Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 4 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @TartariaIBERICA. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
59 measurements spanning 93 days, net -335. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,505–12,944 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 07:06
12,556
-3
6 Nov 2026, 07:25
12,559
+1
5 Nov 2026, 05:25
12,558
-6
4 Nov 2026, 08:18
12,564
-2
3 Nov 2026, 10:45
12,566
-2
2 Nov 2026, 09:40
12,568
-4
1 Nov 2026, 06:46
12,572
-6
31 Oct 2026, 03:59
12,578
-5
30 Oct 2026, 06:10
12,583
-9
29 Oct 2026, 09:14
12,592
-6
28 Oct 2026, 08:58
12,598
-3
26 Oct 2026, 13:56
12,601
-7
25 Oct 2026, 12:06
12,608
-6
24 Oct 2026, 12:41
12,614
-1
23 Oct 2026, 09:30
12,615
+4
22 Oct 2026, 12:46
12,611
-9
21 Oct 2026, 07:35
12,620
-1
20 Oct 2026, 06:51
12,621
-9
18 Oct 2026, 06:18
12,630
-2
17 Oct 2026, 07:08
12,632
first reading
Engagement
172 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.03%
avg views ÷ 12,556 subscribers
Avg views / post
255
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.728%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 172 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 36 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
172 (4 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
9,175
Reactions total
30
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 19:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,480
Videos
≈2,180
Links
≈3,470
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5h 07m
Average length
2m 31s
Measured directly from 122 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
365 reactions across 124 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
219
60.0%
👍
39
10.7%
👏
32
8.77%
💯
31
8.49%
🕊
16
4.38%
🔥
9
2.47%
❤🔥
5
1.37%
😍
4
1.10%
🙏
3
0.822%
😁
2
0.548%
🤔
2
0.548%
🥰
2
0.548%
👌
1
0.274%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 124 of the 172 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 365 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 172 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 36 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
💥 UN PICCOLO PASSO PER UN UOMO, UN GRANDE INGANNO PER L’UMANITÀ
🗓 domenica 8 novembre 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟨
🕛 𝘖𝘳𝘦 21:𝟢𝟢
🎤 𝘈𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘶𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦: Pasquale De Santis
🎙️ 𝘖𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘦: William Vaccaro
📺 𝘐𝘯 𝘥𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘢 𝘴𝘶𝘭 𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘠𝘰𝘶𝘛𝘶𝘣𝘦 Oltre la Tempesta - Crime & Cold Case
Ospite d'eccezione William Vaccaro (canale Telegram Beyond Tartaria, il risveglio dalla MATRIX GeoStorica) ai microfoni di Pasquale De Santis per una fucilata senza filtri che demo…
💥400.000 KM SENZA SEGNALE: IL DELIRIO SPAZIALE DELLA TELEFONATA DI NIXON
La narrazione ufficiale è piena di favole così grossolane che oggi, a distanza di decenni, fanno sorridere chiunque abbia un minimo di senso logico. Ci raccontano che nel 1969 il presidente Richard Nixon, comodamente seduto alla sua scrivania nello Studio Ovale con un telefono a disco e un centralino dell'epoca, potesse fare una normale telefon…
Nel tempio eterno e immutabile del Sé, dove la materia non è che un sogno passeggero dell'illusione, non piegare mai il divino respiro alle lusinghe di un'ombra o al fragore effimero del mondo materiale.
Ascolta il silenzio del Divino che pulsa nel profondo del cuore, scegliendo sempre la via luminosa dello Spirito al di là di ogni simulazione, poiché solo arrendendosi alla fiamma immortale dell'Assoluto si spezza …
🌸 GEMATRIA — ALLA SCOPERTA DELL'ANIMA - OLTRE LA MATRICE GEOSTORICA
Un viaggio oltre il tempo, tra Terre Sacre, memorie, codici numerici e la grande dissimulazione geostorica.
Ci sono viaggi che non iniziano mai quando facciamo i bagagli.
Iniziano molto prima, nel gremito silenzio di una domanda che ci abita da sempre. In quella sensazione sottile, inspiegabile e bruciante di riconoscere qualcosa che la nostra …
UTOPIA (2013): LA SERIE PROFETICA CHE HA SMASCHERATO IL PIANO DI DEPOLOLAZIONE PRIMA DEL TEMPO
La narrazione ufficiale ci ripete che certe trame apocalittiche siano solo il frutto della fantasia di sceneggiatori geniali, casuali coincidenze nate per intrattenere le masse. È l'ennesimo inganno dei custodi della simulazione, smentito da ciò che la cinematografia d'élite compie sistematicamente attraverso la cinematogr…
Anatomia del Narcisismo: La Maschera dell'Invulnerabilità e il Vuoto Fondamentale
Nel panorama della psicologia contemporanea, il narcisismo viene spesso banalizzato come sinonimo di vanità o eccessivo amore per se stessi.
Tuttavia, un'indagine clinica e psicodinamica rigorosa rivela una realtà diametralmente opposta: il narcisista non si ama affatto; al contrario, è prigioniero di una struttura di personalità edif…
IL GRANDE TEATRO DELLO SPAZIO: CARTAPESTA, EFFETTI SPECIALI E LA MESSINSCENA DEGLI ANNI '60
La narrazione ufficialeH✡️ continua a venderci la favola della presunta "conquista dello spazio" come il più grande trionfo tecnologico dell'umanità. Ma la realtà dei fatti, quando si ha il coraggio di guardare oltre il velo della propaganda, svela una verità grottesca: le presunte missioni storiche, sia quelle sovietiche com…
🌸 LA MEMORIA DEL TEMPO: Oltre il Velo per Liberare il Presente
Se impariamo a sollevare il pesante sipario del tempo lineare, ci accorgiamo che la nostra esistenza non è un punto d'origine isolato, ma l'eco magnifico, complesso e stratificato di innumerevoli capitoli scritti in altre dimensioni, in altri cicli, in altri mondi.
Abbeverandoci alla sorgente della sapienza orientale, scopriamo una verità immensa: og…
La Chasse sauvage, les cavaliers que personne ne voulait croiser
Entendre des chevaux au-dessus de sa maison, en pleine nuit… Dans les légendes norvégiennes, ce fracas annonçait parfois l’arrivée d’une troupe de morts et d’esprits lancés à travers le ciel. On redoutait particulièrement leur passage autour de Noël. Celui qui se trouvait sur leur route pouvait être emporté dans les airs, puis abandonné très loin de ch…
Deux hommes des bois dans la généalogie royale portugaise
Couronnés de feuillage, armés de massues et couverts de peaux de bêtes, deux hommes velus encadrent les armoiries royales du Portugal. L’un porte une peau de lion, l’autre une peau de léopard. Leurs longues barbes grises, leurs boucliers et leurs imposantes silhouettes leur donnent l’allure de gardiens d’un autre âge.
Cette magnifique enluminure ouvre la Géné…
La Cité d’airain, le royaume où plus personne ne répond
Dans les Mille et Une Nuits, une expédition partie à la recherche des vases où Salomon aurait enfermé des génies découvre une cité aux murailles infranchissables. Ceux qui grimpent pour observer l’intérieur paraissent soudain fascinés, puis se jettent de l’autre côté. Que voient-ils donc derrière ces remparts ? La ville semble attirer les vivants vers un secret…
PREDICTIVE CINEMATOGRAPHY: "PRECRIME" AND PREVENTIVE CONTROL IN MINORITY REPORT
Official geohistory presents Hollywood cinema as mere "entertainment." This is yet another deception of the simulation: major productions do not invent anything—they program reality. Through the technique of predictive cinematography, the guardians of the Matrix reveal their plans in advance, conditioning the collective perception to a…
😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 172 posts we hold for @galliactica. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @galliactica as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
12 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
31 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Question Everything @thedoctorregenerated · 32,776 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GALLIACTICA 💥 la vérité est ailleurs” (@galliactica), 12,556 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/galliactica.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
