27 measurements spanning 28 days, net -97. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,444–21,572 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Sept 2026, 17:39
21,459
-3
2 Sept 2026, 09:28
21,462
-4
1 Sept 2026, 06:47
21,466
-4
31 Aug 2026, 06:14
21,470
-1
30 Aug 2026, 05:19
21,471
-5
29 Aug 2026, 01:54
21,476
-10
27 Aug 2026, 23:06
21,486
-1
27 Aug 2026, 01:43
21,487
-36
26 Aug 2026, 00:04
21,523
+36
24 Aug 2026, 23:57
21,487
-2
23 Aug 2026, 13:56
21,489
-4
22 Aug 2026, 03:17
21,493
-13
20 Aug 2026, 17:13
21,506
-5
19 Aug 2026, 18:42
21,511
-2
18 Aug 2026, 21:12
21,513
+1
17 Aug 2026, 19:36
21,512
-7
16 Aug 2026, 15:57
21,519
-4
15 Aug 2026, 02:05
21,523
-2
13 Aug 2026, 17:37
21,525
-10
12 Aug 2026, 16:14
21,535
first reading
Engagement
78 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.7%
avg views ÷ 21,459 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,230
60 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
60
of 78 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
78 (23 July 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
253,890
Reactions total
6,910
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 15:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
36m 20s
Average length
3m 02s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,107 reactions across 72 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
3,486
43.0%
🤔
2,274
28.0%
❤
570
7.03%
💯
504
6.22%
🔥
317
3.91%
😁
284
3.50%
🥱
226
2.79%
🤡
219
2.70%
👎
76
0.937%
👏
45
0.555%
🥴
30
0.37%
👌
29
0.358%
🙈
11
0.136%
🤯
9
0.111%
😢
8
0.099%
🐳
6
0.074%
🤬
6
0.074%
⚡
5
0.062%
🤣
2
0.025%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,499 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
191
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 78 we hold a reading for · 28%
Most on one post
52
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @voitenkov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 78 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ХОЗЯЕВА ЧЁРНЫХ ДЫР И ТЁМНОЙ МАТЕРИИ
Мы замечали множество разных событий в жизни общества, которые не укладываются в стандартные объяснялки. Почему-то большие массы людей поступают неразумно, совершают вредные для себя поступки. Политики на высоких постах принимают очень странные решения. Войны начинаются без весомой причины. И тому подобные глупости, коих много в жизни человечества.
Дабы объяснить эту несуразицу, …
У нас в мире, есть, странный феномен - на всех побережьях имеются как минимум две линии инфраструктуры. Портовой, логистической, жилой, да - церковной.
Выглядит это как две параллельные линии вдоль линии моря. Одна у кромки воды, вторая на высоте 25-30 метров от уровня моря/реки и т.п.
Это однозначно показывает нам что был другой уровень моря. Причем еще совсем недавно, несколько веков назад. Это видно потому что м…
Согласен в том плане, что не сама технология, но её описание в народе, то, как она выглядит со стороны - должно было сохраниться. Это странно.
Есть схожий пример в лингвистике. Например буква Р могла читаться и как Пэ и как эР. Или буква H-h. Этот знак все читали по разному даже внутри одного языка: в иврите и русском это эН, в греческом это Э-Е, в романских это Эйч, в германских это Ха.
Выглядит так, как будто сте…
Много лет мы искали смысл в религии. В религиозных целях, в религиозных обрядах, в религиозных зданиях.
Предполагалось, что ранее у человечества были некие связи с другими существами, мирами, или уровнями бытия, или измерениями. Мы думали, что люди обладали обширными знаниями и владели продвинутыми технологиями.
Но потом что-то произошло. Некая планетарная катастрофа, или война, или ещё что-то. Человечество утеряло…
Большая колокольня. Высота первого яруса от пола до свода 8,6 метров.
При этом вообще никаких родных лестниц наверх. Ни внутри, ни снаружи. Нет ни люка, ни проёма.
Получается, что когда строили - не предполагали подниматься наверх.
Либо у них был подъёмник иного типа.
Церковь Троицы, село Заборовье, Тверская область.
Как было предсказано диким блогером из леса, Озон начал меняться. Вместо больших складов компания будет хранить товары в пунктах выдачи! То есть пункт выдачи одновременно становится маленьким складом.
Источник
Наверняка они поначалу накосячат и неправильно рассчитают. Владельцы пунктов выдачи взвоют, начнутся тёрки. Но потом придут к оптимальной организации.
Чем меньше система и чем страшнее угроза - тем быстрее и…
Война с Украиной... да чтож я опять... невойна с Украиной не закончится военной победой.
Украинцы не пойдут штурмовать Москву, и армия РФ не будет брать Киев. Полноценная война по типу Второй мировой - невозможна в нынешнем состоянии техносферы. Торжественной капитуляции с водружением победоносного флага не будет.
Осторожно и секторально бомбить противника, не провоцируя на сильные удары по себе - можно ещё очень д…
Почему ВСУ жгут склады российской торговой компании? Почему не наносятся более чувствительные удары по газовой и энергетической системам? Последствия будут куда серьёзнее и ощутимее, чем несколько сгоревших складов. Большие города останутся без энергии надолго. Москва вообще встанет.
По какой причине братские хохлы игнорируют такие вкусные и очень болезненные цели в России?
По той же.
За предыдущие годы энергетику…
Регулярно попадаются недоумённые высказывания граждан РФ о странностях украинской невойны. Почему не уничтожается руководство Украины? Они сидят в известных зданиях, они живут в известных кварталах, они ездят на прекрасно отслеживаемом транспорте.
Почему наносятся удары по складам Wildberries? Что там такого секретного военного?
У граждан появляются нездоровые мысли о тайных договорённостях. Некоторые высказываютс…
Я сейчас обмозговываю и проверяю очень перспективную модель одной четы физиков. И там есть просто охрененные находки. Например то, скорость света увеличивается рядом со звездами и планетами. И наоборот, замедляется до нуля вдали от скоплений галактик.
На деле есть куча форумов с обсуждением по теме и там всё спокойно делается без ОТО. Просто есть другой зафиксированный эффект - электромагнитные волны меняют частоту и скорость при полете от и к Земле. И всё спокойно работеат без ОТО
👍37🤔17🥱4❤2🤡1
Signed Артём Войтенков
Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @voitenkov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@voitenkov edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
22 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Будильник. Кому не всё равно @komunevseravno · 40,169 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
Председатель СНТ @predsedatelprav · 44,117 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Войтенков МЫСЛИ” (@voitenkov), 21,459 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/voitenkov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.