Channel
@gojjammedia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,546subscribers
+292 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001701388843 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gojjammedia |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gojjammedia |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:56 | 8,546 | +8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 8,538 | +24 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:56 | 8,514 | +119 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 8,395 | +9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 8,386 | +15 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 8,371 | +16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 8,355 | +26 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 8,329 | +35 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 8,294 | +22 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 8,272 | +24 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 8,248 | -6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 8,254 | first reading |
95 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 33 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 95 (9 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 15,969 |
| Reactions total | 106 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
532 reactions across 77 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 157 | 29.5% | |
| 👍 | 89 | 16.7% | |
| 💊 | 40 | 7.52% | |
| 🤣 | 25 | 4.70% | |
| 🤨 | 22 | 4.14% | |
| 🤔 | 21 | 3.95% | |
| 🤡 | 18 | 3.38% | |
| 💔 | 17 | 3.20% | |
| 🥴 | 15 | 2.82% | |
| 💩 | 14 | 2.63% | |
| 😈 | 13 | 2.44% | |
| 🙏 | 12 | 2.26% | |
| 🌚 | 9 | 1.69% | |
| 🐳 | 9 | 1.69% | |
| 👾 | 9 | 1.69% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 1.32% | |
| 😴 | 7 | 1.32% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 1.13% | |
| 🌭 | 5 | 0.94% | |
| 👻 | 5 | 0.94% | |
| 12 further kinds | 32 | 6.02% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 95 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 532 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
እስኳድ የጎንደርን ፋኖ አመራሮችን ወደ ገደል እየከተተው ነው ‼️ የጎንደር ፋኖ (ሰሜን ጎንደር) አመራሮች ወደ ቀልባችሁ ተመለሱ ፣ወደ ጨፍጫፊ ብልፅግና ስትገቡ ምን ተሰማችሁ ፣4 ቀን ከሬሳ አጠገብ የሰነበተችዋ ህፃን የናንተ ልጅ አይደለችም? በየቀኑ ከነነፍሱ የሚቃጠለው የወለጋ አማራ የናንተ አይደለም ? በእውኑ ለወልቃይት የምትቆረቆሩት እናንተ ብቻ ናችሁ? የወልቃይት አማራ እና የወለጋ አማራ እንዴት ለያችሁት? ያሳዝናል ‼️ ከዚህ በላይ ባትበጠብጡ መልካም ነው :: የጎንደር ፋኖ መፍትሄው በእጃችሁ ነው ----****-- 1/ነባርና የተማሩ የፋኖ አመራሮችን ወደፊት አምጡ:: 2/ ከዚያ የውስጥ ችግሮችን አፅዱ ፣የሚዘረፈውን ህዝብ ፣የሚሰ…
❤1
ሕዝብን የማንቃትና የማደራጀት ስራዎች በወሎ ቤተ-አማራ ተጠናክረው ቀጥለዋል! የአፋብን ምኒልክ 1ኛ ዕዝ ከጠላት ነፃ ባወጣቸውና በተቆጣጠራቸው ቀጠናዎች ሕዝባዊ አደረጃጀት የመስራትና ማህበረሰቡን ፓለቲካዊ ትጥቅ የማስታጠቁ ተግባር በአናብስቶቹ የምኒልክ 1ኛ እዝ አመራሮች ተጠናክሮ ቀጥሏል። ምኒልክ 1ኛ ዕዝ ከተቆጣጠራቸዉ ወረዳዎች መካከል በሰሜን ወሎ ዞን ዉስጥ አንዱ የሆነዉ ዳውንት ወረዳ 011፣ 012 እና 013 ቀበሌዎች ጋር ህዝባዊ የንቅናቄ መድረክ በደማቅ ሁኔታ ተካሂዷል። በዚህ መድረክ በርካታ የቀጠናዊ ማህበረሰብ ተሳታፊ የሆነ ሲሆን በአማራ ሕዝብ የትግል አላማና ግብ፣ አሁናዊ የትግሉ ቁመና ፣ ስለ ትብብርና አጋርነት እንዲሁም ከሕዝቡ ስለሚጠበ…
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
አፋብን በላይ ዘለቀ 3ኛ ዕዝ ዳግማዊ ቴዎድሮስ 5ኛ ኮር ጎንደሬ በጋሻው ክፍለ ጦር ምስጋናው አጠኔ ብርጌድ በዳባት ዙሪያ ልዩ ቦታው 'በንከር' በተባለ አካባቢ ለቅኝት በወጣው የአድማ ብተና ኃይል ላይ ከፍተኛ ጥቃት ደረሰበት። ነሐሴ 22/2018 ዓ.ም ከጥዋቱ 1፡00 ሰዓት ከዳባት ከተማ ተነስቶ በደፈጣ ላይ በነበሩት የምስጋናው አጠኔ አባላት ላይ ድንገተኛ ጥቃት ለመሰንዘር የሞከረው የአድማ ብተና ስብስብ፣ እስከ ቀኑ 9፡00 ሰዓት ድረስ በተካሄደ ትንቅንቅ የጠላት ኃይል ሲቀጠቀጥ ውሏል። ልዩ የደፈጣ ስልት ቀይሰው ወደ ወገን ወረዳ እንዲገባ ያደረጉት ጥበበኞቹ ብርቱ ክዳቸውን አሳይተውታል። ከፍተኛ ጥቃት የደረሰበት ይህ ኃይል ከዳባትና ከገደብየ ከተሞች…
Photo, posted without a caption
እዝነትና እርሕራሔን ድምጥማጡን አጥፍቶ በነዚህ እምቦቅቅላ ህፃናት አንገት ላይ ሰይፍ የሚያሳርፍና በለጋ ገላቸው ላይ ጥይት የሚያርከፈክፍ አረመኔያዊ የገዳ ስርዓት! ሰብአዊነትንና ሰዋዊነትን ቅርጥፍ አድርጎ የበላውና ፍፁም ጨፍጫፊነትን፣ ወራሪነት፤ ሰልቃጭነትን፣ አውዳሚነትንና ደም መጣጭነት መርሁ ያደረገው የገዳ ስርዓትን እንደ ልዩ መገለጫቸው የሚቆጥሩ የኦሮሞ ፅንፈኛ ኃይሎች የአማራን ደም እንደ ዥረት እያፈሰሱት ነው። ሰው በጅምላ ተጨፍጭፎ ሀዘን ባጠላበት ወቅት እየጠበቀ "የአጋዘኖችና የድኩላዎች መሣሣት አሳስቦኛል" በሚል ጋዜጣዊ መግለጫ በመስጠት በሚዘባበተው አባ ገዳ ስም የተቋቋመው የገዳ ኮማንዶ ከመከላከያ ሠራዊቱና ሌሎች የክልሉ ታጣቂዎች ጋር በመቀናጀ…
❤2💊1😈1
🛑ሰበር ዜና የቋራ ኦሜድላ ክ/ጦር የአቋም መግለጫ ‼️ የድርኳዜ አጭቤዎችን የፎቶ ፖለቲካ ጠረፈኞቹ አቋማቸውን ቁርጥ በማድረግ የነሱ አካል እንዳልሆኑና ትክክለኛ አንድነት እስኪሰራ ድረስ ተጠሪነታቸው ቀጥታ ለአፋብን እንደሆነ አሳወቁ። የሸጋ ጌታቸውን የእርቅ ፎቶ ይዘው ኦሜድላን ጠቀለልን ላሉ የዮሐንስ ንጉሱ ጀሌዎች ኩምሽሽ ያደረገው መግለጫ እንደሚከተለው ይቀርባል። ‼️‼️‼️ ለአፋብን ፖሊት ቢሮ ለመላዉ የአማራ ህዝብ፤ ለመላ የኢትዩጵያ ህዝብ እና በውጭ ለምትገኙ የትግሉ ደጋፊዎች የቋራ ኦሜድላ ክ/ጦር 3 ዓመት ሙሉ ለአንድነት ሲሰራ የቆየ እና ጠላትን እያንቀጠቀጠ አይቀጡ ቅጣት እየቀጣ ቆይቷል አሁንም በማሰልጠንና በማስታተቅ የቡድን እና ዘመናዊ መሳሪዎችን…
❤5👍2🤔1
በቀን 21/12/2018 ሰበር የድል ዜና! ፊትአውራሪ ገበየሁ ክ/ጦር ታሪክ ሰራ አውላላ ከተማ የመሸገው 280 ጠላት ተደመሰሰ! የክ/ጦሩ አናብስቶች 1ኛ ሬጅመንት እና 2ኛ ሬጅመንት ''ሀ'' ቅርፅ በመስራት 1ኛ ሬጅመንት ምሽግ ሰባሪ 2ኛ ሬጅመንት አጥቂ በመሆን 3ኛ ሬጅመንት ከነጋዴባህር ሚመጣውን ጠላት በመዝጋት የክ/ጦሩ 5ኛ ሬጅመንት የሆኑት የቅማንት ፋኖወች ጠገነ ወለላው ሻለቃ ከገንድዋ የሚመጣውን ሀይል መሀመድ ተራራ ላይ ደፈጣ በመጣል ታሪክ ተሰራ! የተገኘ ድል:--2ዲሽቃ አንዱ ባለክሻፋ -2ብሬን -2አርባጎራሽ -123 ክላሽ -6ሳጥን የዲሽቃ ተተኳሽ -9ሳጥን የብሬን ተተኳሽ -10አስቃጥላ የክላሽ ተተኳሽ -16ከነትጥቁ የተማረከ -1ፓትሮል እና 2ኦባ…
🤡1
በጭፍጨፋ ቪዲዮች ስር
💊1😈1
በራያ ግንባር ሦስት የብልፅግና መከላከያ ሠራዊት አባላት አንድ እስናይፐር እና አንድ ክላሽንኮፍ መሣሪያ እንደያዙ ከስምሪት ቀጠናቸው በመጥፋት ፋኖን ተቀላቀሉ! በወሎ ቤተአማራ ቀጠና ራያ ግንባር ሦስት የመከላከያ ሠራዊት አባላት አንድ የቡድን መሳሪያ እና 1ክላሽን ኮፍ መሳሪያ በመያዝ በአፋብን 1ኛ ምኒልክ ዕዝ 102ኛ ኮርን ተቀላቅለዋል። ከጠላት የኮበለሉት የመከላከያ ሠራዊት አባላቱ 250 የክላሽ ተተኳሽ እና 200 የስናይፐር ጥይት ተተኳሽ እንዲሁም አራት ኤፍ ዋን ቦንብ በመያዝ ተቀላቅለዋል። የተቀላቀሉት የደቡብ ዕዝ 202ኛ ኮር 21ኛ ክፍለጦር 1ኛ ሻለቃ 1ኛ ሻምበል ቲም መሪ እና እስናይፐር ተኳሽ ደሳለ መልካሙ እና እሱ ያውቃል ታደሰ እንድሁም 1 …
🤣1🥴1
Photo, posted without a caption
ህዝባዊ መድረኮች በሁለት እጅ እነሴ ወረዳ ጎድር ሜዳ ቀበሌ ላይ በወቅታዊ ጉዳዮች ውይይት ተካሂዷል። ========================= ..ነሐሴ20//2018 ዓ.ም ለአማራ ህዝብ ሲሉ በዚህ ትግል መስዋት የሆኑትን ጎዶችን በማሰብ በሀይማኖት አባቶች በፀሎት የተከፈተ ሲሆን የአፋብን ቴወድሮስ 2ኛ ዕዝ 201ኛ ኮር 54ኛ ክ/ጦር በ2እጁ እነሴ ወረዳ ጎድር ሜዳ ቀበሌ ነሐሴ19/2018 ዓ.ም ከህዝብ ጋር የጋራ ውይይት ተደርጓል። ➺ በፍትህ አሰጣጥ ና የመልካም አስ/ር ➺በፀጥታ ዙሪያ ያሉ ችግሮችን በመለየት ➺የሐብት አሰባሰብን በተመለከተ ➺የወል መሬት አጠቃቀም በተመለከተ ➺የአፋብን ትግል ከየት ወደየት አሁን የደረሰበት ሁኔታ እና ህዝባዊ አ…
🤡1😴1
Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @gojjammedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AMHARA DAILY(AD)🟩🟨🟥🐅” (@gojjammedia), 8,546 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gojjammedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.