимаешь, что хочется простить, а глубинно не получается? Что делать, если думаешь, что уже простила, а потом оказывается, что это была какая-то фальшь? Как вообще понять, что действительно простила? 🟢Как простить себя, когда понимаешь, что смысла дальше себя гнобить нет, но отпустить вс

👍8🔥6

25 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC787 views38 reactionsread 28 August 2026

ОЧЕНЬ ХОЧЕТСЯ ПРОСТИТЬ, НО НЕ ПОЛУЧАЕТСЯ Вы понимаете, что не хотите больше жить с этим грузом. Не хотите каждый раз возвращаться к тому, что произошло, злиться, вспоминать, прокручивать в голове. «Надо отпустить» - мы слышим это постоянно. От близких, психологов, священников. Иногда говорим это себе сами. Но не получается.😔 И тогда как бы еще одним слоем возникает другая боль: «Что со мной не так? Почему я не мог

31🔥7

24 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC927 views85 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

НЕ ГОВОРИ «ДА», ПОКА НЕ... Представьте, что вы в поиске отношений. И вот, наконец, этот долгожданный момент: вы знакомитесь с мужчиной. (Пишу от лица женщины, но в данном случае пол не важен. Если вы мужчина - механизмы могут быть те же - читайте дальше). Итак, мужчина вроде бы адекватный. Пишет, зовёт на встречи, проявляет интерес, говорит, что вы ему очень нравитесь. Вам приятно. Вы чувствуете себя желанной, замеч

👍3429🔥106💯6

23 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC918 views20 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Друзья, напоминалка про сегодняшний бесплатный эфир "Травма и кризис веры. Первые плоды исследования" в 19.00 🔴Подробнее об эфире⬇️ https://t.me/filonikm/4807?single 📍Встреча пройдет в Zoom

15👍2🔥2👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @filonikm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Jul 2026, 05:01 UTCAnonymous Poll213 voters

Какие ошибки на пути принятия себя люди обычно допускают?

  1. Нежелание сближаться с неприятным тебе человеком14%
  2. Желание что-то изменить в себе25%
  3. Позиция "я хуже всех", "другие лучше меня"59%
  4. Привычка игнорировать свои потребности и желания77%
  5. Умение нести ответственность за поступки11%
  6. Избегание встречи со своими чувствами и эмоциями77%
  7. Просьба о помощи в моменты усталости26%
  8. Стремление реализовать амбиции и планы на будущее9%
  9. Пренебрежние своим телом и здоровьем72%
  10. Стремление быть удобным в отношениях81%

The shares total 451%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Игумен Нектарий (Морозов)
@igumennektariy · 25,341
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
Что-то личное
@chto_to_li4noe · 27,885
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
Школа Семейных Отношений Яны Катаевой
@yanakataeva · 29,471
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
Канал о. Саввы Мажуко
@savvamazhuko · 29,568
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
Священник Никита Горбик
@otec_nikita · 24,716
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 September 2026
Православный психолог | Никита Сергеевич Яночкин
@yanochkin_psiholog · 24,168
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психолог Марина Филоник” (@filonikm), 7,887 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/filonikm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.