Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for pokusala

Channel

pokusala

@pokusalapokusla

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,293subscribers

-390 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001706914027
TypeChannel
Username@pokusalapokusla
DescriptionРКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/67a47dd4a16f1b5542930a4a Связь: @RussianPatriot_bot По рекламе: https://t.me/politmanagertg @SMariyS @KrisPROTG @RA_tell_PROTG "Рекламное Агентство — @AdVibeTg", @mag_istrr @russiann_manager
Created26 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/pokusalapokusla

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

17,29317,68317,4885 August 2026 — 17,683 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,683 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,680 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,678 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,668 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,657 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,650 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,644 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,636 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,633 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,627 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,616 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,609 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,602 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,599 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,591 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,582 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,571 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,569 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,563 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,561 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,554 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,552 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,540 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,533 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,521 subscribers5 September 2026 — 17,512 subscribers9 September 2026 — 17,506 subscribers11 September 2026 — 17,501 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17,493 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,481 subscribers16 September 2026 — 17,471 subscribers19 September 2026 — 17,461 subscribers26 September 2026 — 17,434 subscribers4 October 2026 — 17,410 subscribers8 October 2026 — 17,396 subscribers14 October 2026 — 17,392 subscribers16 October 2026 — 17,383 subscribers17 October 2026 — 17,380 subscribers18 October 2026 — 17,373 subscribers19 October 2026 — 17,368 subscribers20 October 2026 — 17,362 subscribers21 October 2026 — 17,358 subscribers22 October 2026 — 17,353 subscribers23 October 2026 — 17,350 subscribers24 October 2026 — 17,346 subscribers25 October 2026 — 17,340 subscribers27 October 2026 — 17,337 subscribers28 October 2026 — 17,334 subscribers29 October 2026 — 17,330 subscribers30 October 2026 — 17,322 subscribers31 October 2026 — 17,318 subscribers1 November 2026 — 17,317 subscribers2 November 2026 — 17,315 subscribers4 November 2026 — 17,309 subscribers5 November 2026 — 17,306 subscribers6 November 2026 — 17,299 subscribers7 November 2026 — 17,296 subscribers8 November 2026 — 17,293 subscribers5 August 20268 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 95 days, net -390. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,235–17,742 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 16:4617,293-3
7 Nov 2026, 06:4017,296-3
6 Nov 2026, 05:3517,299-7
5 Nov 2026, 01:0017,306-3
4 Nov 2026, 00:4617,309-6
2 Nov 2026, 21:4717,315-2
1 Nov 2026, 22:5717,317-1
31 Oct 2026, 20:0817,318-4
30 Oct 2026, 19:2817,322-8
29 Oct 2026, 16:3517,330-4
28 Oct 2026, 12:4517,334-3
27 Oct 2026, 14:4917,337-3
25 Oct 2026, 13:5717,340-6
24 Oct 2026, 14:0117,346-4
23 Oct 2026, 16:4417,350-3
22 Oct 2026, 17:3817,353-5
21 Oct 2026, 14:2817,358-4
20 Oct 2026, 09:3917,362-6
19 Oct 2026, 12:4717,368-5
18 Oct 2026, 15:0017,373first reading

Engagement

64 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.4%
avg views ÷ 17,293 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,350
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 64 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held64 (20 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total46,850
Reactions total1,215
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 04:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈13,000
Videos
≈7,530
Links
≈2,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 36s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,969 reactions across 63 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2,17636.5%
🤣1,63727.4%
💯5889.85%
👍4567.64%
🔥3555.95%
❤1963.28%
🤪911.52%
👏891.49%
💊510.854%
🤔510.854%
😱420.704%
🥴290.486%
❤‍🔥280.469%
🤗240.402%
🙈230.385%
🤯210.352%
🍌200.335%
🙏200.335%
👀120.201%
🫡100.168%
17 further kinds500.838%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,035 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (14.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 15:23 UTC≈1,600 views78 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Не, ну это сильно. ❤️Мы в MAX 🔥Первый и второй канал в ТГ

😁76💯2

29 Oct 2026, 16:57 UTC≈3,100 views70 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Забавно, что ситуация с Курилами спровоцировала интернет войну Японии и Китая, которая все никак не утихнет. ❤️Мы в MAX 🔥Первый и второй канал в ТГ

😁54🔥13👍2👀1

24 Oct 2026, 16:47 UTC≈4,140 views107 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Путин такой трудоголик. Везде все успевает. ❤️Мы в MAX 🔥Первый и второй канал в ТГ

😁92❤9🙈3💯2🫡1

22 Oct 2026, 16:15 UTC≈3,840 views86 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

У кого-то начала развиваться биполярка. 🫥 ❤️Мы в MAX 🔥Первый и второй канал в ТГ

😁62💯21🔥3

18 Oct 2026, 19:24 UTC≈4,930 views97 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Наш кровавый режим на такое бы не пошел... 😁 ❤️Мы в MAX 🔥Первый и второй канал в ТГ

😁73💯19❤5

16 Oct 2026, 15:43 UTC≈3,640 views120 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @RussianPatriot_ru

Доброполье и Алексеево-Дружковка в ДНР освобождены Ну нихера себе. Сразу город и крупный поселок взяли. Молодцы! ❤️Мы в MAX 🔥Первый и второй канал в ТГ

🔥76❤‍🔥18🙏14❤12

16 Oct 2026, 15:30 UTC≈3,320 views64 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Кто же в итоге напердел? Загадка... ❤️Мы в MAX 🔥Первый и второй канал в ТГ

🤣51😁11🤔2

16 Oct 2026, 15:28 UTC≈2,890 views69 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Главный вопрос: стоит ли за этим Россия? Перешла ли она от газового шантажа к газовой аттаке? ❤️Мы в MAX 🔥Первый и второй канал в ТГ

🤣57😁10❤1💯1

16 Oct 2026, 15:27 UTC≈2,590 views48 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

⚡️Встреча с Зеленским стала пуком в лужу Слова летели как пердежь по ветру, но сделаных дел не навалили даже с кучку воробьевого помета. ❤️Мы в MAX 🔥Первый и второй канал в ТГ

😁30🤣16❤2

16 Oct 2026, 15:24 UTC≈2,960 views72 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Кто этот фантомный пердун? - Politico Евровстреча прошла идеально. Решений не приняли, зато кто-то все время пердел и испортил всем воздух. 😁 ❤️Мы в MAX 🔥Первый и второй канал в ТГ

🤣58😁12❤1💯1

14 Oct 2026, 16:58 UTC≈2,780 views60 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Твое лицо, когда ты своим хамством выбесил Трампа и остался без Старлинка. 😁 ❤️Мы в MAX 🔥Первый и второй канал в ТГ

🤣55🔥5

12 Oct 2026, 15:14 UTC≈3,300 views85 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Вот все бы боты были такими, как он. А то уже надоели со своим интимом. ❤️Мы в MAX 🔥Первый и второй канал в ТГ

😁61🤣15👍8💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @pokusalapokusla. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Jul 2026, 14:28 UTCAnonymous Poll328 voters

Кто станет следующим главнокомандующим ВСУ после Драпатого?

  1. Ссыкунов.31%
  2. Капитулянтов.50%
  3. Бегунов.6%
  4. Отступник.4%
  5. Очкошников.22%
  6. Свой вариант.5%

The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Хрюн Моржов
@hrunmorgov · 29,513
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
Мемчики от БлондБарчетты🔥
@memblondbarchetta · 19,230
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 October 2026
Цифровая Сатира
@dfhumor · 35,720
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 September 2026
Кострома | Новости | Происшествия
@Kostroma_crazy · 26,217
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“pokusala” (@pokusalapokusla), 17,293 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pokusalapokusla.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.