Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Суета Клуба Романтики

Channel

Суета Клуба Романтики

@sueta_rc

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

41,474subscribers

-343 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001773632793
TypeChannel
Username@sueta_rc
DescriptionНа страже вашего хорошего настроения По рекламе: @vika_rybkina | @s_rc_bot Купить рекламу через биржу: https://telega.in/c/sueta_rc Страница РКН: https://clck.ru/3GCRSj
Created17 February 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/sueta_rc

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

41,07841,91241,4956 August 2026 — 41,817 subscribers7 August 2026 — 41,785 subscribers8 August 2026 — 41,751 subscribers9 August 2026 — 41,726 subscribers10 August 2026 — 41,692 subscribers11 August 2026 — 41,654 subscribers12 August 2026 — 41,622 subscribers13 August 2026 — 41,587 subscribers14 August 2026 — 41,546 subscribers15 August 2026 — 41,669 subscribers18 August 2026 — 41,653 subscribers19 August 2026 — 41,625 subscribers20 August 2026 — 41,603 subscribers21 August 2026 — 41,804 subscribers22 August 2026 — 41,912 subscribers24 August 2026 — 41,854 subscribers25 August 2026 — 41,868 subscribers26 August 2026 — 41,844 subscribers27 August 2026 — 41,798 subscribers28 August 2026 — 41,769 subscribers29 August 2026 — 41,733 subscribers30 August 2026 — 41,690 subscribers31 August 2026 — 41,632 subscribers1 September 2026 — 41,645 subscribers2 September 2026 — 41,617 subscribers4 September 2026 — 41,578 subscribers6 September 2026 — 41,471 subscribers10 September 2026 — 41,383 subscribers12 September 2026 — 41,305 subscribers14 September 2026 — 41,256 subscribers15 September 2026 — 41,234 subscribers17 September 2026 — 41,183 subscribers29 September 2026 — 41,078 subscribers5 October 2026 — 41,763 subscribers9 October 2026 — 41,746 subscribers13 October 2026 — 41,677 subscribers14 October 2026 — 41,689 subscribers15 October 2026 — 41,681 subscribers17 October 2026 — 41,666 subscribers18 October 2026 — 41,651 subscribers19 October 2026 — 41,628 subscribers20 October 2026 — 41,590 subscribers21 October 2026 — 41,579 subscribers22 October 2026 — 41,604 subscribers23 October 2026 — 41,616 subscribers24 October 2026 — 41,607 subscribers25 October 2026 — 41,579 subscribers26 October 2026 — 41,548 subscribers27 October 2026 — 41,754 subscribers28 October 2026 — 41,737 subscribers29 October 2026 — 41,727 subscribers30 October 2026 — 41,720 subscribers31 October 2026 — 41,692 subscribers1 November 2026 — 41,660 subscribers2 November 2026 — 41,626 subscribers3 November 2026 — 41,582 subscribers4 November 2026 — 41,545 subscribers5 November 2026 — 41,498 subscribers6 November 2026 — 41,474 subscribers41,4746 August 20266 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 92 days, net -343. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,953–42,037 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 15:4941,474-24
5 Nov 2026, 15:3941,498-47
4 Nov 2026, 15:1941,545-37
3 Nov 2026, 12:0941,582-44
2 Nov 2026, 13:1041,626-34
1 Nov 2026, 13:5641,660-32
31 Oct 2026, 13:1541,692-28
30 Oct 2026, 16:1041,720-7
29 Oct 2026, 14:3741,727-10
28 Oct 2026, 16:5641,737-17
27 Oct 2026, 15:0041,754+206
26 Oct 2026, 12:5041,548-31
25 Oct 2026, 13:4141,579-28
24 Oct 2026, 12:4041,607-9
23 Oct 2026, 15:5641,616+12
22 Oct 2026, 12:4041,604+25
21 Oct 2026, 08:1541,579-11
20 Oct 2026, 06:3641,590-38
19 Oct 2026, 04:3141,628-23
18 Oct 2026, 02:5641,651first reading

Engagement

465 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 193 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.9%
avg views ÷ 41,474 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,770
151 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
151
of 465 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held465 (3 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total870,690
Reactions total36,503
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 17:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈10,300
Videos
≈573
Links
≈742

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
16m 00s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

112,838 reactions across 464 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 545840374383588906043,20438.3%
❤34,03230.2%
custom 547012272531180145212,18010.8%
🔥6,3195.60%
custom 54631338299737024483,2522.88%
😭2,0571.82%
💔1,7961.59%
🤝1,6951.50%
😈1,4681.30%
custom 59200492012946101861,0930.969%
custom 61655972876753337169840.872%
custom 51973332848701685837700.682%
🤬7680.681%
😍6180.548%
😁4900.434%
custom 53075856107545650613410.302%
custom 50737915828476323203010.267%
custom 59312651433158934542960.262%
🎉2710.24%
💘2280.202%
7 further kinds6750.598%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 464 of the 465 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112,838 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 465 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 464 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sueta_rc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 465 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 151 posts held from the last 30 days (3.31%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 16:38 UTC≈1,620 views99 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

😊 @sueta_rc

custom 545840374383588906078😭13🤬6custom 53075856107545650612

6 Nov 2026, 15:05 UTC≈2,570 views147 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

💎 «Алмазная Лихорадка» на 48 часов стартует завтра в привычное время. Все бегом проходить РЛ1 по ветке с Саймоном! @sueta_rc

❤90custom 545840374383588906036custom 547012272531180145214🔥7

6 Nov 2026, 11:06 UTC≈4,580 views404 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

❗️Урса пишет Ставим ❤️, чтобы её идею утвердили @sueta_rc

custom 5307585610754565061339custom 545840374383588906036custom 547012272531180145224😈5

5 Nov 2026, 15:12 UTC≈5,030 views215 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Какую тему поставили? Делитесь в комментариях)

custom 5197333284870168583165custom 545840374383588906024🔥17custom 54701227253118014529

5 Nov 2026, 14:01 UTC≈4,840 views144 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 5458403743835889060103custom 547012272531180145222😈11custom 51973332848701685838

5 Nov 2026, 11:18 UTC≈5,100 views121 reactions3 Starsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Я забросила кр год назад из-за обилия новых двихуж(выгорела выбивать ачивки ради валюты на бесполезные карты). Думала отдохну, так нет, всякой мишуры только больше, все больше внимания надо уделять какой то ерунде, а не историям 😭 (Да, я знаю, что это не обязательно, но согласитесь, что если функцию ввели, то все равно рука тянется) Расскажите если тоже с таким столкнулись! Рубрика #мнения_подписчиков Отправить своё …

❤88🤝16custom 519733328487016858310custom 54701227253118014527

5 Nov 2026, 10:52 UTC≈4,940 views172 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥108😁41custom 519733328487016858318custom 52358771374282586935

4 Nov 2026, 18:44 UTC≈5,740 views184 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

я забросила кр где-то больше года назад. обновила и o×yeлa, сколько всего нового добавили. скажите, пожалуйста, честно, стоит ли возвращаться? я мягко сказать втри×уе от количества новых функций, нового оформления, нарядов и всего. расскажите, пожалуйста, люди добрые, стоит ли вернуться? или всё стало слишком сложным? я не понимаю блин ничего😭😭😭 будет здорово, если поделитесь мнением и своими ощущениями от всего. вс…

custom 5470122725311801452136custom 545840374383588906024custom 519733328487016858313custom 523587713742825869311

4 Nov 2026, 16:53 UTC≈5,700 views304 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Вспомним легенд @sueta_rc

custom 5458403743835889060260custom 519733328487016858320custom 523587713742825869316🔥8

4 Nov 2026, 16:09 UTC≈5,610 views175 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

❗️Календарь наград для обладателей подписок ещё не готов, но скоро будет. Ждёте? @sueta_rc

custom 5458403743835889060129🤬25custom 519733328487016858314custom 52358771374282586937

4 Nov 2026, 14:03 UTC≈5,440 views112 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 545840374383588906074😭21custom 519733328487016858311custom 52358771374282586936

4 Nov 2026, 10:48 UTC≈5,860 views241 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

👀 Вышло техническое обновление Появились графические темы для анкеты. Также добавился доп.способ получения ресурсов. Теперь вы можете играть в другие игры, выполнять задания партнёров и получать за это сокровища. ❗️Но будьте внимательны: среди предложенных вариантов встречаются сомнительные игры, которые мы, как админы СКР, рекламировать не собираемся. Если решите воспользоваться этой возможностью, советуем внимат…

custom 5458403743835889060174❤42custom 519733328487016858316custom 54701227253118014529

Showing the 12 most recent of 465 posts we hold for @sueta_rc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@sueta_rc edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 21 posts on @sueta_rc as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
46 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
7

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Nov 2026, 11:44 UTCAnonymous Poll1,310 voters approx.

Выбираем реальное событие

  1. Выбираем реальное событие28%
  2. Выбираем реальное событие25%
  3. Выбираем реальное событие31%
  4. Выбираем реальное событие16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTCAnonymous Poll1,410 voters approx.

Понравились ли вам финалы КПС?

  1. Да51%
  2. Нет49%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 465 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

caichat.ai
@caichatai · 541
5 posts
️️Romance Star️️ Еxclusive | Клуб Романтики
@honey_star_kr · 21,990
4 posts
Клуб категории Б
@clubkb · 8,032
3 posts
HDS | Школа 2D и 3D графики
@HDScg_bot · 11,681
3 posts
VNHub | Визуальные новеллы
@vn_hub · 1,658
2 posts
Ачиверы • Достижения Клуб Романтики
@achdkr · 23,614
1 post
💎Алмазная Лихорадка 💙 Оповещения 🩷 Клуб Романтики
@almaznayalihoradka · 44,108
1 post
Между приказом и тьмой || Раэль
@beterness · 596
1 post
𝑅𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝐻𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑠 | 𝑅𝐶
@fan_off_rk · 6,780
1 post
fasnthry
@fasnthry · 2,047
1 post
Дневник Каталины | РТ
@Katalinasdiary · 69
1 post
Lagerta — интерактивные истории
@lagertagame · 29,945
1 post
Сцены из визуальных новелл
@ligaromantikov · 58,312
1 post
Light and Night | Новости
@Light_And_Night_Official · 3,873
1 post
Аверрис: Дитя Разлома | ПТЛ&ВРС&ЭС Истории о любви | Клуб Романтики
@lovestories_rc · 11,283
1 post
Мальбонте | Вселенная Секрет Небес
@Malbonte_universe · 3,619
1 post
МОРОК | украшения
@mopok_club · 609
1 post
𝙾𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚠𝚢𝚗 🪶
@olliwyn · 87
1 post
О Красном и Безмолвном Море | БД | СТ | Wincy's Fantasy World | КР
@rc_hot · 5,991
1 post
Сеня Мур | Визуальные новеллы
@senya_murs · 20,544
1 post
Чёрный морозник | ТС & ТС2
@shadowssaintfour · 5,741
1 post
shurshata
@shurshata · 2,684
1 post
Психологи Watamota
@watamota · 11,779
1 post
Klara's Corner | Водяная Лилия | Клуб романтики
@waterlilycr · 4,618
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Критики Клуба Романтики
@criticsrc · 18,876
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 3 October 2026
Подслушано Клуб Романтики
@tgpkr · 80,771
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 18 August 2026
На все твои алмазы | Ваши любимые гайды
@nvta_rc · 65,190
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 21 August 2026
Гайды Клуб Романтики
@yghfgycouc · 109,459
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
Коротко о Клубе Романтики
@lediclubromance · 56,478
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 22 August 2026
Ироке / Iroke
@irokeclub · 214,096
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
Helen Play | Визуальные новеллы 🖤
@gameswithhelen · 65,815
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 21 August 2026
Клуб Романтики — Мои Истории
@official_romanceclub · 731,205
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 8 August 2026
Алиса || КР🦊🍃
@aliccachtg · 59,341
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 22 August 2026
РСА & СН3 | Разбитое сердце Астреи | Секрет Небес 3
@astreasbrokenheart · 19,203
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 30 September 2026
Усы Урсы
@ursas_whiskers · 24,736
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 14 September 2026
Выйди и зайди нормально
@comein_okay · 27,405
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 September 2026
Seven Hearts Stories – Визуальные новеллы
@sevenheartsstoriesofficial · 93,181
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 August 2026
Тусовка у Реми✨
@remirc · 102,686
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 August 2026
Сцены из визуальных новелл
@ligaromantikov · 58,312
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 22 August 2026
BeautyLab
@beautylabss · 19,703
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 29 September 2026
F a c e l e s s ✨
@faceless_sr · 25,094
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 14 September 2026
Спойлеры с нами!
@SpoilersAreWithUs · 77,057
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 August 2026
Идеи для ежедневника
@oformlenie_dnevnika_bloknota · 27,322
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
бабские записки ✨
@girl_notess · 25,626
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 20 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Суета Клуба Романтики” (@sueta_rc), 41,474 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sueta_rc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.