National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 95 days, net -877. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,965–22,232 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 21:09
21,111
-19
7 Nov 2026, 17:06
21,130
-9
6 Nov 2026, 17:01
21,139
-8
5 Nov 2026, 19:29
21,147
-22
4 Nov 2026, 16:55
21,169
-6
3 Nov 2026, 13:39
21,175
-2
2 Nov 2026, 15:17
21,177
-17
1 Nov 2026, 13:36
21,194
-11
31 Oct 2026, 10:08
21,205
-8
30 Oct 2026, 07:09
21,213
-11
29 Oct 2026, 04:57
21,224
-10
28 Oct 2026, 04:17
21,234
-12
27 Oct 2026, 02:55
21,246
+13
26 Oct 2026, 03:06
21,233
-1
24 Oct 2026, 05:18
21,234
-3
23 Oct 2026, 08:20
21,237
-12
22 Oct 2026, 07:29
21,249
-15
21 Oct 2026, 00:09
21,264
-4
19 Oct 2026, 23:58
21,268
-2
18 Oct 2026, 23:31
21,270
first reading
Engagement
436 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 80 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.61%
avg views ÷ 21,111 subscribers
Avg views / post
551
64 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
64
of 436 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 58 of 64 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
436 (5 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
35,261
Reactions total
656
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 16:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
8m 34s
Average length
1m 43s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,931 reactions across 397 posts, in 56 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,243
25.2%
🔥
819
16.6%
👍
355
7.20%
👎
256
5.19%
😁
177
3.59%
😱
164
3.33%
👀
152
3.08%
❤🔥
151
3.06%
🙏
131
2.66%
😍
109
2.21%
⚡
100
2.03%
✍
95
1.93%
🗿
95
1.93%
🤔
94
1.91%
😢
88
1.78%
🤬
66
1.34%
🤯
64
1.30%
👻
63
1.28%
💔
60
1.22%
🤣
60
1.22%
36 further kinds
589
11.9%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 411 of the 436 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,092 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 436 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 64 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
💎 Природный или синтетический алмаз: в чём разница и что выбрать
Бриллианты — важная часть ювелирной культуры: их выбирают как для помолвки и других особенных дат, так и в качестве эффектного акцента на каждый день. А современная альтернатива в виде синтетических огранённых алмазов сделала желанные изделия более доступными. В чем разница и что выбрать? Разбираемся вместе с экспертом «Академии Бриллиантов» Ниной Серг…
За покупками и общением: москвичи открывают для себя «рынкинг»
Походы на вещевые и продуктовые рынки получили новое название — «рынкинг». Об увлечении рассказал «Москвич Mag».
По наблюдениям издания, молодёжь ездит на рынки за вещами и перекусами, а затем показывает покупки в роликах с распаковками. Журналисты связывают интерес к вещевым рынкам с поиском доступных цен.
Другой вариант «рынкинга» — совместные походы…
Подростковое «могнуть» назвали словом года в Британии
Если у вас есть дети, то вы прекрасно знаете: тренд этот уже давно захватил и наших отпрысков. «Я тебя могну!» — кричат они при каждом удобном случае. И сверстникам, и нам.
«Могнуть» означает превзойти, быть лучше. «Я тебя могаю» или «Я тебя могну» значит «Я тебя лучше».
В Сети пишут, что происхождение оригинального слова отсылает к аббревиатуре AMOG, или Alpha…
🏠 Учимся правильно сдавать жильё
Даже с договором можно столкнуться с неприятностями — от незаконной субаренды до ущерба соседям.
Эксперты рассказали Metro, как правильно сдавать квартиру:
✅ Пропишите в договоре все основания для выселения. «Хочу и всё» не работает: закон (ст. 687 ГК РФ) чётко ограничивает причины.
✅ Запретите субаренду и посуточную сдачу, укажите, кто именно может жить в квартире.
✅ Составьте о…
🦴 22 млн россиян с хрупкими костями к 2050 году: врачей напугал страшный прогноз
В России 14 миллионов человек страдают от остеопороза, а еще 20 миллионов находятся в зоне риска, даже не подозревая об этом.
Многие думают, что это болезнь пожилых, но процесс снижения костной массы запускается уже после 35 лет. У женщин риск выше из-за гормональных изменений, но свою лепту вносят и вредные привычки: курение, алкоголь…
🎬 Сдвиг по вертикали
Вертикальные сериалы уже «порвали» китайский кинорынок: в 2025 году выручка от их размещения обошла традиционный прокат ($6,9 млрд против $5,8 млрд). Это самый быстрорастущий сегмент мирового видеорынка.
В России за первый квартал 2026 года приложения с короткими сериалами скачали более 850 млн раз – на 140% больше, чем годом ранее.
Что это за тренд? Вертикальные «микродрамы» — это истории с …
💔 Не стало Лидии Федосеевой-Шукшиной
14 октября её доставили в реанимацию из-за ухудшения состояния сердца. Там знаменитая актриса находилась в медикаментозной коме и дышала с помощью аппарата ИВЛ.
Состояние 88-летней звезды экрана врачи оценивали как тяжёлое, с отрицательной динамикой. Они сообщали, что сердце Федосеевой-Шукшиной бьётся нерегулярно, а позже появились проблемы с лёгкими: скопившийся в груди воздух …
🎤 Александр Панайотов объяснил изматывающий гастрольный график
Александр Панайотов занял вторые места на телепроектах «Народный артист» и «Голос». Но это только закалило его и сделало сильнее. Сегодня он является одним из самых гастролирующих артистов в нашей стране, у которого всегда аншлаги.
— Я так долго шёл к этому и так рад, что этот период у меня в жизни наконец-то наступил, — говорит Александр Панайотов. — В…
👴 Мошенники выманили у пенсионера 7,5 млн рублей в Ставрополье — как не попасться на схему
Псевдосотрудник правоохранительных органов убедил мужчину, что от его имени была оформлена доверенность на третье лицо и взят кредит, а сам он обвиняется в спонсировании террористов. Далее с мужчиной должен был связаться «представитель финансовой организации». Об этом рассказали в официальном аккаунте ГУ МВД России по Ставропо…
🍂 Добавьте эту вещь в гардероб — и привычные образы станут выглядеть дороже
Кожаная или замшевая юбка миди — идеальная база для осенне-зимнего гардероба. Она не требует сложных сочетаний: простая водолазка, кардиган или хлопковая рубашка раскроют её потенциал лучше всего.
Если хочется чуть более строгого образа, присмотритесь к гладкой коже. Прямая черная миди хорошо смотрится с серым джемпером, шоколадная — с голу…
Showing the 12 most recent of 436 posts we hold for @gazetametro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 6 posts on @gazetametro as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
47 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 436 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Вечерняя Москва @vmoskva · 123,440 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 September 2026
Темникова Юлия @temnikova_yuliya · 31,886 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 September 2026
Велобайк @velobikerus · 22,000 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Metro Москва” (@gazetametro), 21,111 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gazetametro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.