Небополитик, постоянный заместитель директора института Русско-Китайского взаимодействия, воин интернационалист СССР, член союза писателей России.
В вольной редакции.
Чат канала –
https://t.me/+y9c31CA2Vx4yOThi
По всем вопросам –
@SanctiAdmin_bot
Created
28 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +957. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,576–35,961 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 13:00
35,720
-23
16 Sept 2026, 03:57
35,743
-10
14 Sept 2026, 10:19
35,753
-12
12 Sept 2026, 23:41
35,765
-18
11 Sept 2026, 02:42
35,783
-12
8 Sept 2026, 04:39
35,795
+2
4 Sept 2026, 21:56
35,793
-4
3 Sept 2026, 06:18
35,797
-4
2 Sept 2026, 00:35
35,801
+4
1 Sept 2026, 02:48
35,797
+4
31 Aug 2026, 05:42
35,793
+10
30 Aug 2026, 02:04
35,783
+13
29 Aug 2026, 03:23
35,770
+29
28 Aug 2026, 00:43
35,741
+590
26 Aug 2026, 21:48
35,151
+322
25 Aug 2026, 21:22
34,829
-4
24 Aug 2026, 20:04
34,833
+9
23 Aug 2026, 08:34
34,824
+8
21 Aug 2026, 21:57
34,816
-32
20 Aug 2026, 14:19
34,848
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
80.1%
avg views ÷ 35,720 subscribers
Avg views / post
28,600
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 September 2026
Posts held
28 (5 May 2026 – 17 September 2026)
Views total
143,100
Reactions total
2,063
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
19 Sept 2026, 12:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
40
Videos
268
Links
361
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
12,968 reactions across 28 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
3,824
29.5%
🤔
2,733
21.1%
👍
2,658
20.5%
❤
2,570
19.8%
🔥
660
5.09%
🙏
194
1.50%
👏
132
1.02%
🏆
109
0.841%
⚡
88
0.679%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,968 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 28 we hold a reading for · 43%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AndreyDevyatov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 May 2026 to 17 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Забудьте про Бжезинского. Правила игры изменились.
Англосаксонская элита приучила нас мыслить категориями «Великой шахматной доски». Шахматы — это линейная игра: белые ходят, черные отвечают, двоичная система. Но реальная Большая Игра сегодня идет не за шахматной доской, а за Карточным столом истории.
Модель этой игры — «Бридж» (мост в будущее). Здесь физика другая: ходы идут по кругу, ход можно уступить или переда…
Трамп оказался в раскоряку между своей войной в Иране и войной Байдена в Украине. К выборам в конгресс в ноябре Трамп должен подойти с победами, иначе придут демократы и начнутся суды и импичмент.
В Иране Трампу нудно сломит волю к сопротивлению стражей исламской революции - а это не военная и не политическая проблема, но чистая психология.
В Украине Трампу нужно поддержать волю к сопротивлению украинских дюже патр…
Директор ЦРУ привез ультиматум
СВО никак не кончается потому, что объявить победу РФ и исполнение замысла операции можно лишь выйдя на административные границы Донецкой области УССР, а это Краматорск и Славянск, чего пока нет.
Международное влияние РФ (хотябы голосованием в ООН) не нарастает, русофобия в Европе крепчает, Япония наглеет, Китай хитрит.
Внешняя политика Лаврова-Ушакова ныне отметилась отпадением Арме…
Украину разделят.
За этим директор ЦРУ и прилетал в Москву (ведь Пескову не сказали зачем он прилетал).
Как и на каких условиях будут делить Украину (что получат хасиды, что мастера денежных дел, что Путин, что КС, что Трамп) Путин согласует с СИ на саммите ШОС в Бишкек 30.08.26
02.09.26 Путин огласит курс и линию политики РФ на ВЭФ во Владивостоке.
12-13.09 в Дели будет саммит БРИКС. Там Си Цзиньпин и В. Путин б…
Если задаться вопросом: в чем состоит принципиальное отличие «Плана Соломона» (красные) от концептуальной основы доктрин либералов (синие) и патриотов (черные), то ответ будет таким:
Проекты «Вечного царства Израиля» и «Сообщества единой судьбы человечества» китайцев (красные новой эпохи) опираются на закон перемен в связках трех сил в то время, как остальные мировые проекты основаны на библейской догме: «кто не с н…
В шахматах:
Только победа\поражение или ничья.
Победу ВС РФ на поле боя, конечно, объявят.
А вот международного политического признания этой военной победы — не будет.
Результат: военно-политическая ничья.
Если же СВО закончится по Плану Соломона разделом Украины под Новую Хазарию (в исторической Новороссии), то это и будет ничья:
Кремль объявит, что раздел устранил первопричину конфликта (вот и победа).
А хас…
Дефицит бюджета России в январе-июле составил 6,45 трлн руб., сообщила пресс-служба Минфина.
Это верный разведпризнак сворачивания СВО.
Подчеркну: без международного признания (любых) результатов СВО - первопричина конфликта останется не устранённой.
А признание зависит от мировой закулисы (Сынов Завета).
Признание произойдёт как только Украину разделят с выделением Новороссии в (Хасидскую) автономию.
@AndreyDevy…
Стратегическая растерянность в высших коридорах власти РФ: суть завершить боевые действия СВО в Украине (на каких условиях?) или пойти на эскалацию конфликта (до каких пределов и с каким исходом?) происходит от «тумана» войны смыслов новой эпохи.
Не имея концептуальной независимости в Большой Игре за карточным столом истории (намерения сильных мира сего в РФ разнонаправлены), Кремль волей-неволей, то так – то эдак, …
По проявившимся признакам:
- Все негативные тенденции с обстановкой в Крыму будут сняты сразу после завершения СВО.
- СВО завершится новым похабным «Брестским миром» с международным признанием нового статуса всей исторической Новороссии (с ядром уже имеющейся государственности Республики Крым).
- Международное признание результатов СВО (а это раздел Украины) и есть замысел организованного вооруженного насилия на у…
«Тектонические процессы глобальной трансформации», угрозы Третьей мировой войны нового гибридного типа и вызовы новой эпохи информационного общества естественным ходом вещей подвели «Долгое государство Путина» к рубежу передачи власти подросшему поколению преемников постаревшей команды прорабов «суверенной демократии». Наследники проигравшего либерального государства Ельцина этот «дом престарелых» (кому за 70) усердн…
Целью политики может быть поражение в войне оружия, ибо поражение как стратагема гарантирует смену режима власти.
Ведь и Ленин пришел в власти под стратагемой: большевики – пораженцы царской России в мировой войне. Чтобы удержаться у власти ему пришлось пойти и на "похабный Брестский мир".
История повторяется, "возвращаясь на круги своя".
Оргкомитет ПОБЕДА как неформальная вывеска при президенте Путине был создан …
После согласований на Валдае вдали от наблюдателей.
Лидер Союзного государства РФ\РБ Лукашенко прямиком прилетел в Пекин на согласование архитектуры Большой Евразии с "Великим ханом" Сообщества единой судьбы ШОС - Си Цзиньпином.
Прилетел из Минска в Москву на ближнемагистральном, а в Пекин лететь - нужен дальнемагистральный.
Замена самолета - это разведпризнак появления новой срочной темы, и эта тема связана с рол…
💯140🤔126❤74👍48🔥18🙏12👏4🏆3
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @AndreyDevyatov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@AndreyDevyatov edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Андрей Девятов. Небополитика @andrejdevyatov · 25,208 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 September 2026
Перехват управления @logikadysha · 37,230 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
Fikrat Shabanov @Fikrat_Shabanov · 61,133 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
Институт Русской Политической Культуры @fvuchannal · 28,682 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Клуб Улица Правды🇷🇺 @clubpravda · 88,950 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 August 2026
Кямиль Аскерханов - Мнение @KamilAskerkhanov · 23,594 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
Аврора @aurora_network · 30,437 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
Владимир Лепехин | Канал @vladimirlepehin · 46,124 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
Макс атакует! @shevchenkomax_1 · 117,139 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
СВОБОДНОЕ ДЫХАНИЕ -- ☢ЯДрёна WatchЬ‼️ @shingarkin · 23,617 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
ПРОБУЖДЕНИЕ канал @probuzdenie17 · 27,792 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
Старая🗝️книга @oldlibrary · 48,149 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
Дмитрий Перетолчин — «Картина Мира» @ndayclub · 23,459 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
Даниил (Даниэль) Сачков, создатель Бастиона @danielsatchkov · 35,753 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
Алан Мамиев ИНТЕНСИВ @intensiv_Mamiev · 30,496 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 7 September 2026
Говорит Фурсов @govoritfursov · 130,462 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
Алан Мамиев "ЗОВ Предков" @AlanMamiati · 62,399 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
Виктор Ефимов @viktorefimof · 26,443 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 September 2026
Вадим Шегалов. PLANDEMIA.NEWS @voyager1970 · 45,099 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
Телеканал «Сталинград» @TELEKANALSTALINGRAD · 84,551 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
Ольга Четверикова | Официальный канал @ONCHETVERIKOVA · 31,141 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
Каринэ Геворгян. Избранное. @gevorgyankarine · 109,812 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Андрей Девятов” (@AndreyDevyatov), 35,720 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AndreyDevyatov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.