Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Юрист РФ 77

Channel

Юрист РФ 77

@urcentr77

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,933subscribers

+108 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001147875162
TypeChannel
Username@urcentr77
DescriptionЮридическая и бухгалтерская помощь. Освещаем положение дел по стране в области вакцинации, образования, трудового права, кредитных вопросов и др. Личные консультации тут @uristcentr_msk
Created21 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/urcentr77

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 27% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,8229,9339,877.56 August 2026 — 9,825 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,825 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,826 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,827 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,828 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,822 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,823 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,830 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,823 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,826 subscribers8 September 2026 — 9,831 subscribers12 September 2026 — 9,833 subscribers16 September 2026 — 9,844 subscribers1 October 2026 — 9,849 subscribers8 October 2026 — 9,862 subscribers13 October 2026 — 9,890 subscribers16 October 2026 — 9,904 subscribers23 October 2026 — 9,909 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,911 subscribers29 October 2026 — 9,919 subscribers1 November 2026 — 9,915 subscribers4 November 2026 — 9,933 subscribers6 August 20264 November 2026
22 measurements spanning 90 days, net +108. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,805–9,950 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 06:489,933+18
1 Nov 2026, 15:009,915-4
29 Oct 2026, 13:499,919+8
26 Oct 2026, 07:059,911+2
23 Oct 2026, 09:359,909+5
16 Oct 2026, 21:409,904+14
13 Oct 2026, 22:049,890+28
8 Oct 2026, 07:379,862+13
1 Oct 2026, 10:179,849+5
16 Sept 2026, 07:589,844+11
12 Sept 2026, 16:199,833+2
8 Sept 2026, 19:209,831+5
3 Sept 2026, 16:419,826+3
28 Aug 2026, 18:449,823-7
25 Aug 2026, 15:059,830+7
22 Aug 2026, 18:479,823+1
19 Aug 2026, 04:259,822-6
13 Aug 2026, 01:439,828+1
10 Aug 2026, 04:409,827+1
6 Aug 2026, 20:429,826first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.68%
avg views ÷ 9,933 subscribers
Avg views / post
862
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held50 (25 June 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total10,344
Reactions total771
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 20:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,700
Videos
≈476
Links
≈2,620

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
29m 55s
Average length
4m 59s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,298 reactions across 46 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬58425.4%
❤34715.1%
👍31113.5%
🤯1878.14%
💯1868.09%
🔥1466.35%
😱913.96%
👏753.26%
😁713.09%
😢672.92%
🙏622.70%
💊482.09%
🤡311.35%
🤝241.04%
🥰150.653%
😭140.609%
💩100.435%
👌70.305%
🤔40.174%
🤣40.174%
7 further kinds140.609%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,298 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 49 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @urcentr77. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 50 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 June 2026 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

2 Nov 2026, 19:01 UTC635 views60 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Вот такое закулисье🤷‍♀️

😢29💯25🤝5❤1

2 Nov 2026, 16:10 UTC449 views27 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @imotvetPhoto

Если такое придёт - ничего нажимать нельзя! Это мошенники!

❤20👌7

29 Oct 2026, 19:42 UTC929 views69 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @dumayem

МНОГОДЕТНАЯ СЕМЬЯ 4 ГОДА ЖИВЕТ НА ГЕНЕРАТОРЕ: СОЛНЕЧНОГОРСКИЕ ЧИНОВНИКИ И СИЛОВИКИ САБОТИРУЮТ РЕШЕНИЕ СУДА В мой канал неоднократно обращалась Мария Викторовна Цветкова — многодетная мать из Солнечногорского района Московской области. (Последняя публикация здесь). Ее семья оказалась жертвой откровенного правового нигилизма со стороны коммунальщиков и тотального бездействия местных контролирующих органов. Четыре го…

🤯42😢14🤬10❤2🙏1

27 Oct 2026, 13:46 UTC868 views26 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @imotvetPhoto

Тот самый случай, когда даже не знаешь, кто больший придурок - органы власти, которые не знают федеральных законов, секстантский юризд с акцептами, или верующая в этот сектантский бред заявительница. Настоятельно не рекомендуем обращаться к шарлатанам из всех вариаций сект свидетелей СССР. Их бредни про недействительные паспорта, отзывы акцепта, нахождение вне юрисдикции законов РФ на её территории и прочий индуци…

💯20👍3😨3

27 Oct 2026, 11:43 UTC582 views46 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @semyapravaPhoto

Отмазки неадекватной алтайской чиновницы на скриншотах. Напоминаем - матери, которая никогда не была ограничена или лишена родительских прав не отдают ребёнка. Девочку передали под опеку в другой регион, год скрывали от материи где она, почти 2 года мать судилась, выполняла все тупые и не основанные на законе хотелки алтайских чиновников и даже после решения суда в свою пользу уже полгода не может забрать ребенк…

🤬41😱3👎1💯1

27 Oct 2026, 07:02 UTC602 views51 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @semyapravaPhoto

Ситуация в Новоалтайске по делу Ольги Скворцовой давно вышла за рамки адекватности, но то, что творится сейчас, уже не укладывается в голове. На фото чиновница, которая верховодит этим ювенальным цирком, Швецова Наталья Алексеевна, начальник Отдела охраны прав детства Министерства образования и науки Алтайского края. Телефон: 8(3852)298677 Давайте позвоним ей и спросим, как же так вышло, что 4-летняя дочь Ольги Ск…

🤬46😢4❤1

25 Oct 2026, 09:12 UTC≈1,080 views119 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤66🔥17🥰15😁12👍9

24 Oct 2026, 15:51 UTC978 views75 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁59🔥13👀2😢1

21 Oct 2026, 15:10 UTC≈1,330 views58 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Ну, что поделать, такое время сейчас... В учебниках чушь, которую сложно понять и взрослым, не то что детям третьего класса. А тут и сам учитель не понял условие задачи.

🤡31😱23💯4

21 Oct 2026, 12:56 UTC≈1,300 views74 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Екатерина Мизулина пишет: Интересно, повлияет ли оценка за поведение вот на такие случаи проявления агрессии, как в школе Старого городка? В Старогородковской СОШ восьмиклассник задирал одноклассника, завязалась потасовка. В ходе которой, по словам родителей, обидчик порезал их сына лезвием от канцелярского ножа. Конфликт остановил учитель физкультуры. По словам учеников, нападавший более недели до этого случая хо…

🤬66😢5💯3

20 Oct 2026, 17:49 UTC877 views96 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @semyapravaPhoto

Пример работы Владимирского «антисемейного спецназа» не заставил себя долго ждать - нашелся в местных СМИ в ВК - свежак. https://vk.ru/wall-65541198_51280 Пишут, что детей «выявили во время рейда* по неблагополучным семьям». [*рейд - военн. спланированное стремительное продвижение войск в глубокий тыл противника для выполнения боевых задач - разрушение коммуникаций, захват пленных, диверсии и проч.] На фото всë, …

🤬86😱7🙏3

20 Oct 2026, 06:06 UTC714 views70 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @semyapravaPhoto

Новый мэр Владимира Сергей Волков создал ювенальную межведомственную группу быстрого реагирования и назвал её «семейный спецназ». Очевидно, даже и не понимает, как это звучит, дискредитирует семьи и какие образы вызывает. Впрочем, суть действительно в том, что по любым доносам дуболомы будут с ноги вламываться в семьи и отнимать детей. https://m.vk.ru/wall-191599280_306167 «Во Владимире создали «семейный спецназ» …

🤬43🤯22😱4❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @urcentr77. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@urcentr77 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @urcentr77 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
19 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
19 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Юристы31/Online
@yurist_group31 · 35,767
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
ИММУННЫЙ ОТВЕТ
@imotvet · 60,482
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
ПАРФЕНТЬЕВ.КЛУБ 🇷🇺
@parfentiev_club · 33,835
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
⚠️ Общественный уполномоченный по защите семьи (ОУЗС)
@ouzs_ru · 77,053
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
НОВОСТИ - Родители Москвы
@roditelimoskvynews · 24,993
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
ТЗС (Правозащитное Сообщество Торжества Здравого Смысла)
@victoria_de_communi_sensu · 23,886
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026
Союз родителей «Вместе». Официальный канал.
@rodsoyuz_vmeste · 30,165
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
РВС (Родительское Всероссийское Сопротивление)
@RVSsu · 22,200
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 September 2026
📚О правах детей и родителей📚 Alina_malina_pravo
@malina_pravo · 25,066
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Юрист РФ 77” (@urcentr77), 9,933 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/urcentr77.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.