Лига пришла в себя. И если с днями у меня всё ок, то с ресурсами нет. У меня было всего 2-3 ключа и 800+ изумрудов.. Я бы обрадовалась, но пользоваться ими боюсь, вдруг забанят? Проверяйте свои аккаунты!

Channel
(глоть) чашечку чая ☕️
@glotcupoftea
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,085subscribers
-34 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001970152516 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @glotcupoftea |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/glotcupoftea |
Topic
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 09:59 | 5,085 | -7 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 5,092 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 5,095 | -5 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 5,100 | -8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 5,108 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:27 | 5,115 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 5,117 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 5,116 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 5,119 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 5,123 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 5,125 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 5,119 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 5,119 | first reading |
Engagement
46 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 46 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 02s
- Average length
- 31s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,572 reactions across 45 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,716 | 37.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 965 | 21.1% | |
| 💘 | 607 | 13.3% | |
| 🌚 | 302 | 6.61% | |
| 😭 | 262 | 5.73% | |
| 🔥 | 257 | 5.62% | |
| 💯 | 149 | 3.26% | |
| 💔 | 128 | 2.80% | |
| 🤯 | 118 | 2.58% | |
| 🙏 | 39 | 0.853% | |
| 😘 | 13 | 0.284% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 0.197% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 0.153% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,572 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 31
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 5
- of 46 we hold a reading for · 11%
- Most on one post
- 25
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @glotcupoftea. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 46 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🖤
😭75💯16❤7💔4🌚2
Маник только пора бы обновить 😇
❤49💯14💔4
Оу маааай 💪
💘65❤🔥18🔥12🌚9❤3😢2
Думаю пойду посмотрю комментарии в офке, может я не одна такая.. Тем временем комментарии в офке:
💘51🤯29🌚17😭11😘3❤1
Как удачно фрагмент слился с песком.. если кто-то что-то видит, поделитесь догадками, потому что у меня по нулям 😭
❤🔥38❤9💯2😭2
Что ж, ну это знак, что я все-таки смогу успеть до обновы КР пойти облизать Шэня со всех сторон в СП, а также убить Йошико ради развилок в ПЖ 🥺 ps. Йошико в комментариях, заранее прости 🥺
❤63💯9🌚5
Ухватила сотку с Озаром, осталось всего две до получения бейджа! Кстати, ветка с волхвом хороша и он сам красивый. Если бы история мне зашла, то прочитала бы вдумчиво. А еще у него кайфовая музыкальная тема 😇
❤🔥76🔥21❤20🌚4
Довольная, как слон, потому что заказала арт с Леоном 🤗🤗🤗 ps. покупка очень даже полезная!!
❤🔥91❤27🔥23💘4
В общем я подумала, и решила, что это очень сложно. Попросту потому, что историй, в которых я знаю динамику и развитие каждой ветки очень мало! Ну и немножко переживаю, что меня закидают камнями за некоторые субъективные мнения 😭
❤69😭11💔9
Собственно я не спешу вообще никак судить эту историю из-за не заинтересовавших анонсов, тк моя первая реакция на ту же Бездушную была такой (это одна из моих любимых историй в КР): PS. Интересно, кто-нибудь помнит про морковку…
❤116🌚17🔥13💯2
Не смотря на то, что анонсы не вызвали интерес, я очень рада возвращению Винси! Надеюсь она успела отдохнуть и была готова приступить к этой истории. Хочу пожелать ей огромной удачи с этой историей 💗 PS. Судя по описанию ГГ одна, но не дает покоя мысль о трех действующих лицах, ведь в таком случае у нас действительно один из ГГ - мужчина и одновременно ветка. Это будет интересным экспериментом 🥺
❤121🙏28❤🔥17💘4💔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @glotcupoftea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@frostkitsuneartg · 2,6653 postsРыжий журналист. Леон Хьюз 🦊
@leonhughes · 532 posts𝘷𝘪𝘣𝘦: Ашриэль Карн
@Ashriel_Karn · 3851 postЖелейная лягушка | О визуальных новеллах
@Mamafrogge · 2,7121 postВ шатре Адиля 🏜️
@adilbadavi · 5071 postклшнв | клуб романтики🧩
@clshnvnovels · 9,8281 postCygnet’s nest
@cyanogoth · 4371 post•Jenny Skog art | Женькин лес•
@jennyskogart · 6821 postАверрис: Дитя Разлома | ПТЛ&ВРС&ЭС Истории о любви | Клуб Романтики
@lovestories_rc · 11,0811 postПод покровом Гоэтии || ППГ
@noeswife · 1,7881 postвизуальный бутерброд ♡
@rclover211 · 6981 postлёшины пиксели 👁🫦👁
@trapushaRC · 381 postВагон селёдки
@vagonseledki · 2,7281 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@romance_club_knights · 43,149
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 29 August 2026
@historiesbynancy · 44,267
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026
@sevenheartsstories · 44,416
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 28 August 2026
@guides_lod · 27,284
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 September 2026
@elena_k_rc · 39,986
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 30 August 2026
@oformlenie_dnevnika_bloknota · 28,489
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“(глоть) чашечку чая ☕️” (@glotcupoftea), 5,085 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glotcupoftea.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.