Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for gdh spor

Channel

gdh spor

@gdhspor

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,075subscribers

-87 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001712856825
TypeChannel
Username@gdhspor
DescriptionTürkiye ve dünya sporuna dair her şey, son dakikalar, analizler ve grafiklerle @gdhspor'da! Twitter: https://twitter.com/gdh_spor İnstagram: https://www.instagram.com/gdhspor/
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/gdhspor

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@gdhspor/40952 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC@spor_haberleri_futbol/351387 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC1.00under a minute
@gdhspor/40954 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC@spor_haberleri_futbol/351407 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC1.00under a minute
@gdhspor/40957 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC@spor_haberleri_futbol/351437 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC1.00under a minute
@gdhspor/40961 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC@spor_haberleri_futbol/351477 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC1.00under a minute
@gdhspor/40963 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC@spor_haberleri_futbol/351497 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC1.00under a minute
@gdhspor/40982 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC@spor_haberleri_futbol/351687 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@spor_haberleri_futbol9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (8–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 26 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @gdhspor — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7,0757,1907,132.56 August 2026 — 7,162 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,167 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,175 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,169 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,172 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,182 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,183 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,177 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,187 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,190 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,187 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,156 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,161 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,153 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,132 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,102 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,101 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,096 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,101 subscribers22 October 2026 — 7,092 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,084 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,087 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,075 subscribers6 August 202631 October 2026
23 measurements spanning 87 days, net -87. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,058–7,207 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Oct 2026, 19:287,075-12
28 Oct 2026, 20:307,087+3
25 Oct 2026, 09:187,084-8
22 Oct 2026, 00:267,092-9
18 Oct 2026, 23:087,101+5
15 Oct 2026, 12:587,096-5
12 Oct 2026, 12:087,101-1
5 Oct 2026, 18:207,102-30
28 Sept 2026, 05:387,132-21
18 Sept 2026, 20:007,153-8
14 Sept 2026, 07:197,161+5
10 Sept 2026, 05:357,156-31
5 Sept 2026, 00:007,187-3
1 Sept 2026, 10:577,190+3
29 Aug 2026, 14:557,187+10
26 Aug 2026, 14:577,177-6
23 Aug 2026, 12:237,183+1
19 Aug 2026, 15:587,182+10
16 Aug 2026, 14:487,172+3
13 Aug 2026, 00:067,169first reading

Engagement

278 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 7,075 subscribers
Avg views / post
812
116 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.768%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
116
of 278 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 97 of 116 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held278 (5 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total94,187
Reactions total683
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 14:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈37,500
Videos
≈6,900
Links
≈1,880

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
38m 58s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 59 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,696 reactions across 237 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤58534.5%
👏23814.0%
🤣1106.49%
😁875.13%
👍784.60%
🍌653.83%
👎653.83%
🔥633.71%
🤬613.60%
🤓563.30%
💊331.95%
🤝271.59%
⚡241.42%
❤‍🔥241.42%
😨231.36%
😢221.30%
🕊171.00%
✍160.943%
🤡150.884%
🥱140.825%
17 further kinds734.30%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 253 of the 278 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,932 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 278 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 116 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 14:15 UTC38 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

🗣️ İç sahada kaybedilen Ferencváros maçı sonrası Ruben Amorim: "Teknik olarak, taktiksel olarak ve özellikle zihinsel olarak bizden daha iyiydiler. Kazanmayı hak ettiler."

❤1

6 Nov 2026, 14:04 UTC136 viewsread 6 November 2026
Video

⏱️ 17' Manchester United 0-2 Roma ⏱️ 86' Manchester United 3-2 Roma Matheus Cunha'nın galibiyeti getiren golü tribünden böyle kaydedildi.

6 Nov 2026, 13:51 UTC231 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🗣️ Emre Belözoğlu: "Fenerbahçe beni 39 yaşımda transfer etti, ben 40 yaşımda hizmet ettim. Benim için futbolcunu yaşı yok. Fenerbahçe için kriter tutku ve kalitedir. Güncel futbol daha dinamik, daha atlet oyuncularla oynanıyor. Mevki gözetmeksizin daha dinamik oyuncular kullanılıyor. Bundan bağımsız Fenerbahçe'nin mevcut kadrosuna inanarak geldim. Birbirimizi tanıdıkça, takımı tanıdıkça değerlendirmelerimiz olacaktır…

🍌1🥱1

6 Nov 2026, 13:49 UTC198 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🗣️ Emre Belözoğlu: "Bir teknik adamın 4 kere gidip gelmesi, yönetenlerin teveccühüdür, gelen hoca da hak ettiği için gelmiştir. Fenerbahçe'nin beklentisini herkes elinden geldiğince karşılamaya çalıştım. 5 sene önce gittiğimde daha az yoğunluk vardı. Taraftarın beklentisi her zaman vardır. 1 sene bile olmasa beklenti vardır ama bu yük arttı. Bu manipüle edilebiliyor. Akıl ve gerçekten gönülden, samimi Fenerbahçeliler…

6 Nov 2026, 13:46 UTC166 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🎙️ Soru: "TFF ve MHK ile mücadele eden bir Emre Belözoğlu görecek miyiz, yoksa yönetime bırakacak mıyız?" 🗣️ Emre Belözoğlu: "5 sene önceki Emre değilim ama değişmeyen şeyler var. Fenerbahçe için herkesle, düşünmeden, TFF dahil olmak üzere, MHK dahil olmak üzere, sınırlar içinde Fenerbahçe'nin haklarını korurum. Fenerbahçe hakkı olmayan bir şeyi istemez. Bu koltuğa layık davranmak zorundayız. Ne olursa olsun herkesl…

6 Nov 2026, 13:45 UTC164 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🎙️ Soru: "Teklif size ne zaman geldi? Derbiden sonra böyle bir süreç yaşanacağı aklınıza geldi mi?" 🗣️ Emre Belözoğlu: "Benim için zirve burasıdır! Anadolu'da, yaşadığım her yerde yaşadığım her şeyi tecrübe olarak gördüm, hazırlandığımız yer burasıydı. Geldiğinde hazır olmak lazım. Onun bir sınırı var. Bize güvenenler çok, bize inanmayanların da güvenmeyenlerin de olduğunu anlamam gerekiyor. Bunu tersine çevirmek ya…

6 Nov 2026, 13:45 UTC131 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Napoli, pazar günü Lazio'yu yenemezse Allegri'nin görevden alınması gündeme gelebilir. Soyunma odasındaki bölünmüşlük ise hiç olmadığı kadar derinleşmiş durumda. 🔗 La Gazzetta dello Sport

6 Nov 2026, 13:43 UTC163 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🗣️ Emre Belözoğlu: "Kalbimdeki en büyük yerdeyim. Fenerbahçe için her şeye değer. Yeter ki Fenerbahçe için iyi olsun. Bunun sebebi, vesilesi olanlardan biri olalım. Bundan daha büyük bir şeref yok."

6 Nov 2026, 13:41 UTC165 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🎙️ Soru: "Sene sonunda neyi görürse insanlar, taraftarlar, yönetim 'Emre Belözoğlu başarılıdır' demeli?" 🗣️ Emre Belözoğlu: "En basiti kupalar. Kupalar değerli ve önemli. Oynattığımız oyun beklentileri karşılayacaktır. En yakın sürede olacaktır. Bu genlerin ne istediğini biliyorum, ben de sahanın içinden geliyorum. Yönetim bize teveccüh gösterdi ama ben oyunculara çok inanıyorum. İşin sonuna kadar şampiyonluğu koval…

6 Nov 2026, 13:40 UTC166 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🎙️ Soru: "Okan Buruk ile olan pozitif ilişkiniz Fenerbahçe taraftarlarını rahatsız etmekte. Fenerbahçe taraftarlarını rahatlatmak için bu konuda bir şeyler söyler misiniz?" 🗣️ Emre Belözoğlu: "Geçmişten gelen arkadaşlıklar, dostluklar saygı duymamız gereken bir durum. Ben ilişkilerimde mesafeyi korumuşumdur. Eşiniz dahi olsa mesafe olmalıdır, ben mesafeyi korumuşumdur. Fenerbahçe mevzu olduğunda ben buraya transfe…

👍1

6 Nov 2026, 13:37 UTC196 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🎙️ Soru: "9 puanlık fark ile ilgili neler söylemek istersin?" 🗣️ Emre Belözoğlu: "Bu bir süreç. Her anına inanmak lazım. Fenerbahçe her daim, hele sezonun bu döneminde şampiyonluğa talip olduğunu söylemek zorunda. Biz de beklentilerin farkındayız. Ben buraya evet Fenerbahçe'yi çok seviyorum, bu camianın içinde olmak şeref, ben oyuncu grubuna çok inandığım için de buraya geldim. Bu camiayı birleştirecek, son dönemde …

6 Nov 2026, 13:34 UTC196 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🗣️ Emre Belözoğlu: "Fenerbahçe'de herhangi bir görev almak, teknik direktörlük koltuğu biraz popüler olsa da her görev çok zordur. Başkan olmak, yönetici olmak, çalışan olmak çok zor. Burası tutkuyla bağlanmanız gereken bir camia. Geçmişte 10 haftalık dönemde geldiğimde kendi bilgimce, tecrübesiz bir teknik adam olarak çok farklı bir senaryo vardı. 10 maçta 7 galibiyet aldık ama rakibe, planlara hakim geldiğimiz nok…

Showing the 12 most recent of 278 posts we hold for @gdhspor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Bilalyazaronline1905
@bilalyazaronlinee · 30,540
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 5 September 2026
Gündem360
@gundem360 · 23,685
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 September 2026
HASTA CİMBOMLULAR
@galatasaray8 · 21,893
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 23 September 2026
Gayri Haber
@gayrihaberr · 58,907
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
TÜRKİYE SONDAKİKA
@receptayyiperdogan_cumhurbaskani · 46,033
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 23 August 2026
Medya Haber
@haberturkiyemedya · 44,174
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 August 2026
Tam90futbol
@tam90futboll · 25,126
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 30 September 2026
Bgyeter
@bgytelegramm · 28,443
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 8 September 2026
BPT
@bpthaber · 346,966
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 14 August 2026
Öğretmenler Sayfası
@ogretmenler_sayfasi · 25,721
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 September 2026
Şahin Özkan️
@sahinozkan000 · 169,997
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 30 September 2026
gdh
@gundemedairhs · 51,383
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
İnfaz Cinayet
@haberler9 · 21,655
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 24 September 2026
Postal Haber
@postalhabergundem · 54,624
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
HABER LİMANI
@haberlimanii · 37,907
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 30 August 2026
HABERİNİZ OLSUN
@haberinizolsungangalargrubu · 24,333
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 16 September 2026
Memurlar.net
@memurlarnett · 20,811
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 September 2026
MEB’den Haber Var 🔈🔉🔊
@mebduyurulari1 · 18,443
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 3 October 2026
Solcu Gazete
@solcugazete · 325,181
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 14 August 2026
Ulusal Haber
@ulusalhabeer · 66,817
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 20 August 2026
MHA
@mhahabertg · 149,923
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
Asayiş Berkemal
@asayisberkemaltr · 306,018
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 August 2026
ANTİRTUK SON DAKİKA GÜNDEM
@haberlerw · 96,587
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 August 2026
İbrahim Haskologlu
@ibrahimhaskologlu · 102,810
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 45 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“gdh spor” (@gdhspor), 7,075 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gdhspor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.