Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 93 days, net -273. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,793–25,215 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 12:57
24,862
+3
7 Nov 2026, 10:15
24,859
+17
6 Nov 2026, 09:07
24,842
-14
5 Nov 2026, 07:49
24,856
-5
4 Nov 2026, 08:39
24,861
-14
3 Nov 2026, 08:09
24,875
-15
2 Nov 2026, 06:49
24,890
-24
1 Nov 2026, 07:37
24,914
-12
31 Oct 2026, 05:41
24,926
-3
30 Oct 2026, 04:00
24,929
-10
29 Oct 2026, 06:55
24,939
+2
28 Oct 2026, 06:37
24,937
-5
27 Oct 2026, 08:21
24,942
-11
26 Oct 2026, 10:20
24,953
+3
25 Oct 2026, 13:06
24,950
+2
23 Oct 2026, 14:27
24,948
-1
22 Oct 2026, 14:17
24,949
-2
21 Oct 2026, 07:00
24,951
-3
20 Oct 2026, 07:56
24,954
-1
19 Oct 2026, 11:06
24,955
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 18 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 132 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
40.7%
avg views ÷ 24,862 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,100
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
22 (18 March 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
30,390
Reactions total
2,116
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 00:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
130
Videos
75
Links
63
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
9m 45s
Average length
42s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
26,064 reactions across 22 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
20,585
79.0%
custom 5287251092386626340
3,258
12.5%
😁
2,221
8.52%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26,064 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
33
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 22 we hold a reading for · 77%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mishanavina. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 March 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
total look от @limestorecom
(и чепчик на Василисе тоже)
вся посуда с котятами и цветами от @odaryadarya_ceramics
контейнер большой
контейнер поменьше
разделочные доски из композита
сковорода (из набора ingenio)
ингредиенты для соуса (на 500 г продукта):
кочукару (корейский красный перец) — 1 ст. л.
чеснок — 2 зубчика
соевый соус — 1 ст. л.
рисовый уксус — 1 ст. л.
рыбный соус — 1 ч. л.
сахар — 1 ч. л.
кунжутное мас…
эту тарелку сделала для меня @Odaryadarya_ceramics
наши маркеты усеяны исключительно небольшими версиями, подходящими разве что для натирания чеснока/имбиря.
а я несколько лет мечтала об огромной!
и вот — спасибо Дарье! — моя мечта исполнилась!
ингредиенты:
буратта
томаты
огурцы
базилик листья
масло авокадо
клубника
соль
хлопья красного перца
пудра малины (подкрасила томатную массу, а то мне цвет не понравился, ма…
важное уточнение! Василиса всё так ест, от банана до котлет, первый укус всегда такой, далее она понимает, что вкусно, и продолжает есть.
а трендовый салат действительно достоин внимания (много белка):
зерненый творог
помидоры
петрушка
лук красный
песто
соль
разделочные доски из композита
нож самозатачивающийся
тарелки с красным кантом
овощерезка
повязка на голову
блюдо сервировочное
что за инженер придумал это?
получилось неожиданно вкусно!
посуду сделала для меня @Odaryadarya_ceramics
на тарелках изображены Бася, Фоксик и, конечно же, Мишенька ❤️
пресс для картофеля
овощерезка
ковш из набора ingenio
ингредиенты:
картофель (отварила в мундире);
моцарелла для пиццы;
соль;
перец;
хлеб для тостов;
вода (для смачивания хлеба);
крахмал (для обваливания);
масло (для фритюра).
запаслись топливом впрок. Басилий, как всегда, для большей красоты.
а вы чем запасаетесь?
напишу про важный опыт перевода Василисы с ГВ на ИВ.
кому-то точно пригодится.
1. основная проблема при переходе на смесь — проблема с пищеварением.
пойду предметно (извините, дело такое, без конкретики не обойтись):
на NAN (вся линейка от supreme до кисломолочной… и что там еще?) — запор;
на Nutrilak — запор;
на Kabrita — сту…
есть можно бесконечно, постарайтесь съесть за один день.
ингредиенты:
огурцы;
соль;
рисовый уксус для суши;
кунжутное масло;
обжаренный кунжут.
❤1,510custom 5287251092386626340169😁88
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @mishanavina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @mishanavina as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
18 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
18 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 months
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Alena.Mad @alena_mad0 · 65,383 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
Sasha Hov @sasha_hov1 · 30,578 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 6 September 2026
Елена Ландэ @elenalande_chef · 72,590 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
Монахова @monakhovana · 85,225 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
batonobelka вещает 🥐 @batonobelka_talks · 22,068 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“mishanavina” (@mishanavina), 24,862 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mishanavina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
