International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 23% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 91 days, net -1,385. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 70,771–72,572 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 15:26
70,979
-11
3 Nov 2026, 15:16
70,990
-20
2 Nov 2026, 11:59
71,010
-14
1 Nov 2026, 14:49
71,024
-12
31 Oct 2026, 17:46
71,036
-1
30 Oct 2026, 20:27
71,037
+49
29 Oct 2026, 23:47
70,988
-16
28 Oct 2026, 22:05
71,004
-24
27 Oct 2026, 17:37
71,028
-18
26 Oct 2026, 20:30
71,046
-28
25 Oct 2026, 22:25
71,074
-51
25 Oct 2026, 00:27
71,125
-8
24 Oct 2026, 02:16
71,133
-14
23 Oct 2026, 01:51
71,147
+1
22 Oct 2026, 00:45
71,146
+42
20 Oct 2026, 18:40
71,104
-19
19 Oct 2026, 15:59
71,123
-22
18 Oct 2026, 15:48
71,145
-1
17 Oct 2026, 13:15
71,146
-4
16 Oct 2026, 14:16
71,150
first reading
Engagement
445 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 182 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.7%
avg views ÷ 70,979 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,760
155 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
155
of 445 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
445 (31 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
1,512,260
Reactions total
115,578
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 20:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7,750
Videos
≈1,720
Links
≈7,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 23m
Average length
1m 32s
Measured directly from 94 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
360,158 reactions across 437 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
75,518
21.0%
❤
72,098
20.0%
😁
62,128
17.3%
🤬
25,109
6.97%
👍
24,005
6.67%
🤯
23,659
6.57%
🔥
17,637
4.90%
🙏
16,115
4.47%
😱
11,379
3.16%
😢
7,643
2.12%
👀
5,541
1.54%
🤡
4,234
1.18%
🎉
3,673
1.02%
🥴
2,773
0.77%
👎
1,863
0.517%
😭
1,719
0.477%
💩
1,021
0.283%
🤮
944
0.262%
🥰
901
0.25%
💊
728
0.202%
6 further kinds
1,470
0.408%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 444 of the 445 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 366,727 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 445 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
56
across the posts below
Posts paid on
38
of 444 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vpokoe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 445 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.70%
12 of 445 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
12
posts carrying an erid · 12 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
9,150
over 12 measured posts
Median views · rest
10,100
over 432 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VSb5xHgRKQ
1
27 September 2026
27 September 2026
2VSb5yg6FHt
1
26 October 2026
26 October 2026
2VSb5z7L3bG
1
30 September 2026
30 September 2026
2Vfnxx8Xeqr
1
8 September 2026
8 September 2026
2VfnxyQFeqH
1
25 August 2026
25 August 2026
2VtzqvYKxdb
1
13 October 2026
13 October 2026
2VtzqvdkHt2
1
29 October 2026
29 October 2026
2VtzqwL3Bhn
1
24 September 2026
24 September 2026
2Vtzqwzib79
1
26 August 2026
26 August 2026
2W5zFGGh2wL
1
27 October 2026
27 October 2026
2W5zFGhwKPo
1
8 October 2026
8 October 2026
2W5zFGwFUQH
1
13 August 2026
13 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 445 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 34 of 155 posts held from the last 30 days (21.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Вечерне-ночным чатом будет мое изумление статистикой и комментариями в ВК с поздравлением с Днем Народного единства.
https://vk.ru/wall-212951323_279
Меня там немного похвалили, но в основном:
▪️прокляли
▪️рассказали историю СССР и обозвали французским иноагентом
▪️обьяснили, что Россия полное говно.
▪️обвинили в использовании ИИ
Я впечатлена 😂😂😂 мне нравятся эти ребята
😂😂😂
С другой стороны, в личку написали а) с…
Когда взял слишком высокую планку 😂😂😂 Варвара с учителем английского перешли к чтению медицинских статей и что из этого вышло.
Мы давно (и как оказалось правильно) отказались от типичных уроков изучения иноземных языков, когда учитель, поправляя очки давит грамматикой, а ученик что-то зубрит. Лучший формат для подростка — делать любимое дело в дружеской беседе с приятным человеком. Но на английском.
Иногда складыва…
Испытывать единение страны и жить «просто так», без объяснения сверху высшего смысла нельзя. Надо по ГОСТу.
НинСанна, глава комитета по семье в ГД, обьявила чудесную по своей свежести новость. Дело в том, что депутаты прописали наказание за отрицание традиционных ценностей «что такое плохо», но не прописали, «что такое хорошо».
Поэтому в ближайшее время мы, наконец-то узнаем, как надо правильно себя вести. 100 млн …
Меня, как историка-любителя, всегда будоражил факт, что тысячи семей с разным цветом глаз и формой носов, уникальной кухней, верой и мифологией делают выбор войти в некое единое пространство. И тем самым определяют свою судьбу.
Одно дело войти, но другое — удержаться в нем. Люди рвут на части друг друга из-за кастрюли в коммуналках, а тут — тысячу лет терпеть друг друга и дорости до самой большой страны в мире (даже…
Рейв в библиотеке это фигня. Борцы за чистоту нации всегда идут до конца и пятой точкой найдут корень зла.
Буйный общественик Бородин призывает запретить пиццу
Моя позиция жёсткая и бескомпромиссная: пиццу необходимо запретить! Начать нужно со школьных и студенческих столовых. Хватит кормить наших детей чужим!
Завтра день Народного Единства, а тут иноземный общепит. Вначале пицца, потом Хэллоуин, потом иноагентство…
Сообщают, что:
Православная общественность и Z-блогеры требуют уволить руководство Ленинки за «литературный рейв»
Под прицелом критики оказалось руководство главной библиотеки страны.
В прошедшую субботу Ленинка при поддержке издательства «Эксмо-АСТ» организовала пятичасовой «ЛитРЕЙВ». Все было более чем цивильно: посетители были одетыми и даже вполне прилично, на входе их проверяли охранники, алкогольных напитков…
Сегодня ночью произошла мощная заварушка в Киеве. Рассказываю, что это было:
1. Народ собрался у некой незаконной пыточной тюрьмы, в ней пытали и издевались над людьми, удерживая их и вымогая деньги. Тюрьму обнаружила женщина-медик.
2. Шум разгорается настолько сильный, что на место приезжает аж целый Буданов, глава Офиса Президента.
3. Ситуация закручивается: толпа проникает внутрь здания и вытаскивает покалеченн…
Какой тонкий момент.
Стрекозы, у которых вместо личных границ личный бетонный забор, до сих пор пребывают в святой уверенности, что будущего нет.
Я исключительно за то, что у человека есть личная воля и индивидуальные желаний (с этим согласны все), но и вся полнота ответственности за свой выбор (с этим согласны немногие).
Потом все эти стрекозы ходят среди муравьев и злобно машут поломатыми крыльями: «буржуи, вы м…
Мы с мужем: да. ДА! ДАДА!
Старший дети: Му-ха-ха, это мы у бабули!
Младшая дочь: 😳 в чем прикол?
Вечерне-ночного чата нам. Скоро мы будем находить друг друга по коврам, часам со стрелками и телефонным циферблатам.
Мужчин в их максимально мужском (т. е военном проявлении) мы сегодня обсудили. Теперь к ультра-женскому.
Зачем женщина ходит на массаж лица? Она (кроме вечной молодости) ждёт решения двух задач:
▪️Припухлость лица от утреннего пробуждения, селёдки и «до 35 такого дерьма не было».
▪️Убрать следы нервов, дурного настроения и страданий от несовершенства жизни.
Утр (как множественное число?), селедки и окружающих дебил…
Мой дед начфин, свекор комдив, муж военный инженер, сын военный медик. К военному юмору я привычная и даже сдерживаюсь, чтобы вас до истерики не довести.
Но когда-то, по юности, меня убила некая армейская история. Типо с юмором, но про армейские будни.
Короче, 90е, когда служили 2 года. Срочники-спецназовцы. Набирали их так: на пункт военого сбора приезжает специальный дядя, какой отбирает от 180см мясистых парней …
❤652🔥396😁119👍48👎10👀9🥴4💩2
Showing the 12 most recent of 445 posts we hold for @vpokoe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@vpokoe edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 October 2026
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 445 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 51 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@vpokoe named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@tsargradtv named in 2 posts, 31 October 2026 – 2 November 2026 · confirmed gone 15 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ДУМАем Z @dumayem · 19,325 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 October 2026
ИММУННЫЙ ОТВЕТ @imotvet · 60,473 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
Мария Шукшина @mariashukshina · 151,755 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
Макароновирус по-флотски @pastafleet · 18,804 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 October 2026
ШАФРАН @annashafran · 47,432 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
KATIA TXI @KatiaTxiLive · 102,655 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
НОВОСТИ - Родители Москвы @roditelimoskvynews · 24,993 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Историк в телефоне @history_doronina · 49,012 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
Письма в стол📝 | Литература @Letters_in_the_Desk · 70,006 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
Ольга Кормухина @olgakormukhina · 25,600 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 September 2026
❤️🩹 Валяева Ольга ❤️ Исцеляя сердца @olgavalyaeva · 20,414 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 September 2026
РВС (Родительское Всероссийское Сопротивление) @RVSsu · 22,200 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 September 2026
Borisenko Dmitriy @borisenkoD · 111,772 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
KATIA TXI • LIVES @TxiLives · 22,729 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 19 September 2026
📚О правах детей и родителей📚 Alina_malina_pravo @malina_pravo · 25,066 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 September 2026
Будьте здоровы! А.Редько @budte_zdorovi_vse · 33,565 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
💭Инсайтовская форточка @garikovainsight · 23,389 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 September 2026
Lenel_ya @lenel_ya · 40,700 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
Лариса Суркова - larangsovet @larangsovetme · 110,652 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
Ольга Четверикова | Официальный канал @ONCHETVERIKOVA · 31,385 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
Римма Карамова @karamova_fm · 31,295 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
Доктор Роберт и окрестности. @Dr_RobertM · 38,900 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
ГЕОСТРАТЕГ @geostrategrus · 123,769 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Валентина Магеря @valentina_magerya · 32,871 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 111 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Оставьте нас в покое” (@vpokoe), 70,979 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vpokoe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.