В этом канале ботаем ЕГЭ, есть все: теория, практика, эксперименты, новости от ФИПИ и Демидовой!
Работаю 10-ый год, подготовил 120 учеников на 100, 1243 на 90+, 3013 на 80+
Записаться на курс: https://clck.ru/3Q8Ynd
Номер регистрации в РКН: 7822656493
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 67 days, net +560. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,450–32,132 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Oct 2026, 07:59
31,938
+16
9 Oct 2026, 01:18
31,922
+103
4 Oct 2026, 12:17
31,819
+282
26 Sept 2026, 04:58
31,537
+86
19 Sept 2026, 11:37
31,451
+24
17 Sept 2026, 00:57
31,427
+116
15 Sept 2026, 01:39
31,311
+22
13 Sept 2026, 12:15
31,289
+12
11 Sept 2026, 14:56
31,277
+132
8 Sept 2026, 21:38
31,145
+165
5 Sept 2026, 17:42
30,980
+306
3 Sept 2026, 15:38
30,674
+30
2 Sept 2026, 08:18
30,644
-66
1 Sept 2026, 05:25
30,710
-88
31 Aug 2026, 06:07
30,798
-32
30 Aug 2026, 05:28
30,830
-37
29 Aug 2026, 07:43
30,867
-44
28 Aug 2026, 07:25
30,911
-5
27 Aug 2026, 07:15
30,916
-35
26 Aug 2026, 07:03
30,951
first reading
Engagement
324 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 113 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.26%
avg views ÷ 31,938 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,000
147 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
148
of 324 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026
Posts held
324 (3 August 2026 – 13 October 2026)
Views total
294,090
Reactions total
4,769
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Oct 2026, 12:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,370
Videos
≈148
Links
≈2,010
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
16m 33s
Average length
1m 30s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,710 reactions across 322 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,231
48.8%
🔥
857
8.00%
⚡
790
7.38%
😁
659
6.15%
💯
459
4.29%
👏
308
2.88%
❤🔥
270
2.52%
😎
181
1.69%
🎉
175
1.63%
🌚
170
1.59%
🥰
147
1.37%
🤯
141
1.32%
🤩
134
1.25%
🤔
131
1.22%
👍
124
1.16%
😢
111
1.04%
💘
104
0.971%
🫡
87
0.812%
👾
63
0.588%
🗿
60
0.56%
34 further kinds
508
4.74%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 322 of the 324 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,710 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 324 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 13 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Все, физику подшарили! Ну до нее-то 8 месяцев, нормалек, а вот до Итогового сочинения 1,5 месяца... Че делать будете?
Я бы вообще не думал, просто пошел к Сане) Он уже 10 поколений учеников затащил на 5/5! А в этом году он подготовил:
— Файлы с аргументами
— Разборы произведений, пересказы
— Открытый марафон и ролики
— Бот с проверкой ваших работ на ИС
Заходите к Сане прям сейчас, у него открытый веб послезавтра, …
Осторожно, этот №3 может травмировать неподготовленных ЕГЭшников — тут учитывают сопротивление воздуха...
🔥 — ответ 0,4 кг
⚡️ — ответ 0,5 кг
💯 — ответ 0,6 кг
ЕГЭ по ПДД!
Права на машину выдают только тем, кто решает эту задачу №3) Тыкайте реакцию, потом смотрите решение в комментах:
🔥 — ответ 5 м
⚡️ — ответ 10 м
💯 — ответ 20 м
Кто взял наш курс — у того через год будут такие же бланки и баллы! Я проконтролирую)
❗️Кто еще не зашел в подготовку — ребят, начинаю напрягаться, потому что запись закрывается через неделю
У нас тут, конечно, небольшой интернет-апокалипсис, сайт Умскул чинят, рассказывал вчера
Но закидываем вебы-конспекты-ДЗ в закрытый канал курса, ученики ботают, им респект конкретный, вы тоже не отставайте! Жмите:
Во-вторых, моя стобалльная работа ЕГЭ 2026
Пересдаю физику каждый год, держите свежие бланки. Смотрим задачу №26, на рисунке векторные величины, а над ними нет стрелок...
И ничего, 100 баллов) Я 9 раз сдавал ЕГЭ, никогда за это не снижали. Вот вам аргументы, если будет спор с учителем/репетитором!
Во-первых, есть официальный ответ от ФИПИ — за это не снижают!
Это скрин из их методички, полезная штука, там много нюансов, как эксперты ЕГЭ оценивают 2 часть, скачайте себе:
https://fipi.ru/ege/dlya-predmetnyh-komissiy-subektov-rf#!/tab/173729394-3
📊 Вот этот — надо ли ставить стрелочки над векторными величинами на рисунке?
Да65%
Нет35%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤12😁4
Showing the 12 most recent of 324 posts we hold for @tesla_phys. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@tesla_phys edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 September 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 35 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
📊 Если деформацию пружины увеличить в 2 раза, то потенциальная энергия деформации пружины вырастет в 4 раза
Да74%
Нет26%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 324 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 13 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Никита Сахаров | Физанутые немного | Физика ЕГЭ 10 класс | Умскул @phsah · 28,951#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Никита Сахаров | Физанутые немного | Физика ЕГЭ 10 класс | Умскул @phsah · 28,951 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 September 2026
Аделия Адамова | ЕГЭ Профильная математика 2027 | Акулы математики 🦈 @adeliyamath · 64,410 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
Вика Ланская | Информатика ЕГЭ 2027 | ИнфаВикуся | Умскул @infa_vikusya · 45,519 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
Саня Эбонит | Физика ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @sanyaebonit · 84,182 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
Максим Кораблев | Физика ОГЭ 2027 | Физика - она везде | Умскул @physicsisanywhere · 55,951 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Тим Гук | Физика ОГЭ 2027 | Тим и Решалы | Умскул @phys_tim · 56,886 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Артур Шарафиев | Профильная математика ЕГЭ 2027 | Турик Матанит | Умскул @art_matanit · 142,375 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Никита Мешин | Экстремум | Профильная Математика @EXtremumMath · 34,626 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 5 September 2026
Умскул @umschool_official · 135,224 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
Богдан Чагин | Химия ЕГЭ 2027 | Водород к браткам | Умскул @chembogdan · 38,779 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
Азат Адеев | Физика ОГЭ и ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @fizikaoge · 86,490 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Профиматика | ЕГЭ по Математике | Игорь Уколов и Влад Вуль @profimatika · 44,527 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
Евгений Тьюринг | ЕГЭ 10 класс Профильная математика 2026 | Гении математики | Умскул @geniusesofmath · 33,839 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
Дима Купер | Информатика ОГЭ 2027 | Эксперт на связи | Умскул @DimaCooperr · 43,042 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
Софа Вайб | Информатика ЕГЭ 10 класс 2027 | Байтим и точка | Умскул @sofaavibe · 26,111 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
Математик МГУ | Подготовка к ЕГЭ @mathmsu · 22,266 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 September 2026
Мария Вельф | В гостях у русички | Русский ЕГЭ 10 класс | Умскул @welf_rus · 71,093 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
Артём Фролов | Информатика ОГЭ 2027 | Двоичный кот | Умскул @twocod · 127,493 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
Александр Долгих | Русский ЕГЭ 2027 | Грамотным быть модно | Умскул @dolgih_umrus · 180,791 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Макс Тесла | Физика ЕГЭ 2027 | Умскул” (@tesla_phys), 31,938 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tesla_phys.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.