Ой как стыдно, девоньки! Наши женщины объявили стоимость подарка, за который они готовы великодушно простить «провинившегося» мужчину: - 40% женщин простят за подарок стоимостью от 25 до 50 тысяч рублей - 28% - от 50 до 100 тысяч - 8% - от 500 тысяч и выше Ссорятся в парах постоянно - 74% делают это раз в месяц и чаще. Причём поводы для ссор - самые тупые: - 26% - из-за разбросанных носков - 22% - из-за того, что …

Channel
Стиллавин
@StillavinToday
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
89,169subscribers
-563 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001414052772 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @StillavinToday |
| Description | Ироничный публицист Присоединяйтесь в MAX: max.ru/Stillavin Личное: @RussianMan Канал зарегистрирован |
| Created | 16 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/StillavinToday |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 89,169 | -27 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:26 | 89,196 | -26 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:47 | 89,222 | -12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:39 | 89,234 | -38 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 89,272 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 89,282 | +4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 89,278 | -29 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 89,307 | -25 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 89,332 | -50 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 89,382 | -49 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 89,431 | -17 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 89,448 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 89,452 | -47 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:52 | 89,499 | -14 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 89,513 | -35 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 89,548 | -32 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 89,580 | -19 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 89,599 | -26 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 89,625 | -17 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 89,642 | first reading |
Engagement
51 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 22.2%
- avg views ÷ 89,169 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 19,800
- 40 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.27%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 41
- of 51 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 39 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 51 (29 July 2026 – 4 September 2026) |
| Views total | 791,491 |
| Reactions total | 25,888 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Sept 2026, 04:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈12,100
- Videos
- ≈1,550
- Links
- ≈822
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 28m 06s
- Average length
- 2m 10s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
32,881 reactions across 48 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 14,722 | 44.8% | |
| 👍 | 4,445 | 13.5% | |
| ❤ | 3,749 | 11.4% | |
| 😁 | 2,351 | 7.15% | |
| 🤣 | 1,905 | 5.79% | |
| 🙏 | 1,801 | 5.48% | |
| 🔥 | 1,212 | 3.69% | |
| 🤯 | 710 | 2.16% | |
| 👎 | 400 | 1.22% | |
| 😱 | 239 | 0.727% | |
| 🙈 | 231 | 0.703% | |
| 👏 | 218 | 0.663% | |
| 😭 | 175 | 0.532% | |
| 🍾 | 166 | 0.505% | |
| 🤝 | 145 | 0.441% | |
| 🗿 | 96 | 0.292% | |
| 🍌 | 67 | 0.204% | |
| 🤔 | 67 | 0.204% | |
| 💔 | 57 | 0.173% | |
| 🤪 | 31 | 0.094% | |
| 8 further kinds | 94 | 0.286% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33,556 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 79
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 31
- of 50 we hold a reading for · 62%
- Most on one post
- 16
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @StillavinToday. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 51 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 4 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Учебный год начался со скандала: в столичном районе Коммунарка зафиксированы школьницы-стриптизёрши. Коммунарка - это заМКАДье типа легендарного Бутово. У родителей есть деньги, чтобы купить «девочке» большой айфон, но нет мозгов для воспитания у неё хорошего вкуса и понимания, чем красота отличается от секс-экипировки. Видимо, у мамочки этой «девочки» тоже всё очень плохо с умением различать у сторонних наблюдате…
💯434🤣113🤯64❤26😱18👍12😁8🤝3
Послушал этот высер и тут же явно представил данное существо в лагерном клифту на лесосеке или в убогом сером платочке в швейном цеху. На зоне! Вот мы только вчера отмечали День знаний, а данное видео доказывает: можно выкормить тело до размеров тёлки, но гарантий, что мозг разовьётся пропорционально габаритам черепа, нет совершенно никаких! Допускаю, что наши дуры всё ещё не осознали, как в 2014-ом началась война.…
💯525🤣55👎34❤30🙈14👍9🔥7🤔7
Дорогие друзья! В новом эпизоде нашего совместного с Обществом «Знание» подкаста «Сила слова» мы вспоминаем, как киноязык в XX веке получил своё особое развитие благодаря эксперименту одного новатора. Герой этого выпуска — советский кинорежиссёр, сценарист, теоретик кино и педагог Лев Кулешов. Приятного просмотра!
👍89❤16👎4😁1
Сегодня Геннадию Бачинскому исполнилось бы 55. Двадцать лет назад он сказал в интервью: - Я искренне ненавижу шоу-бизнес. И чем больше я погружаюсь в этот мир, тем больше убеждаюсь, что люди, которые там правят, считают потребителя быдлом, стадом, недостойным того, чтобы проявлять к нему заботу. Гена тяготился тем, что профессия и успех в ней были неразрывно связаны с тем самым шоу-бизнесом. Это неразрешимый парад…
🙏980❤367👏66👍59💔32🔥20👎14⚡5
Сегодня отмечается День свахи. Справка для тех, кто считает, что люди всегда жили так же, как в последние 30-50 лет: свахой была пожилая мудрая женщина, которая знала всю молодёжь в деревне и подбирала пары, элегантно сочетая характеры парня и девки, а также их материальное положение. Нынешнюю ситуацию вы знаете: из ниоткуда возникают люди, которые практически ничего не знают друг о друге; девке кружат голову фанта…
👍323😁163💯66🤪23❤18👎6😎4🍌2
Научное наблюдение сделал Герман Львович: распространение смартфонов вызвало эпидемию разводов. Стерлигов не зря упомянул женщин, ведь 85% заявлений на развод подают именно они. Следовательно, мобильный интернет пагубно влияет как раз на аудиторию, которую некогда именовали «слабым полом». Причина в том, что женщине требуется пресловутая «поддержка», то есть безоговорочное одобрение её взглядов на жизнь, а в интер…
💯440👍73😁51👎24🙈15❤10🗿8😎7
Впервые увидел советский мультик, который вышел на экраны ровно 40 лет назад - и удивился, какой степенью свободы обладали деятели искусства «при тоталитарном режиме»! Посмотрите короткий фрагмент - у многих из вас одновременно появятся смех и опаска! Мол, да как же такое можно говорить?! Но оказывается, можно было - безо всяких оглядок и опасений! И главное, зритель тоже был свободным и готовым воспринимать ирони…
💯438❤57👍51🤣18👎10🔥7😁4🍌1
Я неоднократно бил тревогу: мамулечки наряжают своих маленьких дочек как 30-летних тёлок. Много раз замечал, как матери ведут своих дочек-младшеклассниц, «торжественно» одетых не только в чёрные бабские колготки, но порой и в колготки со стразиками. Всякий раз, когда я поднимал эту тему, прибегали тётки, которые начинали в коментах орать, что «никакого потворства педофилии и провоцирования ненужного мужского вниман…
💯658😱120🙈52❤24🤯18🤣12😁5🤝4
Стиллавин pinned a photo
Сегодня - День отечественного кино. Чтобы понять, почему с ним такая беда у нас, достаточно вспомнить, как возникла эта дата: 27 августа 1919 года советская власть национализировала всю киноиндустрию. Пока кинематограф был под контролем государственной идеологии, на экран выходили шедевры, а как только он перешёл в частные руки, потекла шняга. Глупо отмечать праздник нынешнего коммерческого кино в день, когда этот…
💯664👍129❤62😁25🤝18👎7🍌3👻3
Раскрыта причина инфернальной зависти женщины к лежащему на диване мужчине! Оказывается, даже ничего не делая, мужчина сжигает 1800 ккал в сутки, тогда как женщина - только 1400. Ну, обидно же, когда сама природа против вас! Женщина могла бы худеть интенсивнее, если бы, во-первых, в доме было прохладно (на обогрев тельца калории расходуются интенсивнее), но вы же знаете, как наши бабоньки любят врубать батареи - у…
😁451🤣181👍60💯43❤36👎17🗿11🙊8
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @StillavinToday. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@formansandwomans · 254 postsПростой россиянин
@maklook · 42 postsПрививка Папам 🏍🪝🛠🐭
@antifemvirus · 2181 postCRYPTUCHIN
@cryptuchin · 1691 postКУЛЬТУРНО О ВАЖНОМ
@culturally_important · 2,4971 postОТЦЫ РЯДОМ online
@fathersinharnessrussia · 6121 post«Мудрые мысли» Православный журнал
@hristianskaya_mudrost · 36,6621 postПсихолог | Дмитрий Карягин
@karyagin · 2661 postКит Карасов
@kitkaras · 71 postKombaT159 🇷🇺
@kombat159 · 1151 postКто в Теме 😂👍💪
@ktovteme1001 · 7,8311 post🚹 Men's group | Мужская Группа
@mensgroupe · 111 postМолПолитика
@molpolitika · 121 postОтчуждения повадки
@Otchiujdenia_Povadki · 1551 postПавливМ
@pavlivm · 11,0461 posttalercoxx
@talercoxxx · 2891 postТочка: СМИ и блоги
@tochkasmi · 141 postВЧК-КУЛЬТУРА
@vchkculture · 1291 post🕊 Возрождение 🕊
@vozrozhdenje · 321 postЮРЕВЕРЮ
@yurymilchinsky_official · 7321 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@vestiru · 164,3465 postsTgFM — избранное
@tgfm_favorites · 1223 postsInside 🅉 Donetsk
@Doninside · 24,5992 postsИгорь Коротченко
@igor_korotchenko · 23,4692 postsАлексей Коваленко
@aleksejkovalenkooriginal · 28,3561 postПоддубный |Z|О|V| edition
@epoddubny · 570,9561 postФеминостратегия
@femstrategy · 8,3841 postМакс Рик
@mosrick · 1,5011 postНавуходоносор
@navuhod18 · 81 postРОСАЛИМЕНТЫ. ЦЕНТР СОЦИАЛЬНЫХ ИНИЦИАТИВ
@rosalimenti · 5991 postРОСДНК. ЦЕНТР СОЦИАЛЬНЫХ ИНИЦИАТИВ
@rosdnk · 1131 postСОЛОВЬЁВ
@solovievlive · 1,094,4331 post«Трезвая Россия» Ставропольский край
@trezrussk · 21 postЮлия Витязева
@vityzeva · 48,8511 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@mash · 3,106,184#1
@botcharov · 210,968#2
@bbbreaking · 1,972,028#3
@asupersharij · 1,675,819#4
@temalebedev · 969,276#5
@boris_rozhin · 739,447#6
@solovievlive · 1,094,433#7
@readovkanews · 2,012,162#8
@bazabazon · 1,539,092#9
@auantonov · 321,248#10
@dimsmirnov175 · 323,234#11
@moscowmap · 2,693,986#12
@banksta · 437,258#13
@mig41 · 472,687#14
@imnotbozhena · 504,112#15
@vysokygovorit · 488,817#16
@ejdailyru · 651,803#17
@SergeyKolyasnikov · 444,565#18
@bloodysx · 1,159,246#19
@rvvoenkor · 1,461,333#20
@sashakots · 474,628#21
@rezident_ua · 915,431#22
@zakharprilepin · 225,745#23
@expensive_hurma · 151,673#24
@minaevlife · 318,926#25
@infantmilitario · 277,812#26
@wargonzo · 746,887#27
@savanichi · 194,933#28
@kontext_channel · 828,841#29
@politjoystic · 250,552#30
@legitimniy · 1,053,074#31
@indeec_1937 · 78,149#32
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,612,624#33
@rbc_news · 900,658#34
@realist_realist_realist · 5,858#35
@russicaru · 419,770#36
@bolshiepushki · 325,970#37
@ikakprosto · 327,722#38
@golosmordora1 · 148,940#39
@khazinml · 245,278#40
@proofzzz · 601,184#41
@olegtsarov · 403,670#42
@iikhu · 155,656#43
@aleksandr_skif · 316,534#44
@bponline · 100,639#45
@margaritasimonyan · 514,045#46
@JuliaMenshovaJulia · 360,491#47
@mardanaka · 203,238#48
@insect_life · 191,754#49
@strelets_molodec · 357,328#50
@rkadyrov_95 · 2,160,432#51
@imerkouri · 58,470#52
@tsypkintherealone · 101,001#53
@rlz_the_kraken · 505,804#54
@orda_mordora · 163,972#55
@rozetked · 660,830#56
@moscowach · 4,180,649#57
@mikle1on · 490,275#58
@nikitabsg · 391,400#59
@MedvedevVesti · 183,870#60
@exploitex · 2,030,733#61
@voenkorKotenok · 313,996#62
@mariavladimirovnazakharova · 465,363#63
@dimonundmir · 208,303#64
@bankrollo · 453,588#65
@obrazbuduschego2 · 165,184#66
@oper_goblin · 495,249#67
@yurasumy · 2,670,128#68
@luka_ebkov · 431,616#69
@bomber_fighter · 517,574#70
@medvedev_telegram · 1,706,628#71
@AnatoliyDobin · 13,443#72
@shot_shot · 1,257,609#73
@sladkov_plus · 697,354#74
@yaplakal · 422,265#75
@epoddubny · 570,956#76
@kozakrichala · 180,934#77
@zerada1 · 425,395#78
@dvachannel · 937,447#79
@tass_agency · 567,757#80
@mayak_fm · 13,175#81
@victorstepanych · 156,106#82
@wylsared · 1,070,991#83
@warhistoryalconafter · 482,773#84
@voenacher · 666,436#85
@ASGasparyan · 175,856#86
@mod_russia · 644,783#87
@ukr_2025_ru · 494,017#88
@su2050 · 81,239#89
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@drmyasnikov · 180,193
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
@predsedatelprav · 44,117
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
@psy_annateo · 46,956
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
@lazerzona · 81,872
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
@zr_ru · 73,424
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Стиллавин” (@StillavinToday), 89,169 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StillavinToday.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.