Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 41 days, net +2,689. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,284–6,911 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 06:40
6,492
+783
13 Sept 2026, 10:18
5,709
+103
9 Sept 2026, 13:35
5,606
+1,346
3 Sept 2026, 22:16
4,260
+558
31 Aug 2026, 07:27
3,702
-8
28 Aug 2026, 02:35
3,710
+2
24 Aug 2026, 19:15
3,708
-18
20 Aug 2026, 19:18
3,726
-5
18 Aug 2026, 03:28
3,731
-17
14 Aug 2026, 21:16
3,748
-24
11 Aug 2026, 05:18
3,772
-23
8 Aug 2026, 11:17
3,795
-8
7 Aug 2026, 16:16
3,803
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 45s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
571 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
205
35.9%
🌭
79
13.8%
🔥
68
11.9%
😁
48
8.41%
👾
41
7.18%
❤🔥
33
5.78%
👏
30
5.25%
🤯
14
2.45%
🙈
13
2.28%
🥰
12
2.10%
👍
9
1.58%
🤩
5
0.876%
💔
3
0.525%
✍
2
0.35%
🏆
2
0.35%
🤷♂
2
0.35%
☃
1
0.175%
🐳
1
0.175%
🗿
1
0.175%
😍
1
0.175%
1 further kind
1
0.175%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 571 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Да, до начала учебного года ещё пара-тройка недель, но мы не можем дождаться встречи с вами, поэтому
✨ решили провести ПЕРВЫЙ в истории (для нас) «СОТКА ФЕСТ» ✨
Уже в это воскресенье, 9 августа, в Москве в 16:00 собираются самые продвинутые школьники столицы и Подмосковья — на секретной локации, где будет:
🍕 пицца,
🎁 призы,
🎡 колесо фортуны,
🎵 музыка,
⚽️ футбольчик
и...
⭐секретный звездный гость — Д.....н!⭐
/ пофо…
Тут всё дело в интерференции, происходящей в тонких плёнках
Интерференция — наложение когерентных (согласованных) волн, при котором они могут друг друга усилить или полностью погасить
При попадании на тонкую прозрачную плёнку, белый свет (состоящий из всех цветов радуги) частично отражается [луч 1], частично уходит внутрь. Дойдя до нижней границы луч делает то же самое, отражённый при этом луч выходит в воздух чере…
Как думаете, егэшных знаний хватит, чтобы объяснить появление таких вот цветных плёнок?
🌭 – естественно
👾 – тут без теории относительности не разберёшься
35 реакций на прошлом посте увидел, ждите подкаст😄
В комментах есть правильный ответ!
Это радует
Конденсат на поверхности может появится, если водяной пар в этой области становится пересыщенным – тогда "излишки" переходят в жидкую фазу, это мы и наблюдаем.
С чего вдруг это происходит? Пар находится в уличном воздухе при температуре +27 °С, а потом оказывается у небольшого пятна, на которое направлен холодный воздух в салоне машины (водители часто направляют шторки …
Вау, вот это раритет!
Когда-то давно я начинал работу в нынешнем формате с собственной (с партнёрами) онлайн-школы, и это мерч, предназначавшийся ученикам за успехи в подготовке)
Отыскал в коробке, которая была запечатана в течение 5 лет, улыбнулся, пошёл убираться дальше😄
Всем привет! Стало интересно, можете ли вы понять, что именно мешает вам прямо сейчас при решении задач по физике)
Не понимаю, что от меня хотят: проблема с физикой процесса44%
Путаюсь в формулах или плохо их знаю35%
Неправильно читаю графики/таблицы/схемы23%
Беды с математическими преобразованиями16%
Вроде всё знаю, но не понимаю, с чего начать решение53%
Свой вариант в комментариях🏌️♂️7%
The shares total 178%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @fiz100ege. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Всем привет! Стало интересно, можете ли вы понять, что именно мешает вам прямо сейчас при решении задач по физике)
Не понимаю, что от меня хотят: проблема с физикой процесса44%
Путаюсь в формулах или плохо их знаю35%
Неправильно читаю графики/таблицы/схемы23%
Беды с математическими преобразованиями16%
Вроде всё знаю, но не понимаю, с чего начать решение53%
Свой вариант в комментариях🏌️♂️7%
The shares total 178%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Даша Устинова | Русский ЕГЭ | Сотка @rus100ege · 24,552 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 16 September 2026
Макс Тесла | Физика ЕГЭ 2027 | Умскул @tesla_phys · 31,427 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
Саня Эбонит | Физика ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @sanyaebonit · 81,506 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
Никита Сахаров | Физанутые немного | Физика ЕГЭ 10 класс | Умскул @phsah · 28,209 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 September 2026
Софа Вайб | Информатика ЕГЭ 10 класс 2027 | Байтим и точка | Умскул @sofaavibe · 25,435 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
Азат Адеев | Физика ОГЭ и ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @fizikaoge · 79,898 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Тим Гук | Физика ОГЭ 2027 | Тим и Решалы | Умскул @phys_tim · 53,919 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Максим Кораблев | Физика ОГЭ 2027 | Физика - она везде | Умскул @physicsisanywhere · 53,668 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Нейман | Физика ЕГЭ | Сотка” (@fiz100ege), 6,492 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fiz100ege.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.