Шокирующая правда из уст самых влиятельных людей мира
Конспирология, которая подтверждается фактами
Владелец/ переводчик @Tatianapb
Купить рекламу @peachbPR, @walsxbt
Сотрудничаем @politmanagertg, @yumytg, @TeleBrand_Agency
Created
7 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 50 days, net -667. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 64,956–65,823 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 18:40
65,056
-96
19 Sept 2026, 04:18
65,152
-57
16 Sept 2026, 18:16
65,209
+57
14 Sept 2026, 23:17
65,152
-22
13 Sept 2026, 07:36
65,174
-24
11 Sept 2026, 09:58
65,198
-42
8 Sept 2026, 14:39
65,240
-52
5 Sept 2026, 07:57
65,292
-36
3 Sept 2026, 11:40
65,328
-8
1 Sept 2026, 08:13
65,336
-21
31 Aug 2026, 08:24
65,357
-26
30 Aug 2026, 05:05
65,383
-24
29 Aug 2026, 03:44
65,407
-32
28 Aug 2026, 02:16
65,439
-23
27 Aug 2026, 02:27
65,462
-25
26 Aug 2026, 05:37
65,487
-8
25 Aug 2026, 04:36
65,495
+122
23 Aug 2026, 23:45
65,373
-45
22 Aug 2026, 06:13
65,418
+12
20 Aug 2026, 21:44
65,406
first reading
Engagement
220 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.99%
avg views ÷ 65,056 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,500
104 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
104
of 220 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
220 (3 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
675,720
Reactions total
11,591
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 14:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈11,100
Videos
≈19,000
Links
≈16,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 35m
Average length
1m 16s
Measured directly from 171 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
27,092 reactions across 220 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💊
9,753
36.0%
🤬
3,033
11.2%
💯
2,845
10.5%
👍
1,602
5.91%
❤
1,384
5.11%
🤣
1,384
5.11%
😁
1,367
5.05%
🤯
1,192
4.40%
😡
1,002
3.70%
😱
551
2.03%
😢
539
1.99%
🤔
432
1.59%
😨
405
1.49%
🔥
388
1.43%
🤨
346
1.28%
😭
257
0.949%
💔
216
0.797%
👏
145
0.535%
🦄
124
0.458%
🥰
74
0.273%
4 further kinds
53
0.196%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 220 of the 220 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27,092 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 220 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 220 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @peach_blossombazi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 220 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
«Квир»-священница говорит, что «Бог небинарный» и «трансгендер»
«Вот почему Бог трансгендер: когда Бог, которого мы установили как небинарного, родился в человеческом обличье как наш Господь Иисус Христос, Мария сказала: «О, смотрите, мальчик». Бог — не мальчик».
📱 PeachBlossom | Группа каналов PB | Instagram | Bastyon | Donate
Бонни Блю шокировала откровенным признанием после родов: по ее словам, даже связь со 100 мужчинами не принесла ей удовлетворения. Теперь она намерена зайти еще дальше и одновременно пытается выяснить, кто же на самом деле является отцом ее ребенка».
"Хотя я все еще хочу больше секса. Завтра я сделаю ДНК-тесты 200 мужчин."
📱 PeachBlossom | Группа каналов PB | Instagram | Bastyon | Donate
Голливудский актер Мел Гибсон выступил с предупреждением к жителям Новой Зеландии о том, как элита пытается легализовать технологии изменения ДНК и фактически превратить целую нацию в подопытных. Гибсон идет на большой риск, высказываясь на эту тему.
Здравствуйте, Новая Зеландия. Ваш парламент рассматривает одни из самых масштабных изменений в законодательстве вашей страны в области биотехнологий и охраны окружающей…
Галь Гадот жертвует 1 миллион долларов на помощь жертвам 7 октября
Звезда «Чудо-женщины», получившая премию Genesis Prize 2026 года, пожертвует 1 миллион долларов и распределит еще 2 миллиона долларов, собранных филантропами, на помощь благотворительным организациям в Израиле, занимающимся проблемами травм и психического здоровья.
«После трех лет войны, потерь и невероятных трудностей я верю, что выздоровление начи…
Сенатор Митч Макконнелл улыбается, когда его снова везут в Сенат.
84-летний политик выглядит «слабым» и «растерянным».
📱 PeachBlossom | Группа каналов PB | Instagram | Bastyon | Donate
Маклмор объявляет о европейском туре «Свободу Палестине» после отмены его участия в туре Эда Ширана
Рэпер объявил, что выступит в поддержку «Свободу Палестине» в Дублине, Лондоне и Париже, обрушившись с критикой на «класс миллиардеров» за попытки «заставить его замолчать».
▪︎Бой Джордж защищает Роберта Крафта от критики после того, как Маклемора исключили из тура Эда Ширана.
«Роберт Крафт — не какой-то случайный е…
Харви Вайнштейн приговорен к 15 годам тюремного заключения в Нью-Йорке за сексуальное насилие над бывшей помощницей Мириам Хейли в 2006 году
Приговор стал результатом длительной судебной тяжбы, начавшейся с его обвинительного приговора 2020 года, который был отменен в 2024 году. Последующее повторное судебное разбирательство привело к еще одному обвинительному приговору в 2025 году.
Последний приговор знаменует соб…
Нетаньяху провел поразительное сравнение, описывая теракт 7 октября, сравнив Холокост и события 11 сентября, чтобы показать масштаб и историческую значимость насилия.
Он назвал 7 октября одним из самых мрачных дней в истории Израиля и самым смертоносным днем для евреев со времен Холокоста.
Затем, ссылаясь на население Израиля, составляющее около 10 миллионов человек, он сравнил пропорциональное воздействие 7 октя…
Это не президентский кортеж. Это не кортеж короля Карла. Это не масштабная полицейская операция в связи с серьезным преступлением. Это полицейский кортеж для защиты пустых автобусов для мигрантов в Великобритании.
🗣Мнения:
▪︎Защита пустых автобусов с мигрантами в то время как серьезные преступления остаются без должного внимания полиции — приоритеты, похоже, перевернуты с ног на голову.
▪︎Какая растрата ресурсов.
…
Бывший кандидат в мэры Нью-Йорка от Республиканской партии Кертис Силва призывает людей прийти посмотреть выступление дрэг-квин, высмеивающей Меланию Трамп.
«Сделайте мне одолжение, вы должны прийти на дрэг-шоу Мелании Трамп».
📱 PeachBlossom | Группа каналов PB | Instagram | Bastyon | Donate
Хавьер Бардем требует отстранить Пинк от должности посла ЮНИСЕФ после того, как она выступила в защиту еврейской общины
Испанский актер опубликовал несколько постов, призывающих людей подписать петицию,
в которой содержится призыв к ЮНИСЕФ принять «решительные меры и отстранить Пинк от должности посла».
Это произошло после того, как Пинк опубликовала пост, критикующий комментарии Маклемора, которые, по ее мнению, в…
Принц Гарри сказал, что ИИ опасен
«Пока мы ослабляем себя изнутри, нашим противникам не нужно изобретать новые способы нас разделить. Мы делаем часть их работы за них… у нас нет лет, чтобы предсказать, что будет дальше».
Гарри прервал свою речь об опасностях искусственного интеллекта на полпути из-за неисправности телесуфлера.
Герцог Сассекский не смог вспомнить речь без телесуфлера и в итоге внезапно покинул сцен…
😁80👏8❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 220 posts we hold for @peach_blossombazi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@peach_blossombazi edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Мне достаточно того, что есть в открытом доступе75%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 220 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
АНТИУТОПИЯ @utopiyaproject · 30,864 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
Глобальная перезагрузка @sensible_people · 37,992 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
Пробуждение сейчас! @GenWake · 22,262 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 September 2026
Влад Фридом @vladfreedomevolve · 43,270 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
NASTIKA @nastikatube · 55,151 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 August 2026
[Conspiranews] @conspiranewschannel · 77,248 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Секреты Поднебесной @sekrety_podnebesnoy · 22,452 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 September 2026
Россия на игле @RNIGL · 35,680 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
НЕОБЪЯСНИМО, НО ФАКТ @neobyasnimofact · 23,058 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 19 September 2026
Вадим Шегалов. PLANDEMIA.NEWS @voyager1970 · 45,032 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
KATIA TXI @KatiaTxiLive · 103,515 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
Осознание и Пробуждение @osoznanie_i_probuzhdenie2026 · 42,387 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
Коваленко. НОВЫЙ МИРОВОЙ ПОРЯДОК- СОПРОТИВЛЕНИЕ @n_w_order · 111,555 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Екатерина Сугак @ekaterinasugak · 42,830 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Наследие Николая Левашова @nikolay_levashov · 23,288 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 September 2026
ДРУГАЯ ИСТОРИЯ @DrygaiIstoria · 40,634 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 30 August 2026
Хранители и Вершители @alphaingenium · 103,565 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
ЭТОТ ПРЕКРАСНЫЙ И ТАИНСТВЕННЫЙ МИР @mir_krasoti_i_tain · 26,293 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
Старая🗝️книга @oldlibrary · 48,149 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
Президент Гордон @prezidentgordon · 163,149 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
КПО - Анна Руднева @anna_kpo · 22,395 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
Satori @kanalSatori · 44,147 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 August 2026
Злой эколог @zloyecolog · 111,576 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Pilip_plein @pilip_plein · 43,464 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 43 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PeachBlossom” (@peach_blossombazi), 65,056 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/peach_blossombazi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.