Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net -150. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,310–15,505 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 12:41
15,332
-9
16 Sept 2026, 06:41
15,341
-5
14 Sept 2026, 15:21
15,346
-11
13 Sept 2026, 02:21
15,357
-6
11 Sept 2026, 00:37
15,363
-10
8 Sept 2026, 02:02
15,373
-8
5 Sept 2026, 01:56
15,381
-6
3 Sept 2026, 09:43
15,387
-11
2 Sept 2026, 05:05
15,398
-1
1 Sept 2026, 05:45
15,399
-6
31 Aug 2026, 07:57
15,405
-1
30 Aug 2026, 07:26
15,406
-5
29 Aug 2026, 06:35
15,411
-2
28 Aug 2026, 03:54
15,413
-4
26 Aug 2026, 00:52
15,417
+3
25 Aug 2026, 03:43
15,414
-6
24 Aug 2026, 00:24
15,420
-2
22 Aug 2026, 05:54
15,422
-8
20 Aug 2026, 18:36
15,430
-5
19 Aug 2026, 19:05
15,435
first reading
Engagement
78 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 15,332 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,760
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 78 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
78 (29 July 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
52,769
Reactions total
2,006
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 45s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,679 reactions across 78 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
2,583
45.5%
💯
728
12.8%
👍
427
7.52%
🔥
293
5.16%
🙈
280
4.93%
🤔
274
4.82%
🗿
251
4.42%
🤡
219
3.86%
🤯
194
3.42%
😭
135
2.38%
❤
127
2.24%
🫡
88
1.55%
💩
52
0.916%
💊
28
0.493%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,679 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 78 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @geodnishe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 78 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
-44% за последние 5 лет...
Если это "небольшой минус", то хотелось бы НЕ увидеть, что тут считается большим...
Математически, чтобы компенсировать это падение, рынку нужно вырасти на ~80% с текущих
Т.е чтобы реализовался сценарий "все восстановится" должно произойти то, чего не происходило никогда в современной истории рынка
Инвесторы в "небольшом минусе" в ожидании большого чуда...
Яркий пример, как легко манипулировать мнением (сознанием) добряков…
«эта пастанова ви че верити»
Тут комментировать только портить. Пока робот не даст ему лично пизды, он не будет видеть опасности в происходящем…
И даже когда будет опиздюлен железякой, наверняка найдет причины оправдать ебучий скайнет !!
А мое дело лишь предупредить вас, дальше сами за себя переживайте…
18+
Давно этой рубрики не было и все как-то уже подзабыли, но тут случай просто пиздец…
Ранее уже была целая подборка, основное тут - https://t.me/geodnishe/12487
Раньше это все были ролики с других стран и материков, что нас не особо волновало… Но теперь этот пиздец произошел У НАС В РОССИИ !!!!!!!!
ЕЩЕ РАЗ ГОВОРЮ, ПРОЧИТАЙТЕ 👇
Железяки продолжают «прощупывать почву» и работают точечно, но в какой-то момент эти…
Мало кто заметил из-за шумихи, но в последние дни все активнее снимаются ограничения с российских организаций - например сегодня сняли конские санкции !!!
Скоро-скоро договорнячок, скоро-скоро…
Летняя сезонная дефляция закончилась, дешевеющие огурчики и помидорчики нам больше не помогут…
А старые проблемы остались (и усилились) - последствия ударов по НПЗ и маркетплейсам, индексация ЖКХ, падающий рубль, дефицит бюджета + «на фронте» звучат свежие нотки эскалации (вчерашняя угроза гражданской авиации РФ).
ЧУТ-ЧУТ ПАЗЛ НЕ СКЛАДЫВАЕТСЯ В ПОЛЬЗУ ДЕФЛЯЦИИ 🤏
На этом фоне интересно послушать, что скажет ЦБ на з…
Походу зря пиздел, наконец-то здравые учебники пошли 👍
🤣39🙈16💯10🔥8🫡6🗿4💊2😭2
Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @geodnishe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Облигации | Invest Assistance @investassistancebonds · 41,695 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
INSpace | Инвестиции @INSpac3 · 34,350 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
ALEXANDER POLYARNIY @alexpolyarniy · 43,198 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
V️enividivici @VENIVIDIVICIASHFXPRO · 53,846 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
SosisochnayaGazeta @sosisochnayagazeta · 76,100 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
Rockettothemoon @rockettothemooonASHFXPRO · 64,872 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 August 2026
Вячеслав Таквель (Goodwin) @GoodwinPro1 · 57,306 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Биржевик | Акции @birzhevikstocksofficial2 · 69,506 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Аналитика Мосбиржи @analytics_moex · 34,938 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 2 September 2026
🏡 Уютный Трейд | Инвестиции @cozytrade · 101,771 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
Обучалка @obuchalkaof · 40,152 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
Профита нет. А если найду? @profitanet · 202,903 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
Старый трейдер. Инвестиции и трейдинг @stari_trader · 59,276 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
СИГНАЛЫ от CASHFLOW @Cashflowbuy · 49,536 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
Федор Сидоров | Инвестиции – это просто @fedorinvest · 68,894 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Алексей Линецкий @alexeylinetsky · 30,076 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
БАЗА Бизнеса | Финансы @BizBazza · 58,399 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
PROFIT @profit1 · 186,020 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Day Trading Live @DayTradingLiveTG · 129 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
ИнвестТема | Литвинов Владимир @particular_trader · 35,526 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
Cashflow - Ваш денежный поток @CashflowTime · 52,444 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Дивидендный миллионер @Div_millioner · 28,786 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Георгий Днище” (@geodnishe), 15,332 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/geodnishe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.