Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Грани личного бренда

Channel

Грани личного бренда

@forumbrand

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,818subscribers

-34 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001768272122
TypeChannel
Username@forumbrand
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/forumbrand

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,8183,8523,8357 August 2026 — 3,852 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,852 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,851 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,849 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,847 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,841 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,842 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,836 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,834 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,825 subscribers12 September 2026 — 3,822 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,818 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 40 days, net -34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,813–3,857 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 21:593,818-4
12 Sept 2026, 07:563,822-3
2 Sept 2026, 19:263,825-9
30 Aug 2026, 09:473,834-2
26 Aug 2026, 23:573,836-6
24 Aug 2026, 04:483,842+1
20 Aug 2026, 22:543,841-6
17 Aug 2026, 15:553,847-2
14 Aug 2026, 16:133,849-2
7 Aug 2026, 19:043,851-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:313,852no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:273,852first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 7 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

72 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2940.3%
❤‍🔥2027.8%
👍912.5%
811.1%
34.17%
👏34.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 11:01 UTC233 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

БЕСПЛАТНОГО СОБЫТИЯ НЕ СУЩЕСТВУЕТ Вход может быть бесплатным для участника. Площадку, спикеров, питание и продвижение всё равно кто-то оплачивает. Раньше крупная компания покупала место внутри чужого форума: стенд, доклад, логотип. Теперь бренд всё чаще строит целый день сам и делает вход бесплатным. Алексей Бердышев, продюсер форума «Грани личного бренда», оценил масштаб этого слоя: по его рабочей оценке, в 2025

🔥4❤‍🔥2👍1👏1

29 May 2026, 12:25 UTC464 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Иногда проект растёт быстрее, чем компетенции человека, который его собирает. Так было с первым большим форумом в Новосибирске. Снаружи всё выглядело уверенно: Собчак, Лисовец, Утяшева, сильные предприниматели в программе, площадка, городская реклама, бюджет, обязательства. А внутри в какой-то момент стало ясно: главный канал привлечения аудитории требует совсем другого уровня понимания. Продюсер форума «Грани ли

❤‍🔥4🔥3👍2

27 May 2026, 06:09 UTC363 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Одна из самых частых ошибок личного бренда Когда люди начинают думать о личном бренде, они почти сразу приходят к вопросу тем. О чём писать, какие темы выбирать, какую экспертизу показывать. Но эта логика часто приводит к странному результату. Контент появляется, а личность в нём почти не ощущается. Получается аккуратная лента публикаций, в которой есть информация, рекомендации и наблюдения. Всё выглядит корректно

🔥5❤‍🔥43👍1

26 May 2026, 06:37 UTC325 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ИИ может участвовать в создании результата. Но отвечать за него всё равно будет человек. Глава Роспатента Юрий Зубов в интервью «Эксперту» объяснил важную вещь: искусственный интеллект не может быть правообладателем интеллектуальной собственности. Им может быть только человек или компания. При этом использование ИИ не мешает получить патент, если разработка соответствует критериям патентоспособности. Для предприним

👍3🔥21

19 May 2026, 11:58 UTC398 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему экспертность сама по себе больше не создаёт личный бренд Ещё десять–пятнадцать лет назад экспертность почти автоматически превращалась в личный бренд. Если человек обладал редкими знаниями, писал статьи или выступал на профессиональных мероприятиях, его имя постепенно становилось заметным в отрасли. Сегодня ситуация изменилась. Экспертных знаний стало гораздо больше, чем публичного внимания. Интернет сделал

🔥93❤‍🔥3👏2

13 May 2026, 07:03 UTC363 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В большом проекте иногда дорого стоит одно решение, которое со стороны почти не видно. Продюсер форума «Грани личного бренда» Алексей Бердышев написал у себя в канале про пустой стул в первом ряду. Про дорогой билет, известного гостя и ситуацию, в которой легко ошибиться, если очень хочется видеть в зале сильных людей. Этот текст поймут предприниматели, организаторы и спикеры. Каждый — со своей стороны: https://t.

3🔥3❤‍🔥1

7 May 2026, 07:33 UTC446 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Грани» продолжаются после последнего выступления. Самые точные отзывы о «Гранях» часто приходят не в первый вечер. В первый вечер участники ещё внутри события: снимают спикеров, выкладывают фрагменты, пишут короткое «сильно», «классно», «мурашки». Это живые первые реакции. Но содержательные сообщения обычно приходят позже. Через несколько дней. Через неделю. Иногда через месяц. В них уже меньше первого впечат

❤‍🔥6🔥3👍21

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @forumbrand. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Хакаматон — программы Ирины Хакамада 🈺
@hakamatonproject · 31,034
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
Король Говорит! Ораторское
@korolgovorit_school · 23,842
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 September 2026
Бизнес-клуб «Атланты»
@bc_atlanty · 31,376
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026
Радислав Гандапас
@radislavgandapascom · 53,031
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Нина Зверева: Семья и Школа
@ninazvereva · 31,790
Telegram ranks this channel #95 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 5 September 2026
X10 Движение
@X10_Movement · 42,088
Telegram ranks this channel #96 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Грани личного бренда” (@forumbrand), 3,818 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/forumbrand.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.