Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 45 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 111,347–111,556 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 16:17
111,510
+4
17 Sept 2026, 03:20
111,506
-3
15 Sept 2026, 06:56
111,509
+17
13 Sept 2026, 16:17
111,492
+2
11 Sept 2026, 17:55
111,490
-22
9 Sept 2026, 01:55
111,512
+5
5 Sept 2026, 16:19
111,507
+11
3 Sept 2026, 16:01
111,496
-23
2 Sept 2026, 09:25
111,519
-13
1 Sept 2026, 12:23
111,532
+3
31 Aug 2026, 08:44
111,529
+4
30 Aug 2026, 09:54
111,525
+13
29 Aug 2026, 07:42
111,512
+20
28 Aug 2026, 04:33
111,492
+2
27 Aug 2026, 03:18
111,490
+12
26 Aug 2026, 02:15
111,478
+38
25 Aug 2026, 01:43
111,440
+39
23 Aug 2026, 16:13
111,401
+30
22 Aug 2026, 01:57
111,371
-6
20 Aug 2026, 19:38
111,377
first reading
Engagement
436 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 115 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.4%
avg views ÷ 111,510 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,700
228 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
239
of 436 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 53 of 228 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
436 (3 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
2,905,290
Reactions total
0
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Sept 2026, 18:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈12,100
Videos
≈8,970
Links
≈10,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
8h 57m
Average length
2m 01s
Measured directly from 267 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2,386
across the posts below
Posts paid on
101
of 422 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
501
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zloyecolog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 436 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Что, если люди обращались к «искусственному интеллекту» за тысячи лет до появления компьютеров?
Сергей Добрышкин предлагает необычную версию: древние оракулы и загадочные артефакты могли быть не просто частью религиозного культа, а прообразами систем, которые сегодня мы назвали бы интеллектуальными.
В выпуске — Дельфийский оракул, роботы, религиозные образы, трансгуманизм и сингулярность. Отдельно — что произойдёт,…
6️⃣2️⃣ энергетических узла которые управляют планетой
Древние цивилизации знали то, что современная наука начинает заново открывать только сейчас. Планета это живой, дышащий организм со своей кровеносной системой и нервами, пронизанными тайной геометрией космоса.
На Востоке эти невидимые русла веками называли Лун Мэй или Вены Дракона. Это подземные течения, по которым движется жизненная энергия, определяющая здоров…
Россия — страна с самой большой наценкой на маркетплейсах
А 97% людей покупают одежду, электронику, косметику на ВБ, Озоне и AliExpress, где в стоимость включено всё что угодно, от логистики до хранения на складах
Единственный вариант сэкономить — закупаться почти по себестоимости, а для этого достаточно 1 минуты в день на канале «Записки Еврея»
Здесь публикуют товары со скидками до 85%, промокоды и даже акции «за…
Готовится к публикации новая статья на канале OPUS MAGNUM, в приватном канале и в библиотеке Акаши:
Питер Тиль: Palantir из Властелина Колец Д.Р.Р. Толкина. Архитектор цифрового Левиафана, который боится антихриста
⚫️Будущее уже прописано или нам это внушают?
Будущее можно увидеть только в одном случае: если оно уже прописано и не подлежит изменению. Это простая логика. А если так, то все разговоры о свободе воли превращаются в иллюзию, а наша жизнь, по сути, теряет смысл. Все правила, заветы и заповеди становятся пустым звуком. Ведь если мой путь предопределён заранее и я всегда поступлю так, как написано в сценарии, тогда и …
Showing the 12 most recent of 436 posts we hold for @zloyecolog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 75 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 60 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@zloyecolog named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@openthedore named in 3 posts, 19 August 2026 – 21 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Профессор Игорь Панарин @igor_panarin · 26,496 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 September 2026
Влад Фридом @vladfreedomevolve · 43,270 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
Вадим Шегалов. PLANDEMIA.NEWS @voyager1970 · 45,099 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
Евгения Долгорукая @reiki_dolgorukaya · 26,359 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 September 2026
[Conspiranews] @conspiranewschannel · 77,248 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Хранители и Вершители @alphaingenium · 103,565 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
Охотник на связи @ohotnik_na_sviazy · 74,656 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
Алан Мамиев "ЗОВ Предков" @AlanMamiati · 62,399 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
Hyperborea @hyperboreaX · 58,265 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
Будильник. Кому не всё равно @komunevseravno · 40,122 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
ЗАУГЛОМ @ZaUglom2024 · 56,370 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
Галина Царёва (официальный) @Galina_Tsareva_official · 67,693 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
Коваленко. НОВЫЙ МИРОВОЙ ПОРЯДОК- СОПРОТИВЛЕНИЕ @n_w_order · 111,555 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Секреты Поднебесной @sekrety_podnebesnoy · 22,445 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 September 2026
ЭТОТ ПРЕКРАСНЫЙ И ТАИНСТВЕННЫЙ МИР @mir_krasoti_i_tain · 26,293 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
🔥Здравомыслие @osoznanie_i_probuzhdenie2023 · 23,079 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
СВОБОДНОЕ ДЫХАНИЕ -- ☢ЯДрёна WatchЬ‼️ @shingarkin · 23,617 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
Глогер США Майами @VadimMiami · 48,025 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 26 August 2026
NASTIKA @nastikatube · 55,239 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 August 2026
АНТИУТОПИЯ @utopiyaproject · 30,864 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
Даниил (Даниэль) Сачков, создатель Бастиона @danielsatchkov · 35,753 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
Сон Разума @error_288 · 38,054 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
Войтенков МЫСЛИ @voitenkov · 21,415 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 September 2026
Старая🗝️книга @oldlibrary · 48,149 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 105 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Злой эколог” (@zloyecolog), 111,510 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zloyecolog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
