Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 4 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (4 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 40 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @TartariaIBERICA. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
42 measurements spanning 92 days, net +213. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 42
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 22:51
13,381
+1
4 Nov 2026, 23:58
13,380
-10
3 Nov 2026, 22:58
13,390
+2
3 Nov 2026, 06:22
13,388
+13,377
29 Oct 2026, 12:10
11
+5
22 Oct 2026, 10:27
6
+5
15 Oct 2026, 20:37
1
-13,406
14 Oct 2026, 20:05
13,407
-8
13 Oct 2026, 13:07
13,415
-33
9 Oct 2026, 15:37
13,448
-44
5 Oct 2026, 05:21
13,492
-17
28 Sept 2026, 13:37
13,509
+137
17 Sept 2026, 22:16
13,372
-3
15 Sept 2026, 21:41
13,375
+3
14 Sept 2026, 05:40
13,372
-8
12 Sept 2026, 10:17
13,380
+3
10 Sept 2026, 07:40
13,377
-14
7 Sept 2026, 05:14
13,391
+2
4 Sept 2026, 12:19
13,389
+7
2 Sept 2026, 21:58
13,382
first reading
Engagement
430 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.08%
avg views ÷ 13,381 subscribers
Avg views / post
412
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 430 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 39 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
430 (5 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
16,468
Reactions total
405
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 18:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 12m
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 147 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,242 reactions across 406 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,288
30.4%
👏
404
9.52%
😎
329
7.76%
🙏
316
7.45%
🤩
289
6.81%
😍
264
6.22%
🔥
230
5.42%
🏆
197
4.64%
⚡
145
3.42%
🍾
137
3.23%
🥰
124
2.92%
👍
123
2.90%
🕊
107
2.52%
👀
81
1.91%
❤🔥
74
1.74%
💯
37
0.872%
🤔
28
0.66%
👨💻
17
0.401%
🙈
11
0.259%
🤗
9
0.212%
14 further kinds
32
0.754%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 424 of the 430 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,391 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 430 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 41 posts held from the last 30 days (7.32%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Se guardiamo oltre il velo del tempo lineare, la nostra esistenza attuale non è un punto d'origine, ma l'eco magnifico e complesso di innumerevoli capitoli scritti in altre dimensioni, in altri cicli, in altri mondi.
Seguendo gli insegnamenti della scienza orientali, ogni essere umano porta in sé una memoria multidimensionale vasta quanto l'universo:
centinaia, talvolta migliaia di frammenti di coscienza vissuti lun…
L'influenza della frequenza fondamentale della risonanza di Schumann (7,83 Hz) sulla ghiandola pineale
Sotto l'influenza della frequenza fondamentale della risonanza di Schumann (7,83 Hz), la ghiandola pineale produce l'ormone melatonina.
La melatonina è l'ormone principale dell'epifisi, un regolatore dei ritmi circadiani. Aumenta l'efficienza del sistema immunitario e rallenta i processi di invecchiamento. Con l'et…
Antichi manufatti sotterranei e megalitici: risonatori delle onde di Schumann
La NASA e l'Istituto Max Planck hanno stabilito che le onde di Schumann sono essenziali per la sopravvivenza di tutti gli esseri viventi sulla Terra. Sotto l'influenza della frequenza di 7,83 Hz, la ghiandola pineale produce melatonina. Nel 1995, W. Piejoli e W. Regelson hanno dimostrato che "la dose giornaliera di melatonina... inverte i …
Segreti nascosti nelle antiche cattedrali e la fisica moderna
La risonanza di Schumann è un'onda elettromagnetica stazionaria che si forma tra la Terra e l'ionosfera, con una frequenza principale di 7,83 Hz, definita "il respiro della Terra". I dispositivi moderni che riproducono questa frequenza promettono di neutralizzare le radiazioni elettromagnetiche dannose e migliorare il benessere umano. L'autore confronta i…
I maghi hanno un segreto: sanno che l'energia segue l'attenzione. Ciò su cui ci concentriamo, si espande. Quindi, oggi accendiamo il faro nei sogni nei desideri....
✨✨✨🙏✨✨✨
https://t.me/IOsonoANIMA11
Vorrei una donna che si emozioni come i tramonti
e si prenda cura del mondo come la rugiada.
(Fabrizio Caramagna)
Buona notte anime belle❤️
✨✨✨🙏✨✨✨
https://t.me/IOsonoANIMA11
QFS — LA VERITÀ CHE RESTITUISCE L'UOMO A SE STESSO
Forse il vero QFS non è ciò che il mondo aspetta che arrivi, ma ciò che l'umanità deve finalmente ricordare.
Non esiste sistema finanziario capace di rendere libero un essere umano che non riconosce ancora il proprio valore. Nessuna ricchezza può comprare la sovranità di una coscienza, nessun fondo segreto può restituire ciò che abbiamo consegnato alla paura, nessu…
8. La nascita della sovranità collettiva
La sovranità individuale non significa vivere isolati.
Al contrario.
Soltanto quando due persone non hanno bisogno di possedersi possono incontrarsi liberamente.
Una famiglia non deve essere una prigione.
Una relazione non deve essere una proprietà.
Una comunità non deve essere una setta.
Una guida non deve diventare un padrone.
Una fede non deve cancellare il pensiero…
4. Il precursore: colui che apre la porta
Ogni cambiamento nella storia comincia quando qualcuno mette in discussione ciò che tutti considerano immutabile.
Il precursore è colui che si avvicina alla porta prima che gli altri ne riconoscano l'esistenza.
Ma c'è una differenza fondamentale tra aprire una porta e diventare il proprietario della strada.
Il vero precursore non pretende seguaci. Non costruisce una gerar…
PRE-RESET
Il precursore, il Santo Graal e la nascita della coscienza sovrana
C'è una domanda che attraversa tutta la storia dell'umanità: da dove ricomincia l'essere umano quando comprende di aver vissuto dentro una realtà che non ha scelto?
Forse la risposta non è tornare indietro. Forse è tornare a zero.
Non allo zero come assenza, ma allo zero come spazio originario. Quello spazio che precede ogni definizione,…
❤4👏4🍾1🏆1💯1🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 430 posts we hold for @IOsonoANIMA11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🏛 Beyond Tartaria: Risveglio dalla Matrix Geo-Storica @TARTARIAITALIACHANNEL · 23,789 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 17 September 2026
Codice Genesi @httpR2aVkMTA0 · 29,591 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 8 September 2026
Awake432Hz C.C. @Awake432hz · 39,737 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 31 August 2026
TARTARIA the truth @TARTARIAthetruth · 39,891 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 30 August 2026
La Verità ci Rende Liberi - Advanced Mind @LaVeritaCiRendeLiberiAdvanced · 68,789 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 August 2026
IL GRANDE RISVEGLIO @Unisciti_a_IGR · 19,428 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 1 October 2026
Michele Giovagnoli (canale ufficiale) @michelegiovagnoli · 36,937 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 September 2026
Alberto Ferrarini @ALBERTOFERRARINI · 63,401 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 August 2026
Amore Verità Libertà @Diegodibonito · 35,438 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 23 September 2026
Facciamo Finta Che @facciamofintache · 21,322 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 September 2026
RADIOGREG.info - SOLO PER LO 0.3% ☄☄☄ @radiogreginfo · 21,945 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 September 2026
Question Everything @thedoctorregenerated · 32,794 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 4 September 2026
THE FLAT EARTHER @theflateartherr · 26,273 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 September 2026
La Verità ci Rende Liberi e ci Fa Incazzare @Laveritacirendeliberiecifaincazz · 27,410 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026
ZAINZ 🐺 Canale Ufficiale ZainzTv @zainztv · 50,828 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IO SONO ANIMA - sentiero di consapevolezza 🐬✨🕉” (@IOsonoANIMA11), 13,381 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IOsonoANIMA11.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
