Photo, posted without a caption
![Telegram profile photo for [충간지의 글로벌 의료기기/디지털 헬스/로보틱스 연구소]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/74/74b12ff87af181b1a5a051d5f045028c86c901f24516ab6a7279c65e88adbd09.jpg)
Channel
[충간지의 글로벌 의료기기/디지털 헬스/로보틱스 연구소]
@globalmedtech
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,057subscribers
-72 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001346864141 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @globalmedtech |
| Created | 25 August 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 49 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/globalmedtech |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Oct 2026, 02:50 | 12,057 | +20 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:58 | 12,037 | -2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:25 | 12,039 | -1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:46 | 12,040 | -2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:17 | 12,042 | -2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:40 | 12,044 | -1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:27 | 12,045 | -5 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:11 | 12,050 | -6 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:00 | 12,056 | -4 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:35 | 12,060 | -1 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 13:38 | 12,061 | -3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 13:36 | 12,064 | -3 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 12:50 | 12,067 | -2 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 15:19 | 12,069 | -5 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 16:31 | 12,074 | +1 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 12:56 | 12,073 | +3 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 04:40 | 12,070 | +1 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 12:38 | 12,069 | -26 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 23:42 | 12,095 | -7 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 12,102 | first reading |
Engagement
101 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 101 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
655 reactions across 96 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 271 | 41.4% | |
| ❤ | 190 | 29.0% | |
| 😁 | 110 | 16.8% | |
| 😢 | 61 | 9.31% | |
| 🤯 | 23 | 3.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 99 of the 101 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 675 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 101 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
📰 충간지의 Global MedTech/Robotics News with Claude(9/3) 1.MedTech (1)Medtronic FY2027 Q1 실적…매출 $98억(+13.7%), 연간 유기 성장 가이던스 상향. 동시에 $7.8억 투자 2건 발표 -9/1 발표. 매출 $98억(+13.7% YoY, 컨센 대비 약 $2.2억 상회). Cardiovascular·Medical Surgical 모두 두 자릿수 성장. Affera Sphere-9 PFA·Hugo·CathWorks 기여. 연간 유기 매출 성장 가이던스 상향. CEO Martha: "이 결과들은 비즈니스의 내구성에 대한 우리의 확신을 강화한다". 동시에 PFA 스타트업 + 신경조절 분야 두 건 합산 약 $7.8억 투자 발표 -링크: https://www.medtechdiv…
스카이랩스의 B2C전략은 과연 어떤 그림일까? https://youtu.be/gl7ekh_MzSw?si=2Ttu8v1xAf-UOaeS
❤1👍1
음 HIRA 통계가 이상하다. 담당자한테 전화를 해도 잘모르는것 같다. 관세청데이터가 시장을 교란시킨다고 지역이나 국가인가 데이터제공을 중단한다는데 그런 맥락인가?
🤯3
26년 1월 씨어스 씽크 관련 EX871 수가통계 - 25년 1만병상 돌파의 레버리지효과가 드러남. - 월 사용량 12만건 돌파. 월 진료금액54억원 돌파 - 전년대비 364% 성장. 전월대비 63% 성장.
👍9😢4
너무너무 얼굴이 또렷하고 모든 기억이 또렷한데 이름이.. 기억안나는 현상이 심해지는것 같다. 심지어 바로 앞에 앉아있는 후배한테도 너 ... 저기 뭐냐 그.. 이럴때고 있고. 원래 이런건가. 이름이 기억이 안난다.. ㅜ
😢16😁4❤1👍1
📰 충간지의 Global MedTech/Robotics News with Claude(9/2) 1.MedTech (1)Medtronic FY2027 Q1 실적…매출 $98억(+13.7%), Cardiovascular·MedSurg 두 자릿수 성장. 연간 유기 성장 가이던스 상향. 동시에 $7.8억 투자 2건 발표 -9/1 발표. Medtronic이 FY2027 Q1에서 두 자릿수 매출 성장을 달성하며 회계연도를 좋은 출발로 시작했다. 매출 $98억(+13.7% YoY, 컨센 대비 약 $2.2억 상회). Cardiovascular(PFA·Hugo·CathWorks 기여)·Medical Surgical 모두 두 자릿수 성장. CEO Martha: "이 결과들은 비즈니스의 내구성에 대한 우리의 확신을 강화한다" -연간 유기 매출 성장 가이던…
👍3😁1😢1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍2
정말 이 코딱지 만한 동네에 바람잘날이 없군. 이슈코멘트 부자 섹터.
😁5😢2
Photo, posted without a caption
👍5😁2
파마리서치 입장. 기사에서 언급된 논문 철회는 당사 리쥬란 3상 임상 관련 논문이 맞습니다. 다만 임상시험은 개발사가 비용을 부담하여 진행하는 것이 통상적인 절차이며, 기사에 언급된 당사 연구원은 전임상 동물실험에만 참여했을 뿐 확증 임상에는 관여한 바 없습니다. 해당 논문의 철회는 저자 기재사항 누락에 대한 출판위원회의 지적을 수용한 데 따른 것입니다. 논문에 명시된 바와 같이 임상 데이터 자체에는 어떠한 오염도 없으며, 리쥬란 허가에는 영향이 없는 상황임을 명확히 말씀드립니다. 동 기사는 제목이 너무 선정적이고, 유료기사라 내용 확인이 안되어 우려가 커지는 것을 걱정하여 선제적으로 안내 드리는 건 이며 본문에 수정이 필요한 사항들은 언론사와 협업할 예정입니다.
🤯5😢4
회사에서 곧 대응할 예정이라고 합니다. https://pharm.edaily.co.kr/News/Read?newsId=02128726645575856&mediaCodeNo=257
🤯7😁3
Showing the 12 most recent of 101 posts we hold for @globalmedtech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@bioksm · 14,9723 posts비지니스업데이터
@hybrided_korean · 4062 posts주식플러스✨️
@ISTockPlus · 6281 post제리 Of Wall Street 📈
@JerryofInvestment · 1,9931 post뺀지뤼의 SKLab.(스크랩)
@bbanjil · 10,6961 post한양증권 제약/바이오 오병용
@bdragon0808 · 13,4721 post[미래에셋박수진] 중국/홍콩 증시를 봅니다
@chinadagudong · 7,5031 post유진투자증권 산업분석실 컨슈머/전략산업팀
@eugenetmm · 3,1471 post호그니엘
@hogniel · 15,2871 post[미래 임희석] 인터넷/SW/게임
@mirae_internet · 8,1281 post팔칠사공스토너 실전투자 인사이트
@stoner8740 · 10,8951 postAnselm's Library
@tooboldbutstillmakessense · 1491 post어른센스💪
@twohundredthousandwon · 1,4241 post야자반 - Y.Z. stock
@yaza_stock · 13,0731 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@darthacking · 65,5193 posts미래에셋 제약/바이오 김승민
@bioksm · 14,9721 post[미래에셋박수진] 중국/홍콩 증시를 봅니다
@chinadagudong · 7,5031 post[미래에셋 배터리/디스플레이 김철중] 디배저
@cjdbj · 16,3631 post한국투자증권 금융 정태준
@financejeong · 1,3351 post[미래 임희석] 인터넷/SW/게임
@mirae_internet · 8,1281 post키움증권 신민수 의료기기 기록보관소
@sms_archive · 3,3281 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@globalmedtech named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@huhpharm · 24,260
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
@SmallCap · 23,033
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[충간지의 글로벌 의료기기/디지털 헬스/로보틱스 연구소]” (@globalmedtech), 12,057 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/globalmedtech.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.