Photo, posted without a caption
❤19👏9🔥6🤡4🍌1😱1

Channel
@finconsp
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14,045subscribers
+334 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002354914120 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @finconsp |
| Description | ███ ВНУТРЕННИЙ ДОКУМЕНТ ███ ГРУППА "ФИНАНСОВАЯ КОНСПИРОЛОГИЯ" ▲ конфиденциально ▲ |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 56 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/finconsp |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:09 | 14,045 | +102 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:01 | 13,943 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:29 | 13,950 | -3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 07:45 | 13,953 | -11 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 02:55 | 13,964 | +5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:49 | 13,959 | +13 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:38 | 13,946 | +42 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:08 | 13,904 | +79 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:01 | 13,825 | +3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:49 | 13,822 | -3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:19 | 13,825 | -3 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:50 | 13,828 | -4 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:48 | 13,832 | -8 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 13:26 | 13,840 | -5 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 12:39 | 13,845 | -4 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 12:56 | 13,849 | +2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 11:21 | 13,847 | -3 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 10:51 | 13,850 | +17 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 22:26 | 13,833 | +30 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 13:22 | 13,803 | first reading |
72 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 72 (18 July 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 117,170 |
| Reactions total | 1,220 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 17:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,545 reactions across 70 posts, in 46 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 641 | 18.1% | |
| ❤ | 601 | 17.0% | |
| 👍 | 520 | 14.7% | |
| 🤔 | 356 | 10.0% | |
| 🤡 | 193 | 5.44% | |
| 👏 | 188 | 5.30% | |
| 🤣 | 170 | 4.80% | |
| 💯 | 140 | 3.95% | |
| 😁 | 131 | 3.70% | |
| ⚡ | 103 | 2.91% | |
| 🤯 | 73 | 2.06% | |
| 🤮 | 52 | 1.47% | |
| ✍ | 50 | 1.41% | |
| 🤬 | 50 | 1.41% | |
| 🥴 | 41 | 1.16% | |
| 👎 | 40 | 1.13% | |
| 😱 | 27 | 0.762% | |
| 😢 | 22 | 0.621% | |
| 🤪 | 17 | 0.48% | |
| 💊 | 14 | 0.395% | |
| 26 further kinds | 116 | 3.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 72 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,052 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Photo, posted without a caption
❤19👏9🔥6🤡4🍌1😱1
Ограбление века: как хакеры похитили у Binance $6,34 миллиарда за 20 минут Крупнейшая криптовалютная биржа мира стала жертвой одной из самых масштабных кибератак в истории. Но самое удивительное в этой истории — не сумма похищенного, а способ, которым злоумышленники получили доступ к миллиардам долларов. 29 октября 2026 года хакеры вывели с криптовалютных кошельков Binance активы на 6,34 млрд долларов, причём основ…
🔥17🤩6❤3😁2⚡1👍1
Мы с Дмитрием Комаровым в рамках работы Фонда экономических исследований Михаила Хазина написали работу о возможных причинах слома системы макроэкономического управления экономикой в США. Работа получилась очень интересная, на днях её размещу, двумя файлами, русским и английским. А пока её можно прочитать здесь .
👍24❤9👏2
Билл Гейтс и глава Pfizer перед судом в Нидерландах: обвинения в причастности к «Великой перезагрузке» В Нидерландах продолжается судебное разбирательство, способное привлечь внимание далеко за пределами страны. Семь истцов, заявляющих о серьёзном ущербе здоровью после вакцинации против COVID-19, предъявили гражданский иск Биллу Гейтсу, генеральному директору Pfizer Альберту Бурле и ещё пятнадцати ответчикам. Их адв…
🔥32💯19👏9⚡2😁2
Уоррен Баффет: медвежий рынок — не повод для паники, а время покупать Пока инвесторы гадают, сколько ещё продлится рост фондового рынка, легендарный Уоррен Баффет напоминает о простом принципе: настоящее богатство создаётся не в погоне за растущими котировками, а благодаря умению сохранять хладнокровие, когда рынки охватывает страх. Три года непрерывного роста американского фондового рынка заставляют инвесторов всё…
👍16🥴8✍7🔥7❤2🤡1🤣1
Джейми Даймон предупреждает об угрозе ИИ-агентов для банков. Но настоящая причина тревоги может быть совсем иной Глава JPMorgan Chase Джейми Даймон предостерегает от использования искусственного интеллекта для управления банковскими счетами, ссылаясь на серьёзные риски безопасности. Однако исследователи полагают, что за обеспокоенностью крупнейших банков может скрываться куда более прозаичная причина: искусственный …
🔥12😁7👍4❤2👎1
🎼 МУЗЫКАЛЬНАЯ ГОСТИНАЯ All About That Bass - Postmodern Jukebox Дорогие конспирологи! Предлагаем вашему вниманию великолепное исполнение композиции All About That Bass в оригинальной джазовой аранжировке Postmodern Jukebox. На сцене — блистательные вокалистки Haley Reinhart, Morgan James и Ariana Savalas, а также харизматичный контрабасист и вокалист Casey Abrams. Великолепные голоса, безупречное чувство ритма, …
❤31👍29❤🔥7🤓1🥰1
Дорогие друзья! Предлагаем вашему вниманию первый выпуск нашей новой авторской рубрики «Если подумать…» О событиях, фактах и смыслах, которые не лежат на поверхности. Это будет постоянная рубрика интеллектуальных аналитических комментариев, в основе которой — глубокий взгляд на происходящее, ясность изложения, независимость суждений и лёгкая ирония. Наша цель — не просто рассказывать о том, что произошло, но и по…
👍51🔥25👏7💯5👎4✍2❤2🤡1
ЕЦБ одобрил приобретение UniCredit контрольного пакета Commerzbank Итальянская банковская группа UniCredit получила разрешение Европейского центрального банка (ЕЦБ) на установление контроля над немецким Commerzbank. Решение регулятора стало важным этапом на пути к одной из наиболее значимых трансграничных сделок в европейском банковском секторе. Европейский центральный банк разрешил UniCredit преодолеть порог владе…
🔥13😁4👍3❤2💩2
Глава Бундесбанка отверг план французских левых по списанию госдолга и предупредил об угрозе гиперинфляции Президент Бундесбанка Йоахим Нагель резко отверг предложение французского левого политика Жан-Люка Меланшона списать ту часть государственного долга Франции, которая находится на балансах центральных банков. По словам главы немецкого центробанка, такая мера противоречила бы европейским договорам и могла бы запу…
🔥16👍11⚡5❤4🤡4😁4👏1
Подтверждение политически мотивированного дебанкинга в США В США назревает скандал совершенно особого рода. Пока британское правительственное расследование — весьма удобно — пришло к выводу, что клиентам банков не отказывали в обслуживании по политическим мотивам, опубликованный на прошлой неделе доклад Управления контролёра денежного обращения США (OCC) пришёл к прямо противоположному выводу. Расследование OCC, на…
🔥39👏19⚡6❤5😁4👍2👻1
Саудовская Аравия может стать следующей проблемой для американского рынка облигаций Саудовская Аравия, возможно, вскоре станет следующей серьёзной проблемой для американского рынка государственных облигаций.
🤔24🤣10🔥7👍3👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @finconsp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Группа "Финансовая конспирология"” (@finconsp), 14,045 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/finconsp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.