Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for $Gramhunters

Channel

$Gramhunters

@gramhunters

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,510subscribers

-159 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002466381260
TypeChannel
Username@gramhunters
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gramhunters

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,5109,6699,589.56 August 2026 — 9,669 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,669 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,648 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,640 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,628 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,593 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,578 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,569 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,556 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,546 subscribers5 September 2026 — 9,539 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,530 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,521 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,510 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net -159. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,486–9,693 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 21:159,510-11
14 Sept 2026, 15:399,521-9
10 Sept 2026, 17:209,530-9
5 Sept 2026, 06:179,539-7
1 Sept 2026, 21:349,546-10
30 Aug 2026, 00:439,556-13
26 Aug 2026, 14:079,569-9
23 Aug 2026, 09:049,578-15
19 Aug 2026, 13:139,593-35
16 Aug 2026, 03:179,628-12
12 Aug 2026, 22:459,640-8
9 Aug 2026, 14:129,648-21
6 Aug 2026, 02:509,669no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:009,669first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 1 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

168 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6840.5%
👍4325.6%
2313.7%
😁116.55%
🆒74.17%
🤯52.98%
🤔42.38%
🤣42.38%
💩21.19%
🙈10.595%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 21 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gramhunters. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 June 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC205 views20 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

💎 Telegram подал заявку на доменную зону .gram: если ICANN её одобрит, миллиарду пользователей обещают личные домены вроде durov.gram и сайты по одному промпту. Но у блокчейна своя история: в Gram DNS такие адреса уже давно существуют, и durov.gram там выкуплен задолго до этой заявки - за ощутимую сумму. Мы надеемся, что при запуске новой зоны Telegram не станет обнулять ранних энтузиастов, а цивилизованно выкупит

8👍5🤣4😁3

13 Jul 2026, 20:03 UTC518 views7 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🗓 Сегодня, 13 июля (681-й день эксперимента) ⛏ Добыто и продано 850 монет PRL по $0.40 на сумму $338.8 Купил 💎 304 210 GRM по средней $0.001113 на сумму $338.8 Итого добыто майнингом: 6 694 992 GRAM Средняя цена: $0.00267 Текущая цена: $0.00111 [0.0006987 TON] ⸻ 1️⃣ Mine and Hold: $18 662 [+$739] (+4%) 2️⃣ Mine and Sell: $17 923 [+$339] 3️⃣ Mine and buy $GRM: $7 265 [-$9 575] (-59.5%) @Gramhunters 🏴‍☠️ • GRA

🔥6👍1

9 Jul 2026, 18:50 UTC553 views7 reactionsread 29 August 2026

☀️ Сегодня, 9 июля (677-й день эксперимента) ⛏ С последнего отчёта добыл 711 PRL. Продал по $0.498 на сумму $354 Купил 💎 275 600 GRM по средней $0.001284 на сумму $354 Итого добыто майнингом: 6 390 782 GRAM Средняя цена: $0.00275 Текущая цена: $0.00128 [0.0007895 TON] ⸻ 📊 Финансовые показатели эксперимента: 1️⃣ Mine and Hold: $21 020 [+$3 435] (+19.53%) 2️⃣ Mine and Sell: $17 585 [+$354] 3️⃣ Mine and buy $GRM

👍51😁1

1 Jul 2026, 06:04 UTC545 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026

⌛ Обновление прошло успешно ✅ Добавлен новый PROP пул — rabbitminer.cc (fee 1%) Доходность майнинга через наш прокси выше 40 PRL/PH/сутки ⬆️ Для подключения: Основной (Россия) triple.hash2grm.com:3335 Дополнительный (Германия) eu.triple.hash2grm.com:3335 Мониторинг — https://triple.hash2grm.com/ Рекомендуемые майнеры: — TW 2.2.2* (fee 1.5%) — PCM (fee 2%) *На других версиях TW и на других майнерах не гарантиру

👍2💩1

1 Jul 2026, 05:05 UTC511 views7 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🗓 Итоги за Июнь 2026: Добыто майнингом 💎 1.144M GRAM ($GRM) на сумму $1925 Средняя цена — $0.00168 Средний объем майнинга в день — 38 133 GRAM ($GRM) (~$64) Баланс вырос до 6 115 182 GRAM ($GRM) ☺️ 📎 Предыдущий отчет (май) @Gramhunters 🏴‍☠️ • GRAM Dashboard 📊

🔥7

30 Jun 2026, 14:00 UTC434 views7 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Комиссия временно снижена до 1% 🔥 Продолжаем копать PRL с самым высоким показателем доходности на PH, а повышенный профит не забываем переливать в GRM. 🏴‍☠️ https://triple.hash2grm.com/

🔥4👍2💩1

22 Jun 2026, 16:50 UTC542 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🚀 Запустил прокси-пул для PEARL! Главная цель — выжать максимум доходности из майнинга PEARL на PROP-пулах. 🛠 На чём тестировалось и что поддерживает: Рекомендую: TW Pearl Miner (показал себя стабильнее всего в тестах). Также поддерживаются: lpminer, SRBminer и другие популярные майнеры. 📊 Результаты за последние 12 часов: Доходность с 1 PH составила ~ 43 PRL! Это выше, чем у любого отдельного пула в общей стати

👍71

9 Jun 2026, 10:56 UTC776 views14 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Домен s.gram был выигран в аукционе за 429 349 $GRM (~$700). Upd: Токены сожжены ✅🔥— https://tonviewer.com/transaction/08a9f2255a2e3328f67f729c573a69ae316019ffc9ecd129630ba4c7fc96b9c1 🏴‍☠️ GRAM Dashboard | Hash2GRM

🔥7🤯4🤔2👍1

7 Jun 2026, 18:27 UTC529 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

💎 durov.gram - лот в Gram DNS Domains Минимальная ставка: 999 999 TON В контексте ребрендинга TON → Gram это больше, чем домен. Это первый премиальный актив в зоне, которую только что вернули к жизни. Имя основателя экосистемы по максимальной цене - сигнал, что рынок уже оценил новый бренд. Ждём, кто откроет торги. Сам Дуров или крупный игрок, верящий в возвращение Gram? А как вы думаете, кто купит? 👇 Лучший

1😁1

6 Jun 2026, 20:21 UTC669 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🗓️ Сегодня, 6 июня (644-й день эксперимента) ⛏ Намайнил 1930 PRL и обменял на 💎 1.144M $GRM по курсу $0.00168 на сумму $1925. Итого добыто майнингом: 6 115 182 $GRM Средняя цена: $0.00282 Текущая цена: $0.00179 [0.001111 TON] И огромное спасибо за поддержку в размере 1 млн $GRM! Отправитель мне неизвестен. Часть из этой суммы уже была использована в проектах на $GRM. ⸻ 📊 Финансовые показатели эксперимента: 1️⃣

🔥12👍2🙈1

4 Jun 2026, 22:08 UTC805 views13 reactions4 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

⛏ В тестовом режиме запустил майнинг $GRM на видеокартах. @Hash2GRM_Bot Для участия потребуется кошелек GRM в сети TON (GRAM) и наличие видеокарты NVIDIA 20,30,40,50 серии Примерная доходность за сутки: RTX 3070 ~800 $GRM RTX 4070 ~1300 $GRM RTX 5070 ~1600 $GRM RTX 4090 ~3600 $GRM RTX 5090 ~4600 $GRM Новости и обсуждения проекта — https://t.me/+y1sJ-cXKcOs0N2Qy

6🔥4😁2🆒1

4 Jun 2026, 11:04 UTC494 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Поменяли тикер на 😀MEXC. https://www.mexc.com/ru-RU/exchange/GRM_USDT Смена тикера является техническим обновлением и не влияет на количество токенов, их распределение или права держателей. Проект продолжает своё развитие в штатном режиме.

🔥63

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @gramhunters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“$Gramhunters” (@gramhunters), 9,510 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gramhunters.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.