Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Gumunksveet

Channel

Gumunksveet

@gumunksveet

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,876subscribers

+76 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001737260586
TypeChannel
Username@gumunksveet
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gumunksveet

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,8007,8767,8386 August 2026 — 7,800 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,814 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,808 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,813 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,833 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,830 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,849 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,869 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,871 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,864 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,872 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,876 subscribers6 August 202613 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 38 days, net +76. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,789–7,887 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 04:007,876+4
9 Sept 2026, 15:597,872+8
4 Sept 2026, 04:007,864-7
1 Sept 2026, 04:137,871+2
26 Aug 2026, 08:267,869+20
23 Aug 2026, 03:077,849+19
19 Aug 2026, 07:587,830-3
16 Aug 2026, 14:487,833+20
13 Aug 2026, 05:297,813+5
10 Aug 2026, 07:557,808-6
7 Aug 2026, 01:477,814+14
6 Aug 2026, 10:467,800first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.2%
avg views ÷ 7,876 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,790
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 51 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held51 (30 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total98,660
Reactions total17,281
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

29,194 reactions across 51 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16,30555.9%
🔥6,14421.0%
💋1,9036.52%
🥰1,4905.10%
💅1,1273.86%
👀1,0543.61%
🤔2820.966%
🤨2080.712%
🎉1850.634%
👏1220.418%
😭1020.349%
😱1010.346%
💔560.192%
🤓500.171%
🤷‍♀280.096%
🤬230.079%
🤯80.027%
😡60.021%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29,194 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 51 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gumunksveet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 51 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC≈1,680 views568 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Если вселенная бесконечна, то существует версия семьи Смитов в Якутии😨 Да, внезапная Туйаара, мне кажется это ей больше подходит хд

420🔥86💋50💅11🎉1

28 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC≈2,070 views297 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Сахалар помогите 🚬 Какие имена были бы у персов «Рика и Морти» в якутской версии? Все таки существует бесконечное множество вселенных…иххих, может я что то рисую Конкретно у Рика, Морти, Бетт, Саммер и Джерри

222🤔50🔥24🎉1

27 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC≈2,710 views748 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Редрав легенды 👀 Смотрю сейчас «Ленор — маленькая мёртвая девочка». Словила вайбик, нарисовала

558🥰109🔥81

27 Aug 2026, 01:13 UTC≈3,020 views473 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Ребята, скоро открою комишки за РОБУКСЫ Я активно начала играть в роблокс, мне нужен скин 🤪

💋314😭9652🤯8🔥3

26 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC≈3,360 views800 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Photo

Я и кто?

💅546168🔥70💔9💋7

25 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC≈3,610 views362 reactionsread 28 August 2026

А кто-то тут делал лазерную коррекцию зрения от -7 😨? У меня астигматизм, разный минус -7 и -7.5. Благодаря вашим отзывам я пошла к психотерапевтке, хочу теперь до лазерки дойти

298🔥38👏26

25 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC≈3,960 views591 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Балуюсь

442🥰92🤓50🔥6💋1

25 Aug 2026, 02:29 UTC≈3,660 views283 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Кто-то в Якутске делал лазерную коррекцию зрения? Вы живы? Вы видите? Хочу на консультацию записаться за днях, страшно оч

🔥21066💅6👀1

23 Aug 2026, 22:53 UTC≈4,250 views475 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026

Мое желание сейчас чтобы кто-то заказал у меня комишку по РиМ 🫡 Чтобы я рыбку сьела и на

💅32695🔥54

22 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC≈4,740 views769 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Уверяю что рикорти тут никогда не будет. Расслабьте булки

553🔥120🥰68👏22🤬6

22 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC≈5,190 views880 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Yumeship final boss😨 Технически телу Рика Прайма 28 лет, так что под возраст попадает ихихих

👀516254🤨69🥰21💋20

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @gumunksveet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Kristina Kaspi
@KristinaKaspi · 25,900
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 13 September 2026
× ꉔꏂꀘ꓄ꋬ ×
@sektaKato · 34,518
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 6 September 2026
Олёша
@etoolesha · 29,530
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gumunksveet” (@gumunksveet), 7,876 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gumunksveet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.