Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мнение

Channel

Мнение

@otzivSPb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

667subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001216256983
TypeChannel
Username@otzivSPb
Created16 February 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/otzivSPb

Growth

663672667.56 August 2026 — 672 subscribers6 August 2026 — 672 subscribers15 August 2026 — 670 subscribers21 August 2026 — 668 subscribers27 August 2026 — 667 subscribers3 September 2026 — 663 subscribers11 September 2026 — 667 subscribers6676 August 202611 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 36 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 662–673 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 09:59667+4
3 Sept 2026, 10:15663-4
27 Aug 2026, 09:28667-1
21 Aug 2026, 09:49668-2
15 Aug 2026, 08:07670-2
6 Aug 2026, 16:40672no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:51672first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

93 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯2729.0%
🔥2122.6%
😱1010.8%
🤔1010.8%
🤡99.68%
😁88.60%
🙏33.23%
🤬33.23%
11.08%
👍11.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC36 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

В чем собственно разница с организациями, которые спонсирует запад? Они все получали зарплаты западными грантами, а всем говорили что живут на донаты.

💯2

6 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC37 viewsread 6 August 2026

Спивак молодец. В семьи лезть, ковыряться в них можно и нужно, а в НКО незяяя! Позиция номер 1 про семьи : "Из интервью с А. Спиваком ясно, что вмешиваться, по Фонду, надо в любые семьи, в которых случились «трудности» («не хватает внутреннего ресурса»), а их чиновник может прикинуть на глазок: и поскольку каждое вмешательство — это услуга (а это деньги), глазок будет работать на выискивание «ранних» проблем там, г

6 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC50 viewsread 6 August 2026

-Запрос общества на перемены? Избавление от западного ига? Семье сбережения? -Какого общества?

6 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC45 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ouzs_ruPhoto

📌❗ В СОСТАВ ОБЩЕСТВЕННО-ЭКСПЕРТНОГО СОВЕТА ПРИ УПР ВКЛЮЧИЛИ ЮВЕНАЛЬЩИКА СО СТАЖЕМ, ЭКС-ПАРТНЕРА USAID* СПИВАКА. ПРОСИМ ЛЬВОВУ-БЕЛОВУ ПРИНЯТЬ МЕРЫ! Недавно стало известно, что в состав Общественно-экспертного совета при Уполномоченном по правам ребенка при Президенте РФ вошел глава Национального фонда защиты детей от жестокого обращения А.П. Спивак. Это какой-то сюрреализм не далее, как в прошлом году ОУЗС требовал о

🤬3😱3

6 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC61 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Какие интересные хитросплетения. Карьера аж целого Лаврова и Собянина в руках киднепера Тимофеева из Сольцов. Ну надо же … вот это поворот. Хорошая попытка, но нет. Партия ЕР, в народе #едро_киднеперов потеряло лицо в лице Тимофеева. Воровать сирот из семьи погибшего бойца СВО это за гранью добра и зла. СК Москвы пять раз возбуждало уголовные дела. Прокуратура Сольцов пять раз закрывала. Местный суд, где судья жена р

💯5

6 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC65 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Если бы мне сказали об этом два года назад, я бы ужаснулась и не поверила. Вы вдумайтесь в это. Родить от уже мертвого человека. Мммм мечта любой женщины . https://t.me/ivan4pointru/33651

😱7

6 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC68 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я вчера поймала себя на мысли, что мы все больше похожи на Азию. Количество самокатов, велосипедов, мопедов и мотороллеров на тротуарах уже превышает количество пешеходов. Разница только в том, что это на тротуаре, а не на дороге.

💯7👍1

6 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC67 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Рубрика #комментируйте_сами

🤡9

6 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC64 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @botcharovVideo

Лос-Анджелес, Калифорния. Цена: 1 495 000 долларов США. 3 спальни, 0 ванных комнат. Уникальный многоэтажный особняк с архитектурными особенностями, предлагающий планировку открытого типа, панорамный вид на город, превосходную вентиляцию, неограниченные возможности для расширения и высококачественную отделку. В стоимость включены: тележка для покупок, душевая кабина на открытом воздухе с имитацией дождя

🔥5

5 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC97 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Мой шок в шоке Вы знали, что кукла на свадебном авто означает что невеста беременна? И пошло это с начала 19 века? Теперь знаете https://youtu.be/0I_OSFKpCo8?si=R7v2i3Mo7KiZRJmC

🤔7

5 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC91 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @realgoodmannPhoto

Помните чувака из мема, который сидит с кривой улыбкой за столом, а в глазах - вселенская боль и принятие неизбежного? Того самого «Гарольда, скрывающего боль». Так вот, 81-летний венгерский электрик Андраш Арато внезапно победил в народном опросе и метит в президенты Венгрии. Господи, да это идеальный кандидат. Человек, чье лицо - единственный честный комментарий ко всему пиздецу, что происходит в мире последние ле

😁8

5 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC94 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @brekotin_sergeyPhoto

Сегодня были официально озвучены масштабные кадровые перестановки в Министерстве обороны. Ключевой момент этих назначений — на руководящие должности приходят не кабинетные управленцы, а офицеры, которые зарекомендовали себя в ходе боевых действий. Именно успешным командирам доверяют управление ключевыми направлениями: вооружением, тыловым обеспечением, группировками войск и формированием нового рода войск — войск бе

🔥12🙏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @otzivSPb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ПАРФЕНТЬЕВ.КЛУБ 🇷🇺
@parfentiev_club · 33,873
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
⚠️ Общественный уполномоченный по защите семьи (ОУЗС)
@ouzs_ru · 74,992
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
Оставьте нас в покое
@vpokoe · 71,637
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мнение” (@otzivSPb), 667 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/otzivSPb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.