International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 23% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -943. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71,280–72,505 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 02:17
71,421
-106
16 Sept 2026, 19:55
71,527
-44
14 Sept 2026, 21:57
71,571
-25
13 Sept 2026, 11:15
71,596
-7
11 Sept 2026, 15:57
71,603
-34
9 Sept 2026, 01:57
71,637
-26
5 Sept 2026, 14:58
71,663
-130
3 Sept 2026, 13:17
71,793
-14
2 Sept 2026, 05:47
71,807
-8
1 Sept 2026, 05:46
71,815
-21
31 Aug 2026, 08:36
71,836
-8
30 Aug 2026, 06:54
71,844
-24
29 Aug 2026, 03:24
71,868
-14
28 Aug 2026, 00:22
71,882
-23
27 Aug 2026, 03:37
71,905
-18
26 Aug 2026, 02:02
71,923
-31
25 Aug 2026, 05:18
71,954
-15
24 Aug 2026, 03:45
71,969
-12
21 Aug 2026, 04:22
71,981
-53
20 Aug 2026, 01:21
72,034
first reading
Engagement
209 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 93 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.0%
avg views ÷ 71,421 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,990
137 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
137
of 209 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held
209 (31 July 2026 – 20 September 2026)
Views total
1,368,150
Reactions total
114,144
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
21 Sept 2026, 00:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7,600
Videos
≈1,660
Links
≈7,710
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
31m 43s
Average length
54s
Measured directly from 35 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
174,962 reactions across 201 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
39,914
22.8%
💯
37,998
21.7%
😁
26,305
15.0%
👍
13,945
7.97%
🙏
11,082
6.33%
🤬
9,856
5.63%
🤯
9,768
5.58%
🔥
7,606
4.35%
😢
3,471
1.98%
😱
3,436
1.96%
👀
2,851
1.63%
🤡
2,328
1.33%
🎉
1,684
0.962%
😭
997
0.57%
👎
966
0.552%
🥴
681
0.389%
💩
503
0.287%
🤮
496
0.283%
🥱
249
0.142%
⚡
195
0.111%
6 further kinds
631
0.361%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 208 of the 209 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 181,531 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 209 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
31
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 208 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vpokoe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 209 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 20 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.91%
4 of 209 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
4
posts carrying an erid · 4 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
10,100
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
10,600
over 204 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vfnxx8Xeqr
1
8 September 2026
8 September 2026
2VfnxyQFeqH
1
25 August 2026
25 August 2026
2Vtzqwzib79
1
26 August 2026
26 August 2026
2W5zFGwFUQH
1
13 August 2026
13 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 209 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 20 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
По результатам подсчета более 20% протоколов на выборах в Госдуму лидирует «Единая Россия», следует их данных ЦИК России.
К 22:00 мск было посчитано 20,82% протоколов. В результате голоса на выборах распределились следующим образом:
▪️ «Единая Россия» — 57,07%
▪️ КПРФ — 14,04%
▪️ ЛДПР — 9,31%
▪️ «Новые люди» — 7,93%
▪️ «Справедливая Россия» — 5,14%
▪️ Российская партия пенсионеров за социальную справедливость — 2,0…
Об сегодняшней атаке на Москву.
И вообще, самое идиотское, что они могли придумать — атаковать столицу в день выборов. Тех самых выборов, какие у себя проводить не собираются.
Мы переживаем, что наше руководство вдруг начнёт жалеть хохлов к зиме. Хохлы делают всё, чтобы не начали. Удивительная «нация»!
Пост пользы и напоминание о наших друзьях «Проорганик» (низкий поклон доктору Роберту за контакт и продукт высокого качества).
Осень, как известно, проверяет нас на прочность тремя способами: отоплением, вирусами и отражением в зеркале. Кожа сохнет, волосы изображают временное присутствие, ногти требуют политического убежища, а вокруг все деликатно кашляют в ладонь.
Именно в этот сезон мне обычно вспоминают про цин…
В регионах, в каких регулярная воздушная опасность, спрашиваю у местных: орёт сирена и что вы делаете? «Ничего. Или пугаемся, или привыкли, но какие действия от нас ждут — неведомо.»
У меня сложилось впечатление, что жуткие смс и сирены для того, чтобы сообщить жителям: «Вы вероятно умрёте, приготовьтесь. А не, пронесло». Очевидно, это какой-то ненормальный посыл и есть адекватная инструкция.
Военные ребята выслали…
Новости со школьных полей. Увеличение нагрузки на 140 часов для старших классов.
Я не очень понимаю, что читаю и как считать. Михаил Богданов @aboutschools обьясни нам, как замдиректора крупной питерской школы — мы правильно понимаем, что у детей теперь будет ещё больше уроков и они будут более «прикладные», чем «теоретические» и что это значит?
Моя дочь с начала сентября вообще не видится с подругами. У них в 9 к…
Из приятного. Сообщение о возмутительных методичках в школах, где многодетность признана фактором неблагополучия семьи, вызывает возмущение не только у замшелых нас.
Буквально пару лет назад спора «почему многодетные не оборванные маргиналы» просто не существовало. Всем было очевидно, что много детей — отвратительно и неосознанно.
Хороший маркер позитивных изменений! И, конечно, вопрос почему именно в Минпрос (како…
В чате снова переживают.
Избирательный участок находится в поликлинике, что там могут предложить из развлечений?🤔
Не знаю как на счёт развлечений, девочки, но Россия официально признана ВОЗ страной с самой низкой смертностью от диареи.
И это без смеха показатель и уровня жизни и уровня медицины. В большинстве остальных стран всё чуть хужее со всем этим по совокупности.
Поэтому, кроме просто голосования наши поли…
Сегодня приехала внучка-куратор. Озвучиваю программу выходных: в пятницу на скалодром сходим, пирог испечём; в субботу на выборы; в воскресенье с утра в храм причащаться.
Тревожное молчание и комментарий: «А всё думала, откуда эти бабки с пирожками, хождениями на выборы и Церквью берутся...»
Всё, дорогие мои. Всё.
😂😂😂
Вначале надо рассказать, как многодетные оказались в официальной «социально опасной группе».
Удивительно (нет), но факт: списки «социально опасных» продвигали британские уважаемые леди и скандинавские продвинутые леди с конца 90-х и до 2022 года. Несколько снизили активность в 2019-м, когда мы отбили закон о семейно-бытовом насилии и привлекли внимание к их деятельности в целом, к методичкам, грантовым проектам, экс…
Нам пишут с правильными выводами:
В школе старшей дочери выдали вот такие опросник для составления «социального портрета» класса. И вот как в этом опроснике значится многодетная семья.. А мы как раз многодетные. Честно- так неприятно, будто носом макнули пренебрежительно(( О каком статусе и «моде» на многодетность, о которых нам вещают аки радива всевозможные ведомства, можно говорить, когда тут такое. Пока не начн…
Что с делом Глискова
Сегодня прошло заседание в Центральном суде. Перед началом экс-депутат рассказал «Проспекту Мира», что когда с него сняли домашний арест, он впервые за долгое время смог позвонить своей 84-летней матери, которая живёт в Туапсе и из-за возраста не может приехать в Красноярск.
Глисков признался, что ему пока морально сложно куда-то ходить и с кем-то встречаться. Он успел лишь встретиться с нескол…
🙏903❤164👀34😭6🤬4😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 209 posts we hold for @vpokoe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@vpokoe edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 209 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 20 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 43 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ИММУННЫЙ ОТВЕТ @imotvet · 60,627 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
Мария Шукшина @mariashukshina · 152,930 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
ШАФРАН @annashafran · 48,103 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
KATIA TXI @KatiaTxiLive · 103,515 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
НОВОСТИ - Родители Москвы @roditelimoskvynews · 25,028 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Историк в телефоне @history_doronina · 49,534 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
Письма в стол📝 | Литература @Letters_in_the_Desk · 70,362 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
Ольга Кормухина @olgakormukhina · 25,780 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 September 2026
Borisenko Dmitriy @borisenkoD · 111,854 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
KATIA TXI • LIVES @TxiLives · 22,826 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 19 September 2026
📚О правах детей и родителей📚 Alina_malina_pravo @malina_pravo · 25,071 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 September 2026
Будьте здоровы! А.Редько @budte_zdorovi_vse · 33,161 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
💭Инсайтовская форточка @garikovainsight · 23,823 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 September 2026
Lenel_ya @lenel_ya · 41,409 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
Лариса Суркова - larangsovet @larangsovetme · 112,374 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
Ольга Четверикова | Официальный канал @ONCHETVERIKOVA · 31,141 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
Римма Карамова @karamova_fm · 31,191 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
Доктор Роберт и окрестности. @Dr_RobertM · 38,835 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
ГЕОСТРАТЕГ @geostrategrus · 124,751 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Валентина Магеря @valentina_magerya · 33,208 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
Блондинка с укаZкой @proistoriyZ · 24,676 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 September 2026
НЕСЮ НЕСЁТ | ЭКОРАЗНОС @the_nesya · 40,778 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
ПАВЕЛ ПАШКОВ @pavel_v_doroge · 39,618 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
ТЗС (Правозащитное Сообщество Торжества Здравого Смысла) @victoria_de_communi_sensu · 23,979 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026
This channel appears in 103 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Оставьте нас в покое” (@vpokoe), 71,421 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vpokoe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.