Posted without readable text
❤11custom 54653025565299387047💯6custom 52042835684522910473

Channel
@fitmost
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,194subscribers
+748 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001066391894 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fitmost |
| Created | 15 June 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fitmost |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 15:57 | 15,194 | -513 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 15,707 | +584 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:52 | 15,123 | +112 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:44 | 15,011 | +82 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:06 | 14,929 | +64 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 14,865 | +76 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 14,789 | +181 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 14,608 | +387 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:19 | 14,221 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 14,232 | -18 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 14,250 | -11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 14,261 | -20 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 14,281 | -12 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 14,293 | -7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:36 | 14,300 | -10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 14,310 | -17 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 14,327 | -20 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 14,347 | -34 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 14,381 | -18 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 14,399 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 31 of 32 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (1 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 43,979 |
| Reactions total | 1,405 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,720 reactions across 38 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 448 | 26.0% | |
| custom 5465302556529938704 | 264 | 15.3% | |
| custom 5204283568452291047 | 178 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5235547387019142790 | 166 | 9.65% | |
| custom 5467698650064896718 | 136 | 7.91% | |
| 😁 | 98 | 5.70% | |
| 🔥 | 94 | 5.47% | |
| 😍 | 74 | 4.30% | |
| 💯 | 35 | 2.03% | |
| 😈 | 35 | 2.03% | |
| ✍ | 26 | 1.51% | |
| 👏 | 22 | 1.28% | |
| 🥰 | 20 | 1.16% | |
| 💅 | 18 | 1.05% | |
| 💋 | 18 | 1.05% | |
| custom 5204161544136442909 | 16 | 0.93% | |
| 🏆 | 16 | 0.93% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 0.698% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 0.64% | |
| custom 5465563067771278031 | 9 | 0.523% | |
| 8 further kinds | 24 | 1.40% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,755 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fitmost. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
❤11custom 54653025565299387047💯6custom 52042835684522910473
Если вы тоже еще не дошли до стадии принятия, выпустить пар можно в ⛳️Bumble на м. Полянка
❤34custom 546530255652993870414🏆11😁7✍1
По независящим от нас обстоятельствам лето — всё! За эти три месяца мы каждый день по чуть-чуть, а в итоге успели очень много: 1️⃣ подключили новые места, придумали новые фичи, устроили кучу ивентов и нашли еще больше способов проводить время с вами. На осень планы еще больше! Спасибо, что вы с нами. Продолжаем пробовать разное, находить своё и заботиться о себе так, как хочется именно сегодня 💜 (скачать приложен…
custom 546530255652993870423❤6👍5👏2custom 54655630677712780311
ой у нас же много новеньких на канале 🎃 новички, качайте приложеньюшко и бронируйте блочную (и любые другие занятия) в 1 клик, так удобнее. мы вам рады! 😀
🥰15😁8custom 54653025565299387045
что делаем что делаем что делаем что делаем что делаем что делаеееееем... «блочная» парковка суперметалла воскресенье 06/o9 ★ бронь тут
🔥18😈11custom 52041615441364429098custom 54655630677712780314
Posted without readable text
😍21custom 546769865006489671811✍6❤4🎉2
Posted without readable text
❤26custom 546769865006489671816custom 52355473870191427904💯2
тренировка на шлакоблоках — ждем? это тренировка, которой мы очень горим. Диана из фитмоста реально вкладывает всю душу, чтобы это был лучший день в году для всех любителей пожёстче. будет жесточайшее мощнейшее кардио на парковке суперметалла. драйв и полыхающие огнём ягодицы. по техническим причинам тренировка переносится на 6 сентября: ■ 15:00 — хип-хоп блок ■ 16:00 — драм н бэйс блок кто бронировал на сегодн…
🔥30👏10custom 54653025565299387046custom 52355473870191427905💯3🙏3👍2❤1
Розыгрыш для тех, у кого в планах спорт, движение и приключения! Фитмост × Pisca разыгрывают сразу два приятных повода порадовать себя: 3️⃣ от Фитмоста: сертификат на 10 000 ₽ на спорт, бьюти и массаж в любом из 4000+ мест 3️⃣ от Pisca: сумка подушка браун для формы, кроссовок, ноутбука и всей жизни Условия розыгрыша: — подписаться на @fitmost и @piscawho — н…
❤158custom 546530255652993870477custom 520428356845229104737custom 523554738701914279010👍5🥰4custom 54676986500648967182
Ходят слухи, если подарить любимым учителям и преподавателям сертификат фитмоста — то у них появятся фотки, которые им нельзя выставлять в открытые соцсети. Но этого мы никогда не узнаем…
😁24custom 546530255652993870414🔥7🫡4💅3❤1
У нас в команде одни авантюристы — всегда готовы пробовать что-то новое.☺️ Так классно потеннисить, кстати, можно в ⛳️Партии на м. ЦСКА
❤22custom 52355473870191427907custom 54676986500648967185😁2🏆1💋1😈1custom 54653025565299387041
Иногда самое сложное — не сама тренировка, а выйти на неё (особенно, когда на улице такая кислятина). Но до конца лета мы с BelkaCar не позволим вам идти под зонтом, или толкаться в душном метро! 🔥 ⚠️ Забирайте 1000 рублей на первую поездку с BelkaCar по промокоду FITMOST26! Активируйте промокод перед первой арендой автомобиля и оплачивайте бонусными баллами до 50% от стоимости поездки. Промокод действует до 31 ав…
custom 520428356845229104713🫡4❤3custom 54676986500648967182
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @fitmost. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@fitmost edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Готовы стать героем нашей рубрики о фитмостерах? (напишите в комментариях, если да, чтобы мы с вами связались! 🐰)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“фитмост | спорт и забота о себе” (@fitmost), 15,194 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fitmost.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.