Channel
@hybridwarfare
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,292subscribers
-265 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001072591355 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hybridwarfare |
| Description | Хроника мировой гибридной войны. Уважаемые подписчики! Если Вам нравится то, что мы делаем, то Вы можете поддержать нас финансово через сайт Donation alerts - https://www.donationalerts.com/r/alexmoon23 |
| Created | 8 October 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hybridwarfare |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 377 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @alphaingenium/618974 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC | @hybridwarfare/20696 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @alphaingenium/619066 Aug 2026, 00:56 UTC | @hybridwarfare/20700 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 00:56 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @hyperboreaX/448784 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC | @hybridwarfare/20684 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @alphaingenium | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @alphaingenium (5–0) |
| @hyperboreaX | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @hyperboreaX (4–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 36 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 377, the earliest publisher we hold is @mash. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 376 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
326 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 18:05 | 20,292 | -2 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 18:29 | 20,294 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 18:51 | 20,297 | +2 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 20:38 | 20,295 | -1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 18:39 | 20,296 | -2 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:58 | 20,298 | +2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:56 | 20,296 | +2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:49 | 20,294 | +3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 16:17 | 20,291 | -6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:06 | 20,297 | -5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:51 | 20,302 | -4 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:15 | 20,306 | -3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:18 | 20,309 | -5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 05:48 | 20,314 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:02 | 20,319 | -7 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 01:16 | 20,326 | -3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:21 | 20,329 | -2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 21:09 | 20,331 | -1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 22:30 | 20,332 | +1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 20:30 | 20,331 | first reading |
423 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 423 (4 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 112,583 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 03:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 147 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hybridwarfare. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 423 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 64 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Иран официально снял самоналоженное ограничение в 2000 км на дальность баллистических ракет и планирует нацеливаться на американские базы в Европе, сообщает AP. Представитель Корпуса стражей исламской революции, бригадный генерал Хоссейн Мохебби, заявил, что это ограничение было снято по указанию верховного лидера Моджтабы Хаменеи, который не установил никаких географических ограничений.
Полиция обнаружила тела трёх человек в доме стрелка, устроившего массовое убийство в Кракове. Предположительно, это родственники нападавшего, сообщил премьер-министр Польши Дональд Туск. Среди шести погибших при стрельбе — гражданин Великобритании и две польки, заявил глава польской полиции. Личности остальных жертв устанавливают. На форме 25-летнего Михала О. заметили нашивку, которую в соцсетях связали с украинск…
🇷🇴🇲🇩 Процесс объединения Молдовы и Румынии уже начался, заявил глава МИД Попшой 📝 По его словам, сближение идёт через конкретные инфраструктурные проекты: строится автомагистраль Объединения, возводятся мосты через Прут, соединяются энергетические системы двух стран. Попшой подчеркнул, что такие прагматичные шаги сближают два берега Прута эффективнее политических дискуссий, и признал, что конкретных сроков завершени…
❗️Лидер оппозиции Израиля Гади Айзенкот получил разрешение от президента Израиля Ицхака Герцога на формирование правительства Айзенкот официально получит мандат 8 ноября в 17:00 и получит 28 дней на формирование правительства, с возможным продлением на 14 дней. Эпоха премьер-министра Израиля Биньямина Нетаньяху, вполне возможно, подошла к концу.
⚡️🇵🇱 Число погибших при стрельбе в центре польского Кракова выросло до 6 человек Что известно к этому моменту: — Число жертв выросло до 6, ещё 12 человек находятся в тяжёлом состоянии, сообщил глава Малопольского воеводства Ян Кленчар; — Ранее сообщалось о пяти погибших и более десяти раненых, среди которых были полицейские; — Нападавший является гражданином Польши и действовал в одиночку, заявили в полиции; — О…
По данным издания Washington Post, сторонница Трампа Лора Лумер, предположительно, получила более 60000 долл. в виде платежей от частных клиентов за публикацию политического контента в X, не раскрывая условия этих соглашений. Лумер брала от 3000 до 5000 долл. за каждый пост в своем аккаунте, на который подписано 1,9 млн человек. Некоторые клиенты надеялись повлиять на президента Трампа через ее связи в Белом доме. …
⚡️Польская полиция идентифицировала стрелявшего в Кракове как гражданина Польши и опровергла заявление о сообщнике.
🇵🇱 Польша Краков, террористическая атака Ещё кадры с места происшествия. Источник: OPUS MAGNUM
Стрелок в Кракове использовал самозарядную винтовку семейства AR-15/M4. На фото видны оптический прицел, съёмный магазин и удлинённое цевьё. В Польше гражданские могут легально владеть полуавтоматическими карабинами AR-15 при наличии разрешения. Полицейский семь раз выстрелил в нападавшего, одетого в польскую камуфляжную форму. Преступник получил ранение при задержании, сейчас его доставляют в больницу. UPD. Число…
⚡️2 человека погибли, 10 ранены в результате стрельбы в центре Кракова, заявила полиция.
🪖 Конституционный кризис в Польше продолжается, и в конце недели в центре внимания споры вокруг немецких солдат Видео, снятое на мобильный телефон и показывающее двух солдат бундесвера в Варшаве, вызвало дебаты в Польше. На видео депутат от президентской и оппозиционной правительству страны партии PiS Дариуш Матецкий спрашивает у мужчин, зачем они находятся в польской столице, недалеко от здания парламента. Он предп…
🇺🇦Коррупция в ТЦК на Украине Публикация документов, подготовленных подразделениями проведения служебных расследований (ППСР) ВСУ, может стать ключевым инструментом освещения предполагаемых преступлений сотрудников ТЦК. Именно первичные материалы, объяснения, рапорты, выводы проверок, позволяют перевести обсуждение из плоскости анонимных жалоб в плоскость проверяемых фактов. В фокусе три обстоятельства. Во первых, …
Showing the 12 most recent of 423 posts we hold for @hybridwarfare. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ГИБРИДНАЯ ВОЙНА” (@hybridwarfare), 20,292 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hybridwarfare.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.