Channel
@za_cto_ban
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
380subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001829705284 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @za_cto_ban |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/za_cto_ban |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 380 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 381 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 382 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 382 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 13 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
315 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤪 | 120 | 38.1% | |
| 🤡 | 61 | 19.4% | |
| 🎃 | 40 | 12.7% | |
| 💅 | 38 | 12.1% | |
| 🍓 | 14 | 4.44% | |
| 🌭 | 12 | 3.81% | |
| 💊 | 11 | 3.49% | |
| 🍌 | 10 | 3.17% | |
| 🦄 | 9 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 315 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2025 to 16 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Смотрю, набег «элиты» продолжается, и мы уже заждались, когда же наши доблестные органы привлекут этих благородных господ за их тонкие намеки, которые почему-то звучат как разжигание розни.
🤪15🦄5🌭2💅2🎃1
Наверное, это высшее проявление заботы — когда "лучшие люди страны" заходят в гости, чтобы поделиться своей богатой внутренней культурой через столь изысканные пожелания.
🤪25💅3🎃2🦄2🌭1
О, какие ценные гости пожаловали к нам в чат! Не каждый день в наших скромных беседах участвуют столь прогрессивные личности, искренне желающие нам всяческих… приключений.
💊10🤡8🤪3🍌2🦄2🎃1
Ааааа! Меня забанили у Машковой просто так!😋 Это не демократично! Ноль свободы слова!🤨 За что же такие почести? Не за блестящие умы, не за тонкий юмор, не за искусство элегантно сформулированной мысли, нет! Всё гораздо прозаичнее, но оттого не менее захватывающе. За хамское поведение банят, дамы и господа! За оскорбления. Представляете? Бан — это вершина иерархии, привилегия, которую нужно еще заслужить. Это как олим…
🍓14🎃8💅4
Прекрасный залётный лопушок по теме поста о повышении штрафа по статье 5.35 залетал. Люди, читающие жопой, и пишущие в подобном бездоказательном стиле, удаляются без промедления. Пожелав админу гулять, ссыкливо сбежал, не дождавшись ответа😄
🤡14💅12🍌3🌭1🎃1
Недобиток в чате.
🤪27🍌5🎃4💅3
Когда у зоошизы заканчивается методичка и ответить нечего — начинаются подобные аргументы. Дикое.
🤪20🌭7🤡3💅2
Вообще, очень любопытно, что именно двигает людьми, которые приходят, чтоб соврать или насыпать домыслов?🤔 Зашла, обвинила, по стандарту пошла в личку с оскорблениями. Будни админа — они такие.
🤡16💅8🤪5💊1
Зоошиза так мило хочет государственных денюшек и кучу приютов для бездомных собак. Жизнь ребенка для барышни не имеет ценности. То ли дело — собаки🫠
🤡20🤪9🎃4🌭1💅1
Да, Надежда Борисовна, подобные высеры в чате, конечно же, будут блокироваться. Потому как утомили накидывать на вентилятор. Такой сленг у доктора — это шедевр, конечно😁 Стоило бы задуматься, что пишете в открытых чатах, что вас везде блокируют.
🎃19🤪16💅3
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @za_cto_ban. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“За что меня забанили у Машковой?” (@za_cto_ban), 380 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/za_cto_ban.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.