Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for دکتر فرشاد هادیان‌فرد - شیمی کنکور

Channel

دکتر فرشاد هادیان‌فرد - شیمی کنکور

@hadianfard_chemist

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

178,281subscribers

+14,433 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001443289923
TypeChannel
Username@hadianfard_chemist
Description🟢 مسئول دپارتمان شیمی گروه ماز . . . 🟢 لینک صفحه اینستاگرام و آپارات من: https://takl.ink/F_hadianfard/ . . . 🟢 از طریق دایرکت مسیج کانال، میتونی حرفتو به من بگی
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/hadianfard_chemist

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

112,000 average views per post against 178,307 subscribers — an engagement rate of 62.8%. Across the 1,134 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,071–316,044 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 1.83% and 8.77%, with a median of 4.23%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured28 of 28 published in the window (0 exact, 28 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled3,136,050
Mature posts only69.3% over 25 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers178,307 measured 5 November 2026
Cohortb100000:fas · 1,134 channels · p10 0.793% · p25 1.83% · p50 4.23% · p75 8.77% · p90 17.1%
Position in cohort99.029th percentile · 14.9× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.166% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

7178,35789,1826 August 2026 — 163,848 subscribers6 August 2026 — 163,963 subscribers8 August 2026 — 164,035 subscribers8 August 2026 — 164,268 subscribers9 August 2026 — 164,553 subscribers10 August 2026 — 166,604 subscribers11 August 2026 — 167,557 subscribers12 August 2026 — 168,297 subscribers14 August 2026 — 169,200 subscribers15 August 2026 — 169,900 subscribers16 August 2026 — 170,301 subscribers17 August 2026 — 170,868 subscribers18 August 2026 — 171,244 subscribers19 August 2026 — 171,605 subscribers20 August 2026 — 168,233 subscribers22 August 2026 — 165,538 subscribers24 August 2026 — 164,529 subscribers25 August 2026 — 164,821 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7 subscribers1 September 2026 — 167,643 subscribers2 September 2026 — 167,871 subscribers3 September 2026 — 168,088 subscribers5 September 2026 — 168,271 subscribers9 September 2026 — 168,554 subscribers11 September 2026 — 168,821 subscribers13 September 2026 — 169,015 subscribers15 September 2026 — 169,282 subscribers17 September 2026 — 169,686 subscribers26 September 2026 — 171,759 subscribers4 October 2026 — 173,087 subscribers9 October 2026 — 173,960 subscribers13 October 2026 — 175,933 subscribers14 October 2026 — 176,188 subscribers15 October 2026 — 176,458 subscribers16 October 2026 — 176,585 subscribers17 October 2026 — 176,658 subscribers18 October 2026 — 176,805 subscribers19 October 2026 — 176,928 subscribers20 October 2026 — 177,042 subscribers21 October 2026 — 177,151 subscribers22 October 2026 — 177,274 subscribers23 October 2026 — 177,330 subscribers24 October 2026 — 177,458 subscribers25 October 2026 — 177,557 subscribers26 October 2026 — 177,791 subscribers27 October 2026 — 177,869 subscribers28 October 2026 — 177,995 subscribers29 October 2026 — 178,087 subscribers30 October 2026 — 178,147 subscribers31 October 2026 — 178,196 subscribers1 November 2026 — 178,275 subscribers3 November 2026 — 178,324 subscribers3 November 2026 — 178,309 subscribers5 November 2026 — 178,307 subscribers6 November 2026 — 178,357 subscribers7 November 2026 — 178,281 subscribers178,2816 August 20267 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 93 days, net +14,433. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 07:56178,281-76
6 Nov 2026, 04:07178,357+50
5 Nov 2026, 01:01178,307-2
3 Nov 2026, 21:49178,309-15
3 Nov 2026, 00:37178,324+49
1 Nov 2026, 21:15178,275+79
31 Oct 2026, 20:27178,196+49
30 Oct 2026, 18:29178,147+60
29 Oct 2026, 18:08178,087+92
28 Oct 2026, 20:29177,995+126
27 Oct 2026, 19:46177,869+78
26 Oct 2026, 19:59177,791+234
25 Oct 2026, 16:50177,557+99
24 Oct 2026, 20:09177,458+128
23 Oct 2026, 18:38177,330+56
22 Oct 2026, 19:48177,274+123
21 Oct 2026, 16:08177,151+109
20 Oct 2026, 15:35177,042+114
19 Oct 2026, 12:00176,928+123
18 Oct 2026, 13:46176,805first reading

Engagement

115 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 186 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
65.4%
avg views ÷ 178,281 subscribers
Avg views / post
117,000
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 115 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held115 (1 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total3,265,700
Reactions total47,040
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 01:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,500
Videos
≈321
Links
≈3,150

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 28m
Average length
6m 50s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

253,770 reactions across 115 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤204,36980.5%
🥴24,3479.59%
👍9,2833.66%
💔5,0702.00%
🤩3,7871.49%
🌚2,5761.02%
🍓2,0850.822%
🍾1,9600.772%
🎃2930.115%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 115 of the 115 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 253,770 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 115 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
438
across the posts below
Posts paid on
60
of 115 we hold a reading for · 52%
Most on one post
87
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hadianfard_chemist. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 115 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (21.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 11:53 UTC≈32,400 views432 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026

🔴 تحلیل آزمون‌های این هفته ماز 🔴 شیمی پایه 12 ریاضی و تجربی https://aparat.com/v/adh691t شیمی پایه 11 ریاضی و تجربی https://aparat.com/v/khs4wad شیمی پایه 10 ریاضی و تجربی https://aparat.com/v/oaippgw

❤391🍾17🤩10🍓7🌚4👍3

5 Nov 2026, 20:29 UTC≈45,600 views852 reactionsread 8 November 2026
File

برنامه فشرده شروع از آبان، ویژه دهمی‌ها، یازدهمی‌ها و کنکوری‌ها! https://takl.ink/F_hadianfard/

❤768🤩46🌚13🍓10🍾8👍7

4 Nov 2026, 22:16 UTC≈55,600 views668 reactionsread 8 November 2026
File

آرزو داشتی کل درسای دو هفته رو شب آزمون فقط توی ۲ ساعت جمع کنی؟ 🥹 🔥 معجزه شب آزمون ماز اینجاست! امروز فقط کافیه دو ساعت وقت بزاری این جزوه رو بخونی بعدشم پیش آزمون رو بررسی کنی! آزمون جمعه ۱۵ آبان رو میترکونی ! 🚀💙

❤606🍾23👍15🌚12🍓6🤩6

4 Nov 2026, 22:02 UTC≈54,500 views1,947 reactions2 Starsread 8 November 2026
Video

😇✌️

❤1,820🌚54👍23🍓21🍾17🤩12

4 Nov 2026, 11:51 UTC≈59,600 views588 reactionsread 8 November 2026
File

فایل کامل فصل ۲ شیمی دهم از کتاب جمعبندی در ۲۴ ساعت شیمی ماز! در این فایل، کل نکات حفظی و مفهومی این فصل جمعبندی شده، ویژه آزمون این هفته ماز ✌️ اگه درس کلاستون به بودجه آزمون نرسیده یا میخواین مطالب رو مرور کنید، از این فایل استفاده کنید حتما https://t.me/hadianfard_chemist

❤549🤩12🌚8🍓7🍾7👍5

3 Nov 2026, 17:52 UTC≈62,700 views591 reactionsread 8 November 2026
File

معادله واکنش‌های شیمی دوازدهم https://takl.ink/F_hadianfard/

❤539🤩26🌚8👍7🍓6🍾5

3 Nov 2026, 17:50 UTC≈61,500 views378 reactionsread 8 November 2026

مصاحبه های رتبه های برتر کنکور ۱۴۰۵ رو می‌تونید از پلی‌لیست یوتیوب ماز ببینید 👇🏻 https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLSVW27t4_oVE&si=pwWWb0ZrsQm3gGrP

❤345🌚11👍9🍾7🍓4🤩2

29 Oct 2026, 20:04 UTC≈113,000 views5,003 reactions5 Starsread 8 November 2026
Video

پس خسته نشو، حتی اگه خیلی سخته 😊✌️ https://takl.ink/F_hadianfard/

❤4,440🤩343🌚85🍓67🍾50👍18

28 Oct 2026, 20:38 UTC≈107,000 views940 reactions2 Starsread 8 November 2026

فردا صبح، ساعت ۱۰ اولین جلسه کلاس حل تست پیشرفته بچه‌های کنکوری برگزار خواهد شد ✌️ https://takl.ink/F_hadianfard/

❤849🍾34🍓22🤩19🌚10👍6

23 Oct 2026, 17:14 UTC≈141,000 views708 reactions4 Starsread 8 November 2026

بررسی ویدئویی سوالات شیمی آزمون ۱ آبان ماز پایه دوازدهم: https://aparat.com/v/uftkg27 پایه یازدهم: https://www.aparat.com/v/cbifv30?refererRef=channel_page پایه دهم: https://www.aparat.com/v/gnq2w2v?refererRef=channel_page قسمت اول ویدئو رو حتما همه ببینید 😍✌️

❤660🍾18🌚10🍓7👍7🤩6

21 Oct 2026, 22:07 UTC≈124,000 views2,203 reactions2 Starsread 8 November 2026
Photo

مازمور یک روز با استاد هادیان فرد در یوتیوب منتشر شد😍 🎬لینک مشاهده ویدیو کامل از یوتیوب👇🏻 https://youtu.be/7d7HXo-Iw_Y?is=Le-zH-3OCPPVDKlz @biomaze

❤1,880🤩187🌚60🍾46🍓17👍13

21 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC≈149,000 views4,262 reactions2 Starsread 8 November 2026

یه وقتایی توی آینه به خودت نگاه کن! کی بودی، چی میخواستی، چه رویاهایی داشتی! ((الَّذِي أَحْسَنَ كُلَّ شَيْءٍ خَلَقَهُ)) آنكه هر چه را آفريد، به نيكوترين وجه آفريد! یه وقتایی باید یادت بیاد که کل دنیا، توی تصویر داخل آینه خلاصه شده ✌️😉 https://takl.ink/F_hadianfard/

❤4,070🍓48🌚46👍46🍾26🤩26

Showing the 12 most recent of 115 posts we hold for @hadianfard_chemist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@hadianfard_chemist edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
4 October 2026
Most recent edit
12 October 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 16 posts on @hadianfard_chemist as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
13 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
19 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTCAnonymous Quiz39,500 voters approx.

در قالب کنکور و امتحان نهایی، فکر می‌کنین رسم آرایش الکترونی عناصر تا چه عدد اتمی رو نیازه بلد باشید؟

  1. ۱۸4%
  2. ۳۶69%
  3. ۵۴13%
  4. ۸۶3%
  5. ۱۱۸11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 115 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“دکتر فرشاد هادیان‌فرد - شیمی کنکور” (@hadianfard_chemist), 178,281 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hadianfard_chemist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.