Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for دکتر فرشاد هادیان‌فرد - شیمی کنکور

Channel

دکتر فرشاد هادیان‌فرد - شیمی کنکور

@hadianfard_chemist

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

169,686subscribers

+5,838 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001443289923
TypeChannel
Username@hadianfard_chemist
Description🟢 مسئول دپارتمان شیمی گروه ماز . . . 🟢 لینک صفحه اینستاگرام و آپارات من: https://takl.ink/F_hadianfard/ . . . 🟢 از طریق دایرکت مسیج کانال، میتونی حرفتو به من بگی
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hadianfard_chemist

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

158,000 average views per post against 169,686 subscribers — an engagement rate of 93.2%. Across the 1,133 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,135–315,832 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 1.86% and 8.91%, with a median of 4.43%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (23 August 2026 22 September 2026)
Posts measured21 of 21 published in the window (0 exact, 21 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled3,322,400
Mature posts only93.2% over 21 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers169,686 measured 17 September 2026
Cohortb100000:fas · 1,133 channels · p10 0.714% · p25 1.86% · p50 4.43% · p75 8.91% · p90 17.2%
Position in cohort99.735th percentile · 21.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.174% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 22 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

7171,60585,8066 August 2026 — 163,848 subscribers6 August 2026 — 163,963 subscribers8 August 2026 — 164,035 subscribers8 August 2026 — 164,268 subscribers9 August 2026 — 164,553 subscribers10 August 2026 — 166,604 subscribers11 August 2026 — 167,557 subscribers12 August 2026 — 168,297 subscribers14 August 2026 — 169,200 subscribers15 August 2026 — 169,900 subscribers16 August 2026 — 170,301 subscribers17 August 2026 — 170,868 subscribers18 August 2026 — 171,244 subscribers19 August 2026 — 171,605 subscribers20 August 2026 — 168,233 subscribers22 August 2026 — 165,538 subscribers24 August 2026 — 164,529 subscribers25 August 2026 — 164,821 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7 subscribers1 September 2026 — 167,643 subscribers2 September 2026 — 167,871 subscribers3 September 2026 — 168,088 subscribers5 September 2026 — 168,271 subscribers9 September 2026 — 168,554 subscribers11 September 2026 — 168,821 subscribers13 September 2026 — 169,015 subscribers15 September 2026 — 169,282 subscribers17 September 2026 — 169,686 subscribers169,6866 August 202617 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 42 days, net +5,838. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 07:21169,686+404
15 Sept 2026, 06:58169,282+267
13 Sept 2026, 13:39169,015+194
11 Sept 2026, 18:57168,821+267
9 Sept 2026, 05:59168,554+283
5 Sept 2026, 18:37168,271+183
3 Sept 2026, 17:00168,088+217
2 Sept 2026, 10:04167,871+228
1 Sept 2026, 07:27167,643+167,636
26 Aug 2026, 01:567-164,814
25 Aug 2026, 05:13164,821+292
24 Aug 2026, 04:04164,529-1,009
22 Aug 2026, 09:13165,538-2,695
20 Aug 2026, 21:33168,233-3,372
19 Aug 2026, 20:26171,605+361
18 Aug 2026, 19:29171,244+376
17 Aug 2026, 21:15170,868+567
16 Aug 2026, 22:22170,301+401
15 Aug 2026, 17:13169,900+700
14 Aug 2026, 02:38169,200first reading

Engagement

76 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 90 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
93.2%
avg views ÷ 169,686 subscribers
Avg views / post
158,000
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 76 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held76 (1 August 202620 September 2026)
Views total3,322,400
Reactions total96,640
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 02:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,490
Videos
313
Links
3,110

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 25m
Average length
17m 10s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

184,441 reactions across 76 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
147,15879.8%
🥴24,30213.2%
💔5,0652.75%
👍2,8101.52%
🤩1,4780.801%
🌚1,2260.665%
🍓1,0740.582%
🍾1,0350.561%
🎃2930.159%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 76 of the 76 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184,441 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
281
across the posts below
Posts paid on
39
of 76 we hold a reading for · 51%
Most on one post
65
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hadianfard_chemist. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 76 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 20 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Sept 2026, 15:07 UTC≈42,600 views623 reactions1 Starread 22 September 2026

دهمی‌ها، یازدهمی‌ها و دوازدهمی‌ها اگر از اون دسته دانش‌آموزانی هستید که قصد دارین از الآن شروع به درس خوندن کنین، ویدئو زیر رو ببینید! https://www.aparat.com/v/xudry32 توی ویدئو، از یک برنامه مطالعاتی حرف زدیم. این برنامه پیشروی رو هم میتونید در لینک زیر ببینید! https://t.me/hadianfard_class/1149

571🤩17👍12🌚8🍾8🍓7

20 Sept 2026, 06:53 UTC≈51,200 views633 reactionsread 22 September 2026
File

❌جزوه تست شبانه(QD) شیمی کنکور ❌شامل آزمون‌های جمعبندی همراه حل ویدئویی ❌شامل قیدنامه جامع شیمی کنکور حل ویدئویی جزوه توی آپارات قرار داره و میتونین ببینین! کانال تلگرام: https://t.me/Dr_hadianfard_shimi کانال آپارات و صفحه اینستاگرام: https://F-Hadianfard.yek.link

574🍓16🤩16🍾12🌚10👍5

17 Sept 2026, 09:01 UTC≈94,000 views1,880 reactionsread 22 September 2026

سلام در طول چند روز اخیر، اخبار خیلی عجیب و غریبی در رابطه با انتخاب رشته امسال، ظرفیت دانشگاه‌ها و حتی شهریه دانشگاه‌ها داره منتشر میشه! فعلا چیز قطعی نمیشه گفت تا روزی که دفترچه انتخاب رشته بیاد و متنش رو کامل بخونیم. به نظر میرسه که وزارت بهداشت، میخواد یک سیاست انقباضی رو در پیش بگیره و تغییراتی رو توی ظرفیت رشته‌های علوم‌پزشکی ایجاد کنه. خیلی از دانشگاه‌ها معتقدن در طول چند سال اخیر، ظرفیت‌ها بیش از حد بالا رف

1,570🌚169👍71🍾47🍓15🤩8

17 Sept 2026, 08:56 UTC≈89,600 views2,096 reactions1 Starread 22 September 2026

سلام به همه بچه‌های عزیزم! در طول هفته آینده، یعنی بازه ۲۸ شهریور تا ۳ مهر، کلاس‌های من تعطیل خواهد بود و شما در این بازه، فرصت مرور و جمعبندی تابستان رو خواهید داشت ✌️

1,880🤩106🍾45🍓30🌚22👍13

7 Sept 2026, 08:59 UTC≈184,000 views2,949 reactions12 Starsread 22 September 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

2,600👍138🤩70🍓56🍾56🌚29

7 Sept 2026, 08:39 UTC≈175,000 views1,179 reactions1 Starread 22 September 2026

از کلاس عقب موندی؟ ویس زیر رو گوش کن 👇 https://takl.ink/F_hadianfard/

924👍106🌚51🍓38🍾34🤩26

7 Sept 2026, 08:35 UTC≈174,000 views1,988 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

1,760👍73🍓52🍾49🤩29🌚25

7 Sept 2026, 08:18 UTC≈170,000 views880 reactionsread 22 September 2026

توی تست زدن کندی؟ ویس زیر رو گوش کن 👇 https://takl.ink/F_hadianfard/

721🌚51👍50🍓25🍾19🤩14

31 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC≈241,000 views3,120 reactions5 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

تا الان بیش از ۳۰۰ تا کارنامه با نمره‌های خفن بالای ۱۸ رو توی دایرکت مسیج کانال دیدم و این هنوز یک چهارم کارنامه‌هاتونم نیست! کلی از پیاما هنوز باقی مونده! از بین همه کارنامه‌ها، این از همش باحال‌تره 😂 گوشی رو از داخل چرخ گوشت بیرون اوردن قشنگ 😅✌️ واقعا لذت میبرم از حجم خفن‌ بودنتون 😍❤️ در بین کارنامه‌ها، سعی میکنم تا جایی که بشه به سوالاتتون هم جواب بدم حتما https://takl.ink/F_hadianfard/

2,650💔255🥴123🤩44👍29🌚19

29 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC≈197,000 views2,900 reactions1 Starread 22 September 2026

من از اینکه نمره‌هاتون برام میفرستین، خیلی ذوق می‌کنم براتون! اینکه توی سال به این سختی، تونستین از پس همه مشکلاتش بر بیاین، واقعا چیز بزرگیه و منو واقعا خوشحال میکنه! ما در طول سال تحصیلی قبل، سعی کردیم هرچی از دستمون بر میاد رو بذاریم و دیدن نمرات خوبتون، خستگی رو از تن من بیرون می‌کنه واقعا ❤️ هر نتیجه‌ای هست، قطعا حاصل تلاش خودتونه همیشه ✌️ اگر کنکوری هستین و احیانا حس می‌کنید نمره‌ای که گرفتین خوب نیست، کمی صب

2,630💔182🍓25🥴24👍22🤩17

28 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC≈188,000 views3,421 reactions1 Starread 22 September 2026

سلام! از عصر امروز تا به الآن، به روش‌های مختلف، چندین بار سایت مربوط به اعلام نمرات نهایی رو باز و بسته کردن هی! کاملا حق دارین بابتش استرس داشته باشین و اذیت بشین، ولی توصیه می‌کنم رهاش کنید و فردا اگر سایتشون پایدار موند، برید نمراتتون رو چک کنید! اگر نسبت به نمره مورد انتظارتون، نمره‌ای که گرفتین نهایتا تا حد ۰/۵ نمره هم تفاوت داشت، توصیه می‌کنم اعتراض نذارین چون امکان کم شدن نمره طی فرایند اعتراض وجود داره! اگ

3,080👍141💔135🥴34🍓16🍾15

26 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC≈185,000 views4,595 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

این یه دریچه مصنوعی قلبیه! اون قطعات فلزیشو خیلی وقتا از فلز تیتانیم میسازن! 😍✌️ https://takl.ink/F_hadianfard/

3,910🤩431🥴168👍31💔30🌚25

Showing the 12 most recent of 76 posts we hold for @hadianfard_chemist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTCAnonymous Quiz39,500 voters approx.

در قالب کنکور و امتحان نهایی، فکر می‌کنین رسم آرایش الکترونی عناصر تا چه عدد اتمی رو نیازه بلد باشید؟

  1. ۱۸4%
  2. ۳۶69%
  3. ۵۴13%
  4. ۸۶3%
  5. ۱۱۸11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 20 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“دکتر فرشاد هادیان‌فرد - شیمی کنکور” (@hadianfard_chemist), 169,686 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hadianfard_chemist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.