Те самые гайды по Клубу Романтики ;)
Бот с нашими гайдами – @nvta_rcbot
Хранилище с нашими гайдами – https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/15HhMjNxCnLZR0Q4aMnw9R9UYOYThdTo8
Мы на бусти – https://boosty.to/nvta_rc
По вопросам бана – @gonna_wind_up_dead
Created
20 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
49 measurements spanning 80 days, net +603. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 64,712–65,706 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 49
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Oct 2026, 15:05
65,463
-19
24 Oct 2026, 14:27
65,482
-22
23 Oct 2026, 14:36
65,504
-25
22 Oct 2026, 17:59
65,529
-20
21 Oct 2026, 14:38
65,549
-16
20 Oct 2026, 14:07
65,565
+3
19 Oct 2026, 16:56
65,562
-29
18 Oct 2026, 16:20
65,591
+14
17 Oct 2026, 17:40
65,577
+25
16 Oct 2026, 15:46
65,552
+10
15 Oct 2026, 18:36
65,542
+20
14 Oct 2026, 20:26
65,522
-14
13 Oct 2026, 08:56
65,536
-21
9 Oct 2026, 06:21
65,557
+71
4 Oct 2026, 19:37
65,486
+392
27 Sept 2026, 00:17
65,094
-115
17 Sept 2026, 13:39
65,209
-31
15 Sept 2026, 11:20
65,240
-10
13 Sept 2026, 17:36
65,250
-8
11 Sept 2026, 20:21
65,258
first reading
Engagement
156 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 162 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.6%
avg views ÷ 65,463 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,900
52 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
52
of 156 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 October 2026
Posts held
156 (31 July 2026 – 25 October 2026)
Views total
668,700
Reactions total
14,052
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Oct 2026, 19:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,960
Videos
≈29
Links
≈1,080
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 03s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
44,654 reactions across 156 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
26,051
58.3%
custom 5316768036085056352
7,720
17.3%
❤🔥
6,495
14.5%
🔥
2,033
4.55%
🥴
834
1.87%
👍
280
0.627%
🎉
195
0.437%
😍
153
0.343%
🤬
145
0.325%
👏
134
0.3%
🥰
120
0.269%
🤔
119
0.266%
😢
118
0.264%
🤯
63
0.141%
🤩
47
0.105%
😁
42
0.094%
🕊
41
0.092%
😱
34
0.076%
🙏
30
0.067%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 156 of the 156 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44,654 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 156 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 25 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
95
across the posts below
Posts paid on
26
of 156 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
21
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nvta_rc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 156 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 25 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Друзья, на наше счастье существуете вы — иначе что бы мы делали с этой кучкой алмазов, чашек и круток, которые так отчаянно хотим вам подарить? Правильно, страдали бы 🤭 А потому снова хотим всех поблагодарить за участие в ещё одном нашем мероприятии в честь нашего дня рождения — викторине, в которой мы в классическом формате нашей группы, кроссворде, вспомнили старые и новые новеллы, ставшие большой частью нашей с ва…
Кажется, в #Рождённый_Тенью и #Рождённая_Солнцем ребята уже решили отмечать скорый Хэллоуин — и готовятся к празднику со всей тщательностью! Пока Эйдан выбирает фильмы, Эндрю заботится о еде, а Адриан и Илай отвечают за украшение дома, вырезая красивущие тыквы — каждый в своём стиле, мы решили вам дать возможность поразвлечься, и подготовили для вас новый интерактив, знакомый каждому с детства — найти десять отличий …
🔔🔔🔔 ВИКТОРИНА ЗАВЕРШЕНА 🔔🔔🔔
Сообщество НВТА начало свой путь в далёком 2019 году – тогда ещё не было Алмазных Лихорадок, выходило всего несколько историй, и мы могли копить на один алмазный выбор несколько дней подряд... 💎В этом была своя особая атмосфера, согласитесь? Спасибо нашим дорогим разработчикам, что не перестают улучшать Клуб Романтики, но не вспомнить то время и первые истории в наш День Рождения мы прост…
Пришла очередь для обновления альбомов и обсуждения новых серий #Сага_о_Грозах 🍂
— Обновлены пошаговые гайды;
— Обновлены гайды на романы;
— В гардероб главной героини добавлены новые образы.
Мы приближаемся к финалу истории, и вместе с этим какие-то вопросы получают свои ответы, а какие-то лишь закручиваются ещё сильнее. В этом обновлении случилось большое событие, к которому вели нас все 4 сезона, — подписание ми…
А мы продолжаем обновление альбомов и сегодня добрались до интригующей #Рождённый_тенью 🩸
— Обновлены пошаговые гайды;
— Готовится к обновлению гардероб главной героини, а также вскоре будут добавлены наряды фаворитов.
Жизнь мисс Конте нельзя назвать спокойной ни в прошлом, ни в настоящем. В ХIХ веке ей приходится пройти через допросы и суд, чтобы в итоге — по милости князя Августа — оказаться на свободе, но с усло…
Что может быть приятнее, дороже и лучше, чем возможность подарить подарок действительно любимому человеку? В данном случае это вы, наши дорогие друзья. Мы с радостью представляем вам итоги нашего «конкурса» и надеемся, что вы получили только положительные эмоции... Как минимум потому, что отпраздновали наш день рождения вместе с нами! Мы получили точно и именно по этой причине — потому что наш день рождения был с вам…
А вот и подарок от официального сообщества не только для нас, но и для всего фандома — #расписание_nvta_rc! Не будем долго томить, мы уже успели испытать предвкушение и оценить риски выспаться в день обновления 🫠 Какую историю собираетесь проходить вместе с нами в первых рядах, друзья? 🎀
💕День шопинга! Событие начнётся завтра в 4:00 по мск и продлится 24 часа.
Это возможность БЕСПЛАТНО пополнить ваш гардероб красивыми нарядами, причёсками, украшениями и макияжем 💄
⚠️ Напоминаем, «День Шопинга» не распространяется на наряды друзей, животных, комнаты и транспорт.
Опция «купить/взять всё» доступна.
Какие у вас планы, друзья?💜
🔔🔔🔔 Баловнина завершена! 🔔🔔🔔
Соскучились по нам?🤨
Признаемся, нашу апрельскую шалость мы помним до сих пор! И вот, дождавшись момента, пока взрослые уйдут отмечать день рождения нашего любимого НВТА, мы вновь пришли к вам поиграть! Ведь день рождения — детский праздник, а значит всё должно быть весело, ярко, и обязательно с подарками!
Переходите по ссылке, чтобы как следует надорвать животики в нашей новой ✨ШтУчКе…
Вы ждали? А мы сделали! Празднуем вместе с вами — предлагаем забирать призы, пока мы будем просто наблюдать за вашими счастливыми лицами ☺️💜
Всё, что от вас нужно – заполнить форму, в которой вы сможете указать !одно! необходимое число от 1 до 20 (в цифрах, пожалуйста – 1, 2 и т.д.)
Не все ячейки выигрышные, а те, что выигрышные, содержат в себе самые разные призы – так что надеемся, что мы сможем вас удивить, но не…
❤159❤🔥36custom 531676803608505635230🎉10🔥1🥴1
Showing the 12 most recent of 156 posts we hold for @nvta_rc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@nvta_rc edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 September 2026
Most recent edit
25 October 2026
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 220%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 184%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 227%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 163%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 156 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 25 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
L e V o i c e ♨️ Анастасия Филимонова @levoiceps · 4,112#63
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Рыцари Клуба Романтики @romance_club_knights · 43,805 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 29 August 2026
💎Алмазная Лихорадка 💙 Оповещения 🩷 Клуб Романтики @almaznayalihoradka · 44,176 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 28 August 2026
Повседневность. Творчество. Любовь. @historiesbynancy · 45,747 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026
Спойлеры с нами! @SpoilersAreWithUs · 77,334 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 August 2026
Тусовка у Реми✨ @remirc · 103,390 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 August 2026
Гайды Клуб Романтики @yghfgycouc · 110,041 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
Усы Урсы @ursas_whiskers · 24,879 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 14 September 2026
Коротко о Клубе Романтики @lediclubromance · 56,851 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 22 August 2026
Helen Play | Визуальные новеллы 🖤 @gameswithhelen · 66,000 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 21 August 2026
Ироке / Iroke @irokeclub · 214,108 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
Клуб Романтики — Мои Истории @official_romanceclub · 733,240 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 8 August 2026
♰︎ | Секрет небес — Реквием | Конец Вечности @heavens_secret_requiem · 33,755 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 3 September 2026
Сцены из визуальных новелл @ligaromantikov · 58,322 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 22 August 2026
Подслушано Клуб Романтики @tgpkr · 81,051 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 18 August 2026
F a c e l e s s ✨ @faceless_sr · 25,232 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 14 September 2026
Лига Мечтателей | Гайды и Прохождения @guides_lod · 27,318 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 September 2026
Алиса || КР🦊🍃 @aliccachtg · 59,469 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 22 August 2026
Seven hearts stories 💜Файлы|Гайды @sevenheartsstories · 45,683 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 28 August 2026
Критики Клуба Романтики @criticsrc · 19,000 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 3 October 2026
РСА & СН3 | Разбитое сердце Астреи | Секрет Небес 3 @astreasbrokenheart · 19,343 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 30 September 2026
Seven Hearts Stories – Визуальные новеллы @sevenheartsstoriesofficial · 91,308 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 August 2026
Твои мужики из Клуба Романтики @tmikr · 36,756 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 1 September 2026
Елена 🌹РСА @elena_k_rc · 39,461 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 30 August 2026
Выйди и зайди нормально @comein_okay · 27,603 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“На все твои алмазы | Ваши любимые гайды” (@nvta_rc), 65,463 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nvta_rc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
