27 measurements spanning 28 days, net -279. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,468–22,883 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 08:20
22,516
-17
2 Sept 2026, 18:19
22,533
-9
1 Sept 2026, 18:24
22,542
-21
31 Aug 2026, 17:35
22,563
-7
30 Aug 2026, 20:14
22,570
-20
29 Aug 2026, 19:13
22,590
-10
28 Aug 2026, 19:59
22,600
-10
27 Aug 2026, 21:18
22,610
-21
26 Aug 2026, 19:15
22,631
-37
25 Aug 2026, 18:11
22,668
-28
24 Aug 2026, 17:06
22,696
-19
22 Aug 2026, 23:07
22,715
-26
21 Aug 2026, 10:34
22,741
-8
20 Aug 2026, 10:28
22,749
-19
19 Aug 2026, 09:05
22,768
-4
18 Aug 2026, 12:26
22,772
-13
17 Aug 2026, 12:35
22,785
-18
16 Aug 2026, 03:54
22,803
-16
14 Aug 2026, 12:07
22,819
-8
13 Aug 2026, 05:09
22,827
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.4%
avg views ÷ 22,516 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,390
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
24 (4 June 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
25,560
Reactions total
1,035
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 12:11 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
9,009 reactions across 24 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,978
44.2%
🔥
1,148
12.7%
❤🔥
1,010
11.2%
👍
471
5.23%
😁
467
5.18%
🌚
339
3.76%
🍌
291
3.23%
👎
268
2.97%
🤯
180
2.00%
💯
134
1.49%
🤔
124
1.38%
💊
117
1.30%
🤨
114
1.27%
🤝
67
0.744%
👾
62
0.688%
🍾
57
0.633%
🥰
36
0.4%
✍
28
0.311%
🤷♂
28
0.311%
🏆
18
0.2%
7 further kinds
72
0.799%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,009 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
134
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 24 we hold a reading for · 83%
Most on one post
21
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @freshspark. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 June 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Учебу я не слишком любил, и уже в младших классах выкупил что меня пытаются заставить работать за фейковую валюту - оценки.
Но само по себе 1 сентября, мне на самом деле всегда латентно нравилось.
Еще стоит теплая погода, встречаешь своих друганов, ненависть к недругам за лето успела подвыветриться. Грудь у девочек снова стала больше. Начинается новый жизненный этап емае, в этом учебном году все будет по-другому, во…
Так вот, во время активации шарингана, заметил, что помимо мыслей в голове также иногда всплывают недорисованные образы, обрывки фраз, голоса и лица людей, которых я даже не особо то и хотел запоминать.
Это натолкнуло меня на рассуждение от творчестве, контенте, который я несколько обесценил для себя в последнее время.
Ведь точно также, где-то там, в вашей голове живет и обрывок меня. В какой-то области вашего мозг…
В последнее время несколько увлекся медитацией. Знаю-знаю, от этого слова веет всякой йогой, духовностью и просветленной душнотой.
Я сам пробовал несколько раз на протяжении своих 39 лет и каждый раз не мог уловить что такого в этом находят.
По сути, это управление вниманием с целью наблюдения мыслей или отдыха от них. На деле - практически шаринган.
Чтобы научиться его использовать и почувствовать эффект, во перв…
Да че вам сказать, пупсы
Торчу я тут, в Таиландах, все жду окончания движухи. Жаловаться особо не на что, тут здорово, мне нравится все это, и свои люди тут встречаются, завтра вот иду на свидание с какой-то симпатишной белоруской.
Но все таки я не дома. Некоторые меня не понимают, мол че тебе этот дом, какая разница, тут все лучше, живи и радуйся. А не хочу я. Я и так пол жизни болтался непонятно где и был постоян…
В связи с активным газом, нам категорически нужны
• Разработчик для ios и android (способный как собрать с нуля, так и дорабатывать имеющийся код)
• Монтажер рекламных материалов (вертикальные видео по референсу)
• Дизайнер приложений
• Маркетолог (способный и запускать кампании и предлагать стратегические решения)
Буду обновлять страницу и ждать ваших предложений/портфолио на почте:
[email protected]
Я конечно слегка в шоке с того как все стремительно развивается со Степом. Вообще, за что бы я не брался, все всегда оказывалось сложнее и проблематичнее, чем хотелось бы. Я уже и привык к тому что не получится не то что с первого раза, хорошо если получится с 5-го или 10-го.
Но со Степом было все наоборот, вроде только вчера запускали экспериментальный тг бот в рамках канала, тип пойдет/не пойдет, а сегодня это уже…
Ровно 30 дней подряд выкладываю суда посты.
В целом, было забавно, актив вырос, мне в личку стали чаще писать всякие шизы и норм челики, продал даже пару консультаций по ютубу, хоть и не слишком люблю это делать.
В остальном, пусть я и делал это в большей части для себя, затея это довольно бесперспективная. В телеграме нет нормальной системы рекомендаций, неважно насколько интересный пост ты напишешь - увидят его т…
Наткнулся старую заметку.
Как-то так все и началос
👍254❤69🔥34❤🔥8🍌6🏆6👾2🤝2
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @freshspark. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ЧД @che_d_e · 37,725 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
Альберт @robiyolo · 48,572 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Свежий” (@freshspark), 22,516 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/freshspark.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.