Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FOCA • cosplay

Channel

FOCA • cosplay

@pressFoca

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

61subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002634521629
TypeChannel
Username@pressFoca
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pressFoca

Growth

5862609 August 2026 — 58 subscribers10 August 2026 — 58 subscribers17 August 2026 — 62 subscribers1 September 2026 — 61 subscribers619 August 20261 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 23 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 57–63 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 08:1361-1
17 Aug 2026, 12:1362+4
10 Aug 2026, 06:1658no change
9 Aug 2026, 02:0158first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

325 reactions across 9 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 8.31% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5361818691082139482278.31%
custom 5364162695253732413278.31%
custom 5206540127089751090206.15%
custom 5276072503695914016206.15%
custom 5422376626149163671175.23%
custom 5188276173800489591164.92%
custom 5249329451740706973154.62%
custom 5814358478570918411154.62%
custom 5445233072003902226134.00%
custom 5222143859240224713123.69%
custom 5312163242733229798113.38%
custom 5377829117980843825113.38%
custom 5195258545083271830103.08%
custom 5316868714413448088103.08%
custom 531926363542234888092.77%
custom 532340689588350757592.77%
custom 542263363699215507492.77%
custom 546783223213774170592.77%
custom 589760218178729140092.77%
custom 593608948251099853782.46%
11 further kinds4814.8%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 325 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC191 views41 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

💗🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 💗🌸🌸🤍🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🤍🤩 💗🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 💗🤍🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🤍 💗🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🐰 💗🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 💠💠💠💠💠💠💠💠💠💠💠 💙 у меня сегодня день рождения!! 💙 спасибо, что вы подписались и следите за моим творчеством, обнимаю 💙 лучший подарок для меня это ваша поддержка

custom 542237662614916367117custom 524932945174070697312custom 54226336369921550749custom 59362124946693239573

5 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC72 views34 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 544523307200390222613custom 53234068958835075759custom 59360894825109985378custom 52580286803654901403custom 52493294517407069731

4 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC72 views38 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 vid backstage 📷 by d_drgv

custom 518827617380048959116custom 531216324273322979811custom 58976021817872914009custom 52493294517407069732

2 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC81 views41 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

сегодня снимали милую мейд козочку 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ миллион и одна проблем преследуют, что, конечно, подбивает, поэтому не успела снять много контента, к сожалению… ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ спасибо помощнице за бэки 💙 фулл ждите на бусти (шучу (или нет))

custom 520654012708975109020custom 537782911798084382511custom 531686871441344808810

31 Jul 2026, 14:17 UTC88 views26 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

какая же водяница милашечка… оч хочется сделать ее 😈🤍

custom 53192636354223488809custom 53054580171001364447custom 53123496571987915817custom 54656645449635701833

28 Jul 2026, 16:23 UTC102 views26 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩 fairy, where are you going 光 全部集めて 君の明日照らすよ 🤩 🪄🪄🪄🪄🪽🤍🤍

custom 522214385924022471312custom 52246385179796618196custom 52224142360214440685custom 52247352621180030943

26 Jul 2026, 08:14 UTC116 views47 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

кто шляпку ворует??? 🤔

custom 536181869108213948219custom 536416269525373241313custom 527607250369591401611custom 52041707138916235194

25 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC110 views34 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

чета делается

custom 536416269525373241314custom 52760725036959140169custom 53618186910821394827custom 52966769221037193424

24 Jul 2026, 16:49 UTC208 views38 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

делюсь бэками первого сольного фотоса сниматься на улице для моего внутреннего социофоба было жоским тригером !!!нооо!!! поддержка моей замечательной помощницы и чудесного фотографа помогли пройти это мега испытание 🥹 а также большой приятностью стали люди, которые фоткались со мной и говорили добрые слова 😃

custom 581435847857091841115custom 519525854508327183010custom 54678322321377417059custom 52221083097959084933custom 53618186910821394821

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @pressFoca. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FOCA • cosplay” (@pressFoca), 61 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pressFoca.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.