Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Анна Ященко | про энергию и счастье

Channel

Анна Ященко | про энергию и счастье

@gettingclose

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,794subscribers

-103 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001193742930
TypeChannel
Username@gettingclose
DescriptionАвтор книги "Недодали". Скачать "Волшебные фразы-Стабилизаторы" в шапке канала. Даю ЛУЧШЕЕ из того, что реально работает. Психология, планирование, личная эффективность. Личка - @annaiashchenko Все-все курсы и бесплатности - https://energytime1.ru/
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/gettingclose

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,7945,8975,845.56 August 2026 — 5,897 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,896 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,886 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,880 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,872 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,870 subscribers21 August 2026 — 5,868 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,867 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,865 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,858 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,853 subscribers7 September 2026 — 5,847 subscribers11 September 2026 — 5,845 subscribers15 September 2026 — 5,841 subscribers26 September 2026 — 5,838 subscribers12 October 2026 — 5,831 subscribers15 October 2026 — 5,829 subscribers18 October 2026 — 5,823 subscribers21 October 2026 — 5,818 subscribers24 October 2026 — 5,814 subscribers26 October 2026 — 5,811 subscribers29 October 2026 — 5,804 subscribers1 November 2026 — 5,801 subscribers4 November 2026 — 5,794 subscribers6 August 20264 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 90 days, net -103. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,779–5,912 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 14:265,794-7
1 Nov 2026, 04:385,801-3
29 Oct 2026, 14:495,804-7
26 Oct 2026, 23:555,811-3
24 Oct 2026, 05:505,814-4
21 Oct 2026, 11:285,818-5
18 Oct 2026, 06:265,823-6
15 Oct 2026, 06:005,829-2
12 Oct 2026, 01:025,831-7
26 Sept 2026, 13:015,838-3
15 Sept 2026, 21:205,841-4
11 Sept 2026, 19:175,845-2
7 Sept 2026, 03:375,847-6
2 Sept 2026, 17:075,853-5
30 Aug 2026, 18:135,858-7
28 Aug 2026, 00:385,865-2
24 Aug 2026, 18:545,867-1
21 Aug 2026, 02:345,868-2
17 Aug 2026, 19:575,870-2
15 Aug 2026, 01:055,872first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.50%
avg views ÷ 5,794 subscribers
Avg views / post
260
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 51 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held51 (27 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total5,209
Reactions total253
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 18:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,790
Videos
≈293
Links
≈3,430

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

628 reactions across 49 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤28044.6%
🔥22636.0%
👍436.85%
😁325.10%
👏233.66%
💯111.75%
🥰60.955%
🙏50.796%
👀10.159%
😱10.159%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 628 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (40.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 05:36 UTC158 views14 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

)))) Я не предлагаю всех прощать. Вообще, прощение - чаще всего лишнее действие, особенно, если никто не стоит перед тобой на коленях с просьбой его простить. А вот отпустить, ОТЦЕПИТЬСЯ САМОМУ и забить - чаще всего да, будет эффективнее всего. Чаще всего это именно ТЫ висишь мыслями и действиями на крючке, на этом человеке. Отпусти уже ) И займись своей прекрасной, драгоценной и единственной жизнью. В ней так мн…

❤9🔥5

3 Nov 2026, 12:55 UTC208 views5 reactionsread 4 November 2026

И осталось ровно 1 место на ВИП Опоры. Я сделала дешево в этот раз. И уже все разобрали. Кто хочет более личную и анонимную работу, тоже забирайте: https://energytime1.ru/opora

❤5

3 Nov 2026, 06:25 UTC231 views13 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Джипити мне сделал. Ну вот в голове у меня примерно такое переполнение. Правда оно несколько не так выглядит, а как блуждающие миры разного рода, которые я скрещиваю между собой и обращаюсь то к одним, то к другим. А в дне и в жизни у меня порядок в целом, поэтому дел вроде бы столько, но они притушаются, отодвигаются. А в текущем дне 3-5 главных задач, переполнения такого нет. Не назвала бы себя Вьетнамоманкой ) …

❤8🔥3👍2

3 Nov 2026, 06:24 UTC205 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

В интернете новый тренд: закидываем ChatGPT (или где вы больше общаетесь, но джипити лучше всех делает картинки, поэтому лучше в него) фотку с комнатой и просим: Заполни эту комнату всем, что ты обо мне знаешь, оставив только моё лицо. Преувеличивай

2 Nov 2026, 12:36 UTC234 views14 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

- А какие авторские методы вы применяли в выращивании пофигистов? - Ну, например, такие ))))

😁7❤3👏2🔥2

2 Nov 2026, 12:32 UTC220 views17 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

- Чем вы занимались вторую половину своей жизни? - Растила пофигистов. О том, что я - пофигист, писала тут

👍6😁6❤4🔥1

2 Nov 2026, 10:25 UTC223 views24 reactionsread 4 November 2026

"У тебя одни из самых демократичных цен. И это помогает сейчас, в не самое простое время, находить возможность подключаться к твоим программам. (которые несут в себе и возможности стать сильнее и лучше справляться с этим временем. Но все же и многие другие программы обучения мы тоже выбираем, в сущности, чтобы лучше справляться со своими задачами. Хотя у тебя программы особые, конечно. Но все же, думаю, что ты во мн…

❤15💯4👏3🔥2

2 Nov 2026, 07:16 UTC220 views18 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Доброго дня )

🔥9❤4😁4👍1

1 Nov 2026, 13:00 UTC236 views5 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Оказывается, была неверная ссылка на "Опору на себя" в посте выше со вчерашнего дня....... ох Поменяла на правильную: https://energytime1.ru/opora

❤5

1 Nov 2026, 11:36 UTC239 views14 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Думала, запишу вам кружочек, на закате.. а потом не стала ) Волны и ветер шумят. Нету микрофона у меня сейчас ) Хотя вроде что-то слышно было. https://energytime1.ru/familyguide - последний день супер ранняя цена на Семейный гайд - как починить и утеплить любые отношения с близкими. От семьи до друзей и коллег. Много много интересного туда запечатала!

❤8👍2🔥2😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @gettingclose. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@gettingclose edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Nice&Easy / Нутрициолог Дарья Савельева
@perekusovnet · 39,141
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Анна Ященко | про энергию и счастье” (@gettingclose), 5,794 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gettingclose.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.