По вопросам взаимодействия - @unchase
Авторский канал|Nomis / Aura co-founder | InfLake / Firewire founder | TechLead and crypto/AI researcher.
P.S. Any information I provide here is not a financial or any other advise.
Created
Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
110 average views per post against 262,220 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.042%. Across the 2,404 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,000–315,426 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.27% and 21.1%, with a median of 9.79%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (7 September 2026 – 7 October 2026)
Posts measured
153 of 172 published in the window (153 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
16,866
Mature posts only
0.044% over 122 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 7 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 60 days, net -25,427. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 258,406–291,461 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Oct 2026, 22:16
262,220
-3,235
27 Sept 2026, 15:39
265,455
-4,090
17 Sept 2026, 15:18
269,545
-803
15 Sept 2026, 12:36
270,348
-947
13 Sept 2026, 18:19
271,295
-771
12 Sept 2026, 02:21
272,066
-880
9 Sept 2026, 20:19
272,946
-1,557
6 Sept 2026, 13:41
274,503
-1,093
4 Sept 2026, 03:40
275,596
-594
2 Sept 2026, 20:13
276,190
-541
1 Sept 2026, 18:15
276,731
-583
31 Aug 2026, 16:04
277,314
-591
30 Aug 2026, 14:35
277,905
-379
29 Aug 2026, 11:26
278,284
-345
28 Aug 2026, 14:58
278,629
-589
27 Aug 2026, 11:25
279,218
-210
26 Aug 2026, 14:17
279,428
-553
25 Aug 2026, 11:03
279,981
-436
24 Aug 2026, 14:09
280,417
-890
22 Aug 2026, 19:27
281,307
first reading
Engagement
271 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 126 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.042%
avg views ÷ 262,220 subscribers
Avg views / post
110
153 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
172
of 271 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held
271 (13 June 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total
16,866
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Oct 2026, 21:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,430
Videos
≈91
Links
≈1,250
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
47m 37s
Average length
1m 05s
Measured directly from 44 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Брокер показывает одну доходность, Firewire — другую. Кто прав?
💶 Чаще всего дело в формуле. Пример из статьи: 100 тыс. ₽ выросли до 150 тыс., затем вы пополнили счёт на 1 млн, и рынок сразу просел на 10%. Простая формула от суммы пополнений покажет ≈ −5,9%, хотя сама стратегия принесла +35%. Firewire считает TWR, которая не зависит от вводов и выводов, и XIRR, которая учитывает их даты и суммы.
❓Другие причины:
•…
Можно ли сгенерировать видео с помощью ИИ на собственном компьютере — конечно да!
Open-source решение на базе MiniMax H3 под названием FreeVideo позволяет генерировать даже на видеокарте с 8Гб видеопамяти (вместе с 16Гб ОЗУ) 🔥
Работает внутри ComfyUI, в качестве референсов можно загрузить: текст, кадры начала и конца видео, картинки, аудио и видео. Скорость будет невысокая, зато локально.
Купили бумагу, а в Firewire её ещё нет? Скорее всего, дело в клиринге
Некоторые брокеры отдают сделку по API только после расчётов, а на бирже это может быть режим Т+1 — следующий рабочий день. В часы пиковой нагрузки реестр сделок у брокера может отставать ещё до 10–15 минут.
🔄 Как устроена синхронизация:
• по read-only API (БКС, Т-Инвестиции, Финам, Freedom Finance, JetLend) или загрузкой отчётов брокера;
• с хр…
Теперь и OpenAI внедряет в ChatGPT невидимые вотермарки в генерируемый текст, чтобы можно было определить, что он сгенерирован, а не написан человеком. Пока что только для пользователей из ЕС, но вряд ли надолго 🙈
Портфель в Firewire — не один счёт, а контейнер под вашу цель
💼 Можно завести отдельный портфель под ИИС, отдельный под спекулятивные сделки или вести общий семейный. При первом входе Firewire сам предложит создать вам первый портфель.
Сделки и остатки загружаются тремя способами:
• по API брокера с read-only токеном — самый быстрый путь;
• импортом отчёта из личного кабинета брокера — подходит для истории за прош…
Showing the 12 most recent of 271 posts we hold for @h2becrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@h2becrypto edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
30 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
4
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@h2becrypto named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@cryptoactu_fr named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 10 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@fedyavtone named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
@integral_investments named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
@pro100_crypto2 named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
DeBrief | Crypto News @de_brief · 202,526 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
Naija Profit Zone @Naija_free · 1,006,333 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Airdrop Watchers @AirdropWatchers · 25,940 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 11 September 2026
HODL, FUCK! @hodl_fuck · 102,354 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Airdrop ads @AirdropSnoopDogg · 141,855 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
E-Football Manager News @efootballmanagernews · 20,052 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 28 September 2026
Pumpers.tg @pumpers · 476,430 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 August 2026
WordBooX EN @WordBooX · 75,906 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
✍TRUTH CHANNEL🦅 @recoveryteamchannel · 19,255 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 2 October 2026
Где деньги Криптовски @kriptovsky_drop · 139,416 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Careermatters NG (Jobseekers Community) @careermattersng · 21,680 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 23 September 2026
Airdrop Update @sushiswapannounce · 21,830 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 22 September 2026
СкуфиТОН @tonskuf · 116,735 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
BITTON - Engage. Earn. Scale. @bittonapp · 333,137 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
Crypto Pulse Nigeria @Crypto_Pulse_Nigeria · 886,891 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
$PIGGY PROJECT @piggycoinsol · 107,930 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 September 2026
Crypto Millionaire News @CryptoMillionaireNews · 41,965 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
PAXGold Channel @PAXGold_Channel · 53,208 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
New Chain Alpha @NewChainAlpha · 47,632 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 7 September 2026
Banger Crypto Call @solmemecll · 47,088 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
moonasty @mooon_Nasty · 66,691 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
bookmaker.XYZ Announcements @xyzbookxyz · 151,792 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Airdrop Presents 🗽 @airdrop_Presents · 198,152 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
Naija Sports Hub @Naija_Sports · 848,150 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
18 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hard To Be AI” (@h2becrypto), 262,220 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/h2becrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.