Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 44 days, net +47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,758–7,890 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 23:37
7,862
-13
14 Sept 2026, 21:17
7,875
+1
11 Sept 2026, 12:20
7,874
+4
6 Sept 2026, 17:56
7,870
+58
2 Sept 2026, 11:16
7,812
+39
30 Aug 2026, 01:03
7,773
-8
27 Aug 2026, 01:24
7,781
-4
23 Aug 2026, 20:26
7,785
-13
20 Aug 2026, 04:32
7,798
+1
16 Aug 2026, 22:13
7,797
-2
13 Aug 2026, 13:06
7,799
-10
10 Aug 2026, 05:02
7,809
+1
6 Aug 2026, 20:23
7,808
-7
6 Aug 2026, 03:05
7,815
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:45
7,815
first reading
Engagement
57 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.4%
avg views ÷ 7,862 subscribers
Avg views / post
895
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 57 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
57 (31 July 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
6,266
Reactions total
416
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
59s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,590 reactions across 52 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
1,085
23.6%
❤🔥
895
19.5%
💔
860
18.7%
🕊
499
10.9%
👍
494
10.8%
custom 5273715455708634839
393
8.56%
💅
265
5.77%
💩
39
0.85%
😢
38
0.828%
🖕
13
0.283%
👎
9
0.196%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,887 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤯 Карена Шаиняна оштрафовали за МОЙ ПОСТ на JGL
#гейновости
Помощни:ца мировой судьи Михалёвой в Москве принялась активно публиковать принятые этой Михалёвой политические решения, в том числе о штрафах за «ЛГБТ-пропаганду» для Жени Писемского, Ольги Барановой и вот Карена Шаиняна. И если Писемскому перечислили какое-то бесконечное количество публикаций, то у Шаиняна всего несколько штук, одна из которых — моего авто…
🎉 У Саши Казанцевой — юбилей!
Сложно вообще что-то пожелать, когда смотришь на человека снизу вверх. Без иронии считаю Сашу одной из великих квир-современниц: её уровень секс-просвета, книга, сайт, дохуище всего она сделала и сделает ещё
Дорогая Саша, с праздником тебя! Пусть у тебя всегда будет достаточное и более чем достаточное пространство безопасности, где ты будешь делать свои крутые штуки, или заниматься лич…
Хотел для примера найти фотку реально огромного дилдо так, чтобы было видно масштаб (типа, рядом с человеком). Листал-листал гуглофото, ничего мне не нравилось, и тут ЭТА ИМБА:
НАСТОЯЩИЙ ХОТДОГ
Пишут, что житель Уфы потерял в заднем проходе вибратор, когда по совету ChatGPT стал массировать простату ради профилактики рака. Проблема устройства была в том, что у него не было ограничителя.
Что правильно:
— массажировать простату — полезно и приятно,
— использовать профессиональные игрушки лучше, чем овощи,
— если провалился — сразу обращаться к врачам.
Что неправильно:
— выбирать устройство без ограничителя,…
Инстаграм Reels, кстати, заполонила мудрость сходного смысла:
«При мастурбации ты кончаешь только от последнего движения рукой, но это не значит, что все остальные были зря»
☝️🤓
Получил обратную связь:
«Если ты импотент, то все остальные движения точно ничего не изменят»
🚬🗿
Зачем спорить с гомофобами и расистами?
#голосавголове
Я недавно два текста написал на основе того, как с кем-то срался в комментариях: один раз про гомофобию, другой — про расизм. И я сам понимал в процессе, и когда писал и постил тексты, что своих собеседников я никак не переубедил, они наверняка очень довольны тем, как отстояли свои ценности перед набегом пидораса. Нахуя я тогда этим занимаюсь, ещё и так подробно…
Инстаграм предложил запостить в сторис первую фотку из галереи. Пришлось долго листать, чтобы обнаружить: самая первая фотка в моей галерее — ХУЙ. Мой хуй образца 2021 года. Мало того! Когда я полез за сфотографированным штрих-кодом карты магазина, вместо неё он же первый и открылся! Но скидок за дикпики у них нет 😒
«Я не против негров, но Елена должна быть Прекрасной!»
Очередной пример «я не расист, НО» по всему телеграму вызвало решение режиссёра Нолана взять чёрную Лупиту Нионго в фильм «Одиссея». Также комментаторы были возмущены, что Элиот Пейдж сыграет Ахиллеса (в реальности оказалось, что нет). Всё, говорят, повесточка и исторически недостоверно.
Чушь полная это нытьё!
«Историческая достоверность» имеет смысл в историч…
Лучшие друзья педиков — презики
Худшие враги геев — гондоны
🕊60😁36❤🔥17custom 52737154557086348391
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @gayfromprovinces. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@gayfromprovinces edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Любимый персонаж из диснеевской «Русалочки» (придётся выбрать один лот)
Никто13%
Ариэль (Русалочка)11%
Себастьян (душный краб)23%
Флаундер (жёлто-голубая рыбка)9%
Тритон (подводный царь, папа Ариэль, с трезубцем)6%
Эрик (человечий принц, в которого влюблена Ариэль)2%
Урчин (русал-твинк, якобы влюблённый в Ариэль, но бля)3%
Урсула (ведьма-цекаэлия с щупальцами вместо ног, главная антагонистка)27%
Кто-то ещё1%
Не могу определиться4%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Парни+ @parniplus_com · 30,276 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дневник пидора-провинциала” (@gayfromprovinces), 7,862 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gayfromprovinces.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
