Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Гранатка — и точка

Channel

Гранатка — и точка

@granatkavr

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,645subscribers

-527 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001656401347
TypeChannel
Username@granatkavr
DescriptionВсе ссылки тут — granatka94.ru
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/granatkavr

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,6458,1727,908.57 August 2026 — 8,172 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,172 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,154 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,125 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,097 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,085 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,058 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,040 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,016 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,995 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,964 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,944 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,917 subscribers26 September 2026 — 7,860 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,828 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,776 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,759 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,747 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,736 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,720 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,714 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,697 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,679 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,658 subscribers8 November 2026 — 7,645 subscribers7 August 20268 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 93 days, net -527. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,566–8,251 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 20:007,645-13
5 Nov 2026, 06:207,658-21
2 Nov 2026, 13:567,679-18
30 Oct 2026, 07:507,697-17
27 Oct 2026, 15:517,714-6
24 Oct 2026, 16:457,720-16
21 Oct 2026, 11:187,736-11
18 Oct 2026, 15:167,747-12
15 Oct 2026, 08:577,759-17
11 Oct 2026, 21:387,776-52
5 Oct 2026, 02:147,828-32
26 Sept 2026, 09:227,860-57
15 Sept 2026, 11:417,917-27
12 Sept 2026, 03:177,944-20
7 Sept 2026, 12:207,964-31
2 Sept 2026, 18:467,995-21
30 Aug 2026, 14:188,016-24
27 Aug 2026, 05:158,040-18
24 Aug 2026, 06:368,058-27
20 Aug 2026, 16:528,085first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.1%
avg views ÷ 7,645 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,310
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held37 (21 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total13,109
Reactions total261
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 01:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,220
Videos
≈80
Links
≈385

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

952 reactions across 37 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤30031.5%
👍13814.5%
🔥10310.8%
🤣818.51%
🎉495.15%
😐414.31%
😨353.68%
🤨343.57%
🆒323.36%
😈303.15%
😍252.63%
🍌151.58%
🤔131.37%
🍓101.05%
😁90.945%
🫡80.84%
👀50.525%
😢50.525%
❤‍🔥40.42%
💔30.315%
8 further kinds121.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 952 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 37 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @granatkavr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (10.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 13:46 UTC409 views57 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Я сегодня официально стала тетей Гулей 🥹

❤54❤‍🔥2👍1

4 Nov 2026, 09:54 UTC922 views17 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Один из этих котиков был раскрашен акриловыми маркерами, а другой напечатан сразу цветным пластиком. Какой получился лучше? 🔗 https://youtube.com/shorts/drvZcfIfFEI

❤16🆒1

3 Nov 2026, 12:21 UTC991 views11 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Обновления, которые мы заслужили: 🎛 Винил-режим: массивное кольцо из анодированного алюминия. Его можно крутить туда-сюда, имитируя скретчинг настоящей виниловой пластинки со всеми характерными звуками! 🗣 Свободные команды (ВПЕРВЫЕ!): можно забыть про обязательное «Алиса, сделай...». Можно просто буркнуть: «сделай потише», «звук на пять» или «минимальная громкость» — она поймет контекст. 🔊 75 Ватт звука: 8 активных …

🆒10❤1

3 Nov 2026, 12:19 UTC787 views14 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

✈️💸 Яндекс и BORK выкатили колонку по цене крыла самолёта Яндекс официально могнул: заколлабился с премиальным BORK и представил царь-колонку за 78 000 рублей! Да-да, это не опечатка. Пока все ждали Станцию Макс 2, бренды создали настоящего люксового монстра весом аж 5 кг! Продается Яндекс Станция эксклюзивно в бутиках BORK или магазине Алисы. Никаких унылых курьеров. BORK привозит новую Станцию на собственных Tesla…

🆒9😐4❤1

30 Oct 2026, 15:22 UTC≈1,010 views12 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Оказывается, не все повербанки с маркетплейсов пустышки на 1000 махов 🤯 🔗 https://youtube.com/shorts/812NQY_erQ8 Проверила вот этого кандидата с Озона и результаты очень порадовали: ✅ емкость совпадает с тем, что обещают на коробке ✅ заявленную мощность выдает, быстрая зарядка определяется На самом деле оказалось проблемой, чтобы его быстро разрядить, смартфоны все были заряжены, а другой подходящей нагрузки у мен…

👍11❤1

30 Oct 2026, 06:35 UTC≈1,130 views39 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Что я сейчас прочитала..🌚

🤣32🔥3😐2❤1🤬1

21 Oct 2026, 13:37 UTC≈1,660 views20 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

С кем еще не заколлабились Honkai:Star Rail? 🌚 Кто-то вообще в эту игру играет или у них такой агрессивный маркетинг по привлечению новых игроков? 🔗 https://youtube.com/shorts/uB0QJxGtZFs

🤨12👀5😱2❤1

18 Oct 2026, 08:07 UTC≈1,870 views48 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Обнаружен шпион

❤41😁5😈2

11 Oct 2026, 14:22 UTC≈2,210 views29 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Мой умный дом сегодня сходит с ума 😭😭😭

😐17🫡8😢3🤨1

11 Oct 2026, 14:22 UTC≈2,120 views14 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @yandexPhoto

Инфраструктура наших дата-центров повреждена, поэтому в работе сервисов Яндекса могут быть сбои. Специалисты делают всё возможное, чтобы как можно скорее всё починить. Повреждения также затронули работу службы поддержки. Если не удаётся связаться с нами через приложения, пожалуйста, пишите в официальные аккаунты сервисов Яндекса в соцсетях. Сейчас обращений много, поэтому ответ может занять больше времени, чем обычн…

🔥14

9 Oct 2026, 17:14 UTC≈1,760 views21 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

🤔 Сколько мне понадобилось времени от распаковки 3Д принтера до печати? 🔗 https://youtube.com/shorts/5nYSQ4zRsuA

🍌15❤4❤‍🔥2

9 Oct 2026, 12:11 UTC≈1,590 views41 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Делаем?😂

🔥32🤣7❤1👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @granatkavr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

POYA Kitchen!
@poyakitchen · 21,938
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Гранатка — и точка” (@granatkavr), 7,645 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/granatkavr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.