Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Физика с Планк | ЕГЭ 2027 | Вебиум

Channel

Физика с Планк | ЕГЭ 2027 | Вебиум

@planck_ege

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,455subscribers

-48 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001673057450
TypeChannel
Username@planck_ege
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/planck_ege

Growth

9,3599,5039,4317 August 2026 — 9,503 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,493 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,441 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,450 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,384 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,450 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,393 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,388 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,380 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,359 subscribers8 September 2026 — 9,455 subscribers9,4557 August 20268 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 32 days, net -48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,337–9,525 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 04:219,455+96
2 Sept 2026, 21:099,359-21
30 Aug 2026, 13:539,380-8
27 Aug 2026, 19:439,388-5
25 Aug 2026, 02:179,393-57
21 Aug 2026, 09:429,450+66
18 Aug 2026, 02:039,384-66
14 Aug 2026, 17:349,450+9
11 Aug 2026, 02:139,441-52
8 Aug 2026, 01:489,493-10
7 Aug 2026, 12:469,503first reading

Engagement

64 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.51%
avg views ÷ 9,455 subscribers
Avg views / post
804
46 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
46
of 64 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 44 of 46 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held64 (3 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total37,003
Reactions total550
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

885 reactions across 59 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
58265.8%
💔16018.1%
😁414.63%
🔥283.16%
💯273.05%
💋121.36%
🤯91.02%
🍌70.791%
💘60.678%
😭50.565%
custom 527390064610850721140.452%
👻20.226%
👍10.113%
💅10.113%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 885 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC484 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Весь состав демки мы обсудили до выхода демки😂 Ну, потому что наша Марина Юрьевна уже на сьездк учителей физики все проговаривала! Но общему ажиотажу ожидания демки хотелось тоже поддаться!

9

28 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC546 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

Дроп от Демидовой!!! Канал Снежи Планк

6

28 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC774 views13 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Девочки, все сюда, Валя, Аннушка!!! (Это мое настроение на выход демки)

😁93💯1

27 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC847 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

По моему опыту каждый год половина 11-классников обещают себе начать готовиться летом, чтобы было больше времени, но так ни разу и даже не открывают Демидову Конечно, лучше начать летом, но начать с сентября — тоже нормально. Летом хочется насладиться временем, когда нет ни экзаменов, ни поступления, ни переживаний. Я тотально поддерживаю качественный отдых, но у многих он затягивается... Эти ребята успокаивают себ

4

27 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC693 views77 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Друзья, плохие новости... Через неделю начинается учёба. Честно рассказываем, готовились к ЕГЭ летом? ❤️ — я стартанул/а уже! 💔 — нееет 😭

41💔33😭3

26 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC785 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Мы на курсе опираемся исключительно на актуальные материалы! ✨все уроки и теоретические материалы составляются на основе учебников федерального перечня и документов ФИПИ; ✨все домашки собираются из сборников и заданий с реального егэ прошлых лет; ✨наставники проходят экспертное обучение и переобучение, чтобы проверять домашки в соответствии с актуальными критериями; ✨все темы берутся из кодификатора: мы пройдем всё,

3💋3

26 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC728 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Но всё это не просто набор слов, а важные документы, которые устанавливают формат экзаменационного КИМа на ЕГЭ! Разберёмся с каждым отдельно: 🫲Кодификатор — документ, содержащий все формулы и темы, которые встретятся на экзамене! Он удобно поделен на пункты разделов и подтем 🫲Спецификация — документ, с помощью которого можем узнать разбалловку и темы, которые могут встретиться в каждом номере 🫲Демоверсия — вариан

6

26 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC820 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

❗️Получается, пока расслабляемся? Ну нам, физикам, особо переживать и не надо было, мы предварительно без изменений Но может мы с вами пока изучим, что в целом нам выкатят ФИПИ 28 аагуста? Если вы только начинаете подготовки, то демка, спецификация, кодификатор…могут вам казаться набором слов просто

10

25 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC959 views13 reactionsread 29 August 2026

А демка-то здесь

🔥64💋2👻1

25 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC998 views18 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

В ожидании демки…

17👻1

24 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC≈1,160 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

‼️ Изменения в ЕГЭ по физике не планируются Мы всё ещё ждём демоверсию, чтобы узнать, каким будет ЕГЭ по физике 2027 Даже, если в структуре экзамена нет изменений, после демоверсии мы сможем сделать вывод о распределении тем в заданиях экзамена. Каждый год на физике можно примерно понять, как будет выглядеть КИМ! Разбирать демо буду здесь, залетайте в бота, чтобы не пропустить: https://t.me/webium_school_bot?start

10💘2

Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @planck_ege. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTCAnonymous Quiz184 voters

В инерциальной системе отсчёта для поддержания равноускоренного прямолинейного движения тела необходимо прикладывать к нему постоянную силу

  1. Верно77%
  2. Неверно23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTCAnonymous Quiz182 voters

Сила трения скольжения  — сила гравитационной природы

  1. Верно37%
  2. Неверно63%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTCAnonymous Quiz193 voters

Одна и та же сила сообщает телу меньшей массы большее ускорение

  1. Верно86%
  2. Неверно14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTCAnonymous Quiz194 voters

Силы, с которыми тела действуют друг на друга, лежат на одной прямой, направлены в противоположные стороны, равны по модулю, имеют разную природу

  1. Верно34%
  2. Неверно66%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTCAnonymous Quiz212 voters

Сила тяжести и сила упругости являются консервативными силами

  1. Верно67%
  2. Неверно33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Макс Тесла | Физика ЕГЭ 2027 | Умскул
@tesla_phys · 31,145
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
Саня Эбонит | Физика ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор
@sanyaebonit · 79,269
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
Макс Кораблев | Физика ОГЭ 2027 | Физика - она везде | Умскул
@physicsisanywhere · 52,980
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Азат Адеев | Физика ОГЭ и ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор
@fizikaoge · 77,176
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Тим и Решалы | Физика ОГЭ | Тим Гук и правило рук ✋ | Умскул
@phys_tim · 52,354
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Никита Мешин | Экстремум | Профильная Математика
@EXtremumMath · 32,855
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 5 September 2026
English from London
@thegap_club · 35,202
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
Аделия Адамова | ЕГЭ Профильная математика 2027 | Акулы математики 🦈
@adeliyamath · 67,677
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Физика с Планк | ЕГЭ 2027 | Вебиум” (@planck_ege), 9,455 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/planck_ege.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.