Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
49,400 average views per post against 63,724 subscribers — an engagement rate of 77.6%. Across the 3,427 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,643–99,874 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.07% and 11.2%, with a median of 5.16%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (23 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Posts measured
66 of 66 published in the window (0 exact, 66 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
3,262,500
Mature posts only
79.6% over 63 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 22 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net +12,283. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49,446–65,586 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 17:16
63,724
+333
17 Sept 2026, 05:18
63,391
+89
15 Sept 2026, 08:01
63,302
+29
13 Sept 2026, 16:59
63,273
-18
11 Sept 2026, 21:21
63,291
-11
9 Sept 2026, 12:57
63,302
-19
6 Sept 2026, 08:39
63,321
+21
4 Sept 2026, 01:54
63,300
-32
2 Sept 2026, 17:25
63,332
-1
1 Sept 2026, 17:54
63,333
-1
31 Aug 2026, 18:06
63,334
-8
30 Aug 2026, 20:57
63,342
+30
29 Aug 2026, 23:14
63,312
-13
28 Aug 2026, 23:54
63,325
+68
27 Aug 2026, 22:35
63,257
+22
26 Aug 2026, 22:23
63,235
+135
25 Aug 2026, 23:02
63,100
+234
24 Aug 2026, 23:04
62,866
+240
23 Aug 2026, 13:06
62,626
+1,775
22 Aug 2026, 01:27
60,851
first reading
Engagement
137 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 100 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
77.6%
avg views ÷ 63,724 subscribers
Avg views / post
49,400
66 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
66
of 137 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
137 (22 July 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
3,262,500
Reactions total
70,937
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 03:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
73
Videos
39
Links
139
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
41m 49s
Average length
20m 55s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
143,526 reactions across 137 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
88,149
61.4%
😁
33,917
23.6%
👍
10,418
7.26%
🔥
8,431
5.87%
🥰
2,611
1.82%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 137 of the 137 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143,526 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 137 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
دهمیها، یازدهمیها و دوازدهمیها
اگر از اون دسته دانشآموزانی هستید که قصد دارین از الآن شروع به درس خوندن کنین، ویدئو زیر رو ببینید!
https://www.aparat.com/v/xudry32
فولدر حل تمرین شیمی دهم ویژه بچههای دهمی
https://www.aparat.com/playlist/22145950
فولدر حل تمرین شیمی یازدهم ویژه بچههای یازدهمی
https://www.aparat.com/playlist/22145939
فولدر حل تمرین جزوات جامع ویژه بچههای کنکوری
https://www.aparat.com/playlist/21696620
یک سوالی رو خیلی از بچهها میپرسن، در رابطه با اینکه از ابتدای مهر مدرسه بریم یا نه؟!
❌ اول بچههای پایه!
در رابطه با دهمیها و یازدهمیها که جواب مشخصه! قطعا باید مدرسه برید، به کلاسهای مدرسه هم باید به چشم فرصتی برای مرور مطالب نگاه کنید.
❌ بریم واسه دوازدهمیا!
در رابطه با دوازدهمیها، خب شرایط یکم متفاوتتره! در کل، هرچقدر که یه دانشآموز کنکوری وقت آزاد بیشتری داشته باشه و بیشتر تست بزنه، موفقتر خواهد بود. اگ…
همه دوستان!
در طول هفته آینده کلاسی نداریم ولی هر روز، چی یادت نمیره؟ آفرین! تست تست تست تست تست و فقط تست!
هر روز و هر شب، تست! نه فقط شیمی بلکه همه درسا، فقط تست و تست و تست 😅
بچههای دوازدهمی!
در طول هفته آینده کلاس نداریم. جلسه بعدی کلاسمون، دوشنبه ۶ مهر برگزار خواهد شد. ما ۳ دسته دانشآموز داریم!
1⃣ بچههایی که مرتب با کلاس جلو اومدن و چیزی عقبماندگی ندارن! این بچههای کارهای زیر رو باید بکنن.
⏺ تستهای ۲۳۸۷ تا ۲۴۱۴ کتاب QB رو حل کنن.
⏺ جزوه رو تا جایی که درس دادیم بخونن و تمارینش رو حل کنن.
⏺ ویدئوهای بالا رو ببینن! تدریس فوق سریع و خلاصه مسائل محلولها هست. بعدا با جزئیات بهتون د…
❤661🔥18👍13😁7🥰4
Showing the 12 most recent of 137 posts we hold for @hadianfard_class. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 15 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
در واکنش تجزیه پتاسیم نیترات که منجر به توبید پتاسیم اکسید به همراه گازهای اکسیژن و نیتروژن میشود، پس از موازنه، ضریب گاز اکسیژن چند برابر گاز نیتروژن خواهد شد؟
۵6%
۲/۵63%
۳21%
۱/۵10%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
در کدام ترکیب، آرایش الکترونی آنیون و کاتیون مشابه هم است؟
آهن(III) اکسید9%
آلومینیم سولفید18%
منیزیم فلوئورید62%
پتاسیم نیترید11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 137 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مهدی عزیزی|معلم ریاضی @mahdiazizi_math · 58,300 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
انگلیسی به سبک استاد قیومی @alighayoomi_teacher · 97,607 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
4 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اطلاعرسانی کلاس شیمی دکتر هادیانفرد” (@hadianfard_class), 63,724 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hadianfard_class.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
