Channel
@haghayegheanunnaki
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
991subscribers
+31 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001879795317 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @haghayegheanunnaki |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/haghayegheanunnaki |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:42 | 991 | +12 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:41 | 979 | +8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:54 | 971 | +11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 960 | no change |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:30 | 960 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
11 reactions across 8 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
شاید برای این سوال بلخره یه جواب پیدا بشه. شاید حتی چند لایه جواب داشته باشه. شاید هم ذهن هنوز انقدر رشد نکرده که بتونه عمیق ترین جوابشو بفهمه. حتی ممکنه همیشه چیزی فراتر از توان فهممون باقی بمونه. ولی هر چی که باشه، خودِ سوال باز سر جاشه. و مهم تر از اون، زندگی هم همین حالا داره اتفاق میفته. ما بیرون از این جهان نیستیم که منتظر باشیم یکی بیاد و توضیح نهایی رو بهمون بده. خودمون بخشی از همین چیزی هستیم که داریم دربا…
Signed mehdi Warrior
خطرناک ترین جواب ها کدوما هستن؟ جوابایی که خیلی زود پیدا میکنیم. جوابی که ادعا کنه همه چیزو توضیح داده هر اتفاق عجیب و ناشناخته ای رو به نفع خودش تفسیر کنه و هیچ راهی هم برای رد کردنش باقی نذاره. چون اون دیگه تحقیق نیست یقینیه که فقط لباس تحقیق پوشیده. واقعیت ممکنه خیلی عجیب تر از چیزی باشه که الان فکر میکنیم، یا برعکس، ممکنه خیلی معمولی تر از تصور ما باشه. شاید بعضی رازهای بزرگ فقط نتیجه خطاهای ذهن ما باشن، شا…
Signed mehdi Warrior
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed mehdi Warrior
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed mehdi Warrior
چرا تو این چیزی که وجود داره، اصلا تجربه وجود داره؟ چرا یه کسی هست که میتونه این جهانو تجربه کنه و دربارش سوال بپرسه؟ اما این مسیر قرار نیست مثل یه نردبون باشه که از پایین شروع کنیم، پله پله بریم بالا و آخرش برسیم به یه جواب نهایی. بیشتر شبیه یه چرخست. جهان موجودات زنده رو به وجود میاره. موجودات زنده سیستم عصبی پیدا میکنن. سیستم عصبی امکان تجربه و آگاهی رو فراهم میکنه. آگاهی شروع میکنه به ساختن تصویری از جهان. بعد …
Signed mehdi Warrior
یه نکته مهم این وسط هست که نباید ازش غافل بشیم: حتی چیزایی که تا اینجا گفتیم هم نباید برامون تبدیل به حقیقت قطعی و دست نخوردنی بشن. نه گروه حقایق آنوناکی از این قاعده جدا هستن، نه این بنیادها و نه حتی همین تاپیک . چون ممکنه تمام این ایده ها، اسامی چارچوب هایی که کنار هم گذاشتیم، فقط راه هایی باشن که برای نزدیک شدن به واقعیت درست کردیم نه اینکه خودِ واقعیت دقیقا همین چیزایی باشه که ما تعریفش کردیم. ممکنه واقعیت خ…
Signed mehdi Warrior
حتی بیدار شدنم پایان مسیر نیست. ممکنه آدم بفهمه چطور باورا و شرطی شدنای ذهنی رو اون اثر میذارن اما بعد خودش یه باور جدید بسازه و دور همون باور زندگی کنه. ممکنه از یه مرجعیت فرار کنه ولی بعد کاملا تسلیم یه مرجعیت جدید بشه. حتی ممکنه کسی انقدر درگیر بیدار بودن بشه که همین هویت جدید، تبدیل به شرطی شدن جدیدی براش بشه. اینجاست که یه خطر جدی شروع میشه : یعنی وقتی هر چیزی که با باور ما مخالفه، تبدیل بشه به یه مدرکی علیه م…
❤2
Signed mehdi Warrior
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed mehdi Warrior
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed mehdi Warrior
اینجا بحث یه مقدار عجیب تر میشه. ما میدونیم که ما ناظر جهانیم، اما نباید از این واقعیت سریع نتیجه بگیریم که پس جهان حتما برای ما ساخته شده . شاید انسان واقعا جایگاه خاصی داشته باشه. شاید آگاهی، راهی باشه که جهان از طریق اون خودشو تجربه میکنه. شاید هوش یه مرحله طبیعی تو تکامل کیهان باشه. شاید حیات خیلی نادر باشه، شایدم تو کل جهان پر از حیات باشه فعلا کسی نمیدونه . همین نمیدونیم مهمه. چون صرف اینکه ما اینجا هستیم، ث…
❤1
Signed mehdi Warrior
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed mehdi Warrior
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed mehdi Warrior
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @haghayegheanunnaki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“حقایق آنوناکی” (@haghayegheanunnaki), 991 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/haghayegheanunnaki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.