درود بچههای سازماندهی به من پیام بدید. @mehrdadmaher3
🔥168👏26❤🔥16
Signed Mehrdad

Channel
@hamedanradio
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
37,642subscribers
-2,194 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001940267158 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hamedanradio |
| Description | ارتباط با ماهر اینجا راحت تره چون همه پیامارو با هم میبینم! https://t.me/hamedanradio?direct @mehrdadmaher3 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hamedanradio |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
32,700 average views per post against 37,642 subscribers — an engagement rate of 86.9%. Across the 3,408 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,643–99,874 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.03% and 11.1%, with a median of 5.14%.
| Window | 30 days (25 August 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 42 of 42 published in the window (0 exact, 42 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 1,373,730 |
| Mature posts only | 86.9% over 42 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 37,642 measured 17 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b31623:fas · 3,408 channels · p10 0.707% · p25 2.03% · p50 5.14% · p75 11.1% · p90 20.4% |
| Position in cohort | 99.501th percentile · 16.9× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.078% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Persian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 24 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:21 | 37,642 | -138 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:38 | 37,780 | -138 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 37,918 | -212 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 38,130 | +156 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 37,974 | +1,228 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 36,746 | -276 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 37,022 | -133 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:34 | 37,155 | -149 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:23 | 37,304 | -175 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 37,479 | -175 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 37,654 | -311 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:12 | 37,965 | -283 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:42 | 38,248 | -296 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 38,544 | -524 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 39,068 | -174 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 39,242 | -35 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 39,277 | -68 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 39,345 | -74 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 39,419 | -52 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 39,471 | first reading |
138 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 84 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 138 (1 August 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,345,230 |
| Reactions total | 18,555 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 00:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
54,603 reactions across 138 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 14,043 | 25.7% | |
| 🤣 | 11,209 | 20.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9,904 | 18.1% | |
| 👏 | 4,289 | 7.85% | |
| 😭 | 3,714 | 6.80% | |
| 💩 | 2,730 | 5.00% | |
| 🔥 | 2,029 | 3.72% | |
| 🤬 | 1,597 | 2.92% | |
| ❤ | 1,413 | 2.59% | |
| 💯 | 1,164 | 2.13% | |
| 😢 | 690 | 1.26% | |
| 🤮 | 375 | 0.687% | |
| 🤝 | 351 | 0.643% | |
| 😡 | 239 | 0.438% | |
| 🖕 | 226 | 0.414% | |
| 🤯 | 213 | 0.39% | |
| 😍 | 151 | 0.277% | |
| 💘 | 60 | 0.11% | |
| 🍾 | 54 | 0.099% | |
| 🤷♂ | 48 | 0.088% | |
| 10 further kinds | 104 | 0.19% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 138 of the 138 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54,603 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 138 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
درود بچههای سازماندهی به من پیام بدید. @mehrdadmaher3
🔥168👏26❤🔥16
Signed Mehrdad
جهت اطلاع مبارزین در رزن! 🔴رزن: الف: دوربینهای امنیتی محل هایی که رژیم دوربین امنیتی نصب کرده: ۱. بلوار معصومی الف:ابتدای بلوار معصومی (سه راهی دمق) جنب قنادی حاجیان:دوربین امنیتی داره. ب:انتهای بلوار معصومی که میره سمت دمق: دوربین امنیتی نصب شده. ۲.سه راهی قروه: الف:ابتدای سه راهی به سمت قروه ب: دویست متر جلوتر از سه راهی قروه به سمت قروه نبش باشگاه انقلاب ج: انتهای بلواری که سمت قروه میره نبش آرامستان رزن ۳. خی…
❤🔥358👏71🔥17
Signed Mehrdad
ساعت ۲ بامداد کد ۷۶۸ درود بر همگی دوستان عزیزم ببخشید که من کمتر ویدیو میذارم دلم خیلی براتون تنگ شده ولی اینجا خیلی دارم کار میکنم به خدا به جز چند ساعتی که کار میکنم بقیهاش ثانیهای نیست که برای آزادی مردم ایران تلاش نکنم.
❤🔥339😍22🔥10
Signed Mehrdad
برید آموزش ببینید! اگر بلد نیستید اتفاقا خوبه که رایگان آموزش ببینید! ممنونیم از جمهوری اسهالی بابت آموزش رایگان.
❤🔥368👏94🔥12
Signed Mehrdad
دوستان عزیزم که پیوی پیام دادید یکمی این روزا در حال پیگیری چند تا موضوع هستم نتونستم پیوی جواب بدم. یکطرفه پیامو پاک کنید من دو روز دیگه پیامارو میخونم و جواب میدم. ببخشید. ❤️❤️❤️❤️
❤🔥288👏33🔥13
Signed Mehrdad
قرار کور! با دقت ببینید! ذهنیتتون باید تغییر کنه!
❤🔥127👍27🔥8
Signed Mehrdad
قرار ملاقات کور برای کار میدانی! با دقت بخونید!
👏112❤🔥10🔥5
Signed Mehrdad
ارسالی 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 سلام ارادت آقا من تو شهرک صنعتی کار میکنم امروز دیدم پشت ماشین داشتن جعبه جعبه مهمات بود که میاوردن داخل شهرک صنعتی یه پادگان بغل شهرک صنعتی بوعلی هست از اونجا به نظرم داشتن مهماتو منتقل میکردن این حرومزاده ها تا باز شهرک صنعتیو به گا ندن ول نمیکنن فردا باز سربازان گمنام حضرت موسی بزنن خوار و مادرشون رو بگان میان اراجیف تحویل میدن دارو بوده، نمیدونم فلان بوده بهمان بوده سپاه خیلی مظلومه سپاه اصلا مادر…
👏208💯20😡14
Signed Mehrdad
برای تولید محتوا، ادیت، ساخت انیمیشن، ویدیوهای هوش مصنوعی هر کسی تواناییش رو داره لطفا توی دایرکت به من پیام بده. کار برای مردمه و بودجهای نداریم که هزینهای پرداخت بشه، اگر برای مردم بیمزد و بیمنت میخوای کار کنی پیام بده دمت هم گرم ❤️❤️❤️ @mehrdadmaher3
❤🔥289👏49😍8
Signed Mehrdad
مواردی که برای امنیت میدانی باید بدانید!
❤🔥155🔥13💯8
Signed Mehrdad
ویدیوی آموزش مقابله با سرکوبگران در خیابان
🔥169👏34❤🔥17
Signed Mehrdad
آموزش مقابله با سرکوبگران
🔥159👏26❤🔥16
Signed Mehrdad
Showing the 12 most recent of 138 posts we hold for @hamedanradio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@hamedanradio edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
امشب صداهایی که میاد صدای جنگندهاس یا مسافربری!!!
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 138 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مهرداد ماهر” (@hamedanradio), 37,642 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hamedanradio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.