Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Не Гербалайф.

Channel

Не Гербалайф.

@ariilsmeals

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,131subscribers

+414 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001522574265
TypeChannel
Username@ariilsmeals
DescriptionХочешь разжиреть? Спроси меня как.
Created7 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ariilsmeals

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

15,71516,15415,934.56 August 2026 — 15,717 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,715 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,747 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,792 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,812 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,814 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,816 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,819 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,813 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,812 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,809 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,810 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,813 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,814 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,818 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,819 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,816 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,819 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,822 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,826 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,847 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,851 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,852 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,857 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,862 subscribers8 September 2026 — 15,941 subscribers11 September 2026 — 15,960 subscribers13 September 2026 — 16,001 subscribers14 September 2026 — 16,011 subscribers16 September 2026 — 16,039 subscribers18 September 2026 — 16,049 subscribers25 September 2026 — 16,077 subscribers4 October 2026 — 16,064 subscribers8 October 2026 — 16,077 subscribers13 October 2026 — 16,108 subscribers14 October 2026 — 16,130 subscribers15 October 2026 — 16,145 subscribers16 October 2026 — 16,149 subscribers17 October 2026 — 16,154 subscribers18 October 2026 — 16,145 subscribers19 October 2026 — 16,141 subscribers20 October 2026 — 16,143 subscribers21 October 2026 — 16,142 subscribers22 October 2026 — 16,139 subscribers23 October 2026 — 16,143 subscribers24 October 2026 — 16,135 subscribers25 October 2026 — 16,132 subscribers26 October 2026 — 16,139 subscribers27 October 2026 — 16,150 subscribers29 October 2026 — 16,141 subscribers31 October 2026 — 16,138 subscribers1 November 2026 — 16,133 subscribers2 November 2026 — 16,132 subscribers3 November 2026 — 16,135 subscribers4 November 2026 — 16,134 subscribers5 November 2026 — 16,138 subscribers6 November 2026 — 16,131 subscribers16,1316 August 20266 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 92 days, net +414. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,649–16,220 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 10:0516,131-7
5 Nov 2026, 08:5916,138+4
4 Nov 2026, 04:5616,134-1
3 Nov 2026, 07:1916,135+3
2 Nov 2026, 06:0716,132-1
1 Nov 2026, 06:2916,133-5
31 Oct 2026, 09:5616,138-3
29 Oct 2026, 08:1616,141-9
27 Oct 2026, 08:3816,150+11
26 Oct 2026, 09:5116,139+7
25 Oct 2026, 09:3616,132-3
24 Oct 2026, 11:4916,135-8
23 Oct 2026, 09:3516,143+4
22 Oct 2026, 12:4816,139-3
21 Oct 2026, 04:0016,142-1
20 Oct 2026, 05:0816,143+2
19 Oct 2026, 06:2116,141-4
18 Oct 2026, 09:5116,145-9
17 Oct 2026, 10:3816,154+5
16 Oct 2026, 12:5416,149first reading

Engagement

71 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.6%
avg views ÷ 16,131 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,410
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 71 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held71 (25 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total92,040
Reactions total2,996
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 16:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,690
Videos
≈202
Links
≈572

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 19s
Average length
1m 03s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

11,107 reactions across 68 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4,34839.1%
😁3,03927.4%
🔥2,01518.1%
custom 54722347926594580027196.47%
👍5785.20%
👎2492.24%
✍1591.43%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,718 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
33
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 71 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ariilsmeals. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 71 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.41%
1 of 71 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
7,400
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
6,750
over 70 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFJhbdoP11 August 20261 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 15:23 UTC≈3,460 views200 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

😁107custom 547223479265945800246🔥24❤20👎2👍1

5 Nov 2026, 12:36 UTC≈4,040 views82 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Напомню, кто во всём виноват.

😁53❤21custom 54722347926594580028

5 Nov 2026, 11:43 UTC≈4,410 views114 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Я бы тоже уволил. Пусть у себя дома выпендривается.

😁90❤9custom 54722347926594580029👍6

4 Nov 2026, 17:27 UTC≈5,170 views180 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Так ни разу и не попробовал «дубайский шоколад», но мимо этой красотки не мог пройти 😬

😁135🔥28❤17

3 Nov 2026, 12:08 UTC≈5,150 views98 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Я, конечно, не веган, но я видел, откуда берётся мясо, приятного там мало. И вот такие приколы не очень понимаю. Кто-то скажет, а в чем разница с той же курицей? Разница в том, что из одной курицы можно приготовить обед на семью с первым и вторым, а тут на один перекус десяток птичек. Вот и вся разница.

👍69❤28✍1

3 Nov 2026, 11:41 UTC≈5,080 views171 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Это асфур аль-тин, она же славка-черноголовка, она же фиговый воробей, потому что прилетает в страны Леванта в период созревания инжира и других фруктов, активно обжирается листьями и спелыми плодами, жиреет, приобретает сладкий вкус, после чего становится вкусным шашлычком.

👎92❤40😁23custom 54722347926594580027👍6🔥3

3 Nov 2026, 11:26 UTC≈4,900 views108 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Выглядит вкусно, согласитесь?

🔥61👎26custom 547223479265945800214👍7

2 Nov 2026, 15:17 UTC≈5,150 views163 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Короче, ближайшие два месяца «Не Гербалайф.» базируется в Rebellion The Palace of Youth. Вместе с ребятами мы приготовили три блюда из золотого фонда моих рецептов: тыквенный кекс, шоколадный чизкейк и сэндвич с окороком и зелёным соусом. Эти блюда уже неоднократно проверены многими из вас, но теперь их можно будет попробовать в исполнении команды Rebellion. Приходите в Rebellion в Хамовниках. Это место, где полови…

❤110👍28🔥19✍6

2 Nov 2026, 14:44 UTC≈4,940 views156 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Хотите бутер?

❤108🔥38custom 54722347926594580029✍1

1 Nov 2026, 07:50 UTC≈5,640 views504 reactions4 Starsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Примите мои поздравления! В этот день много лет назад у вас появился я. Поздравляю вас с этим замечательным днём! А себя с тем, что за свою жизнь смог собрать рядом столько классных людей. Спасибо вам большое ❤️

❤338🔥97custom 547223479265945800254👍6😁5👎4

31 Oct 2026, 15:14 UTC≈5,860 views245 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Photo

Пару недель назад увидел вот такой statement в ленте, ну и вы меня знаете, не сдержался. Но за всем этим карго-культом невооружённым взглядом просматривались ещё одни упоротые энтузиасты, которые поливают картошку фри homemade ketchup и готовы варить «оригинальный» Buffalo sauce from scratch, хотя в самих штатах все его готовят из бутылочного Frank's RedHot и half a stick of сливочного масла. Короче, место получило…

😁154❤72👍19

30 Oct 2026, 13:36 UTC≈8,210 views325 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

В инстике попался умилительный ролик, как эти ребята всю ночь пекут булки, чтобы по выходным в формате поп-апа продавать их в Cazaban Bistro на Серпуховской площади. Ехал мимо, не мог не зайти. Всегда готов поддерживать упоротых фанатиков, особенно когда продукт стоит того. Обожрался вкусным тестом, сижу довольный. Пусть у них все получится. Уникальных и независимых мест должно быть больше.

❤237🔥49👍30✍9

Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @ariilsmeals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Breaking Bread
@dushnilabezmichelina · 39,173
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
Егор Тарнакин
@egortarnakin · 31,549
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 6 September 2026
dacooker_
@Dacookersminds · 90,717
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
mishanavina
@mishanavina · 24,842
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 September 2026
Eda.ru
@edaruofficial · 22,763
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 September 2026
POYA Kitchen!
@poyakitchen · 21,945
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 September 2026
Открытая кухня | Яндекс Еда
@otkrytaya_kuhnya · 57,464
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
psycho daily
@psychodaily · 18,946
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 October 2026
Журнал Соль
@thesaltmagazine · 147,989
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Трапезник
@trapeznick · 44,105
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
Энди шеф — бесплатные рецепты
@blog_andychef · 117,224
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Chef Vasily Emelianenko
@chefvasiliy · 113
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
Просто Про Пиво
@prostopropivo · 29,470
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 September 2026
BeautifulFood. Рецепты для поваров и кондитеров
@kolbasina_food · 30,927
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 6 September 2026
Лёгкий быт с Аидой Prodom
@aidaprodom · 317,533
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 August 2026
FOODISCOVERY
@foodiscovery · 27,000
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Не Гербалайф.” (@ariilsmeals), 16,131 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ariilsmeals.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.