India vs Newzealand All ready for 2nd T20 No Place of Mistake No Place of Excuse Sirf Jeet Aaj karenge Entry Ready rehna

Channel
HARSHAL GANDHI007
@harshalmsd07
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
212,076subscribers
+94,161 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001101083145 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @harshalmsd07 |
| Description | Telegram link https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEGhMgmVXaY12kTKVA Be aware from fake channels We never ask money from anyone By Direct message We dont have any other Telegram Channel Whatsapp and calling 8982365949 User name - @Harshalgandhimsd007 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 28 February 2018 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 48 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/harshalmsd07 |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 | 212,076 | -175 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 06:40 | 212,251 | -426 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:01 | 212,677 | -348 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 07:25 | 213,025 | -405 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:27 | 213,430 | -425 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 213,855 | -241 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 20:46 | 214,096 | -228 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:28 | 214,324 | -167 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 00:34 | 214,491 | -181 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 00:31 | 214,672 | -230 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 01:18 | 214,902 | -392 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 23:01 | 215,294 | -193 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 19:51 | 215,487 | -799 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 05:21 | 216,286 | -2,011 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 218,297 | -3,985 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 222,282 | -3,338 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 225,620 | -272 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 225,892 | -462 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 226,354 | -350 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:59 | 226,704 | first reading |
Engagement
128 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 166 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.47%
- avg views ÷ 212,076 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 13,700
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 128 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 128 (14 July 2026 – 24 October 2026) |
| Views total | 205,800 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Oct 2026, 16:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 138
- Videos
- 77
- Links
- 38
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 53s
- Average length
- 17s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Kal kafi din baad kaam Resume kia Bangla Kangla jesi hi Kheli 1st inning me sharjah me Anything above 230 is Good Total Lekin 2 Major collapse Kaam ni Bana Ab Enter hue hai to regular Active Rahenge India vs Newzealand ka Match hai Timing 12:30 hai after Toss milenge bhi aur Jeetenge bhi
2nd Entry 34 35 Afghanistan Fav now Bachi hui Limit ab Use karna Chota bhav hai fayda Milega Bangladesh Plus Karo Dono Entry done Hogi ab
1st Entry 62 63 Afghanistan Fav hai Maximum limit use Karo Afghanistan khana Hai Bangladesh win kariye Sabhi Ek Entry neeche bhav Milne pe aayegi Baki Maximul limit se Entry karo Bangladesh win karte Chalo
Bangladesh vs Afghan Odi Entry coming acha 👇 Match baega Acha Jeetke aana Hai
Pakistan vs England Odi Stats mene back up Channel me dediye hai Match me koi Entry kafi Sure lagi to Tip bhi Aayegi Join back up channel For Stats 👇 https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEGhMgmVXaY12kTKVA
ODI Tri Series Afghan Zimbabwe Bangla Pakistan Lanka England Yeh Dono series me hum Selected Matches karenge Limit Normal rakhna in Next 30 Days Int. Game hai Kaam Top Class dena mera kaam hai Lekin Hath normal limit Se Rakhna Jab heavy karna hoga me Inform Kardunga Active rehna Yeh Series Me Last humne Aus Rsa 2 Odi kare Dono Profitable Rahe the Harshal Gandhi 8982365949
Video, posted without a caption
Good Evening India Windies T20 Pakistan Lanka T20 Do Game hai kal Jo Better lagega wo yaha Karenge 1.5 Limit rakhiyega Sabhi
Good Back to Back Quality Matches for Us Last Int. Series thi England india isme T20 Odis dono me Acha kia tha Next few days sirf Int. Matches hai Har Tip Har post pe Dhyan rakhna Bhut kuch Jeetne ko Milega Harshal Gandhi 8982365949
Video, posted without a caption
2nd Entry 33 34 South africa Fav now Loss nil karlena Sabhi Africa pe plus Rakhna
Showing the 12 most recent of 128 posts we hold for @harshalmsd07. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@bettytips · 16,162#1
@Ranbirroydubai · 1,214,552#2
@baapu_predictions · 723#3
@AbirAhmad365 · 5,383#4
@sastidukaan · 2,868#5
@orignal_khan · 1,258#6
@RJABALPUR786 · 2,610#7
@akvking · 6,091#8
@vintageleakers · 22,897#9
@thejannatmannat · 64,666#10
@Devendrakothari · 3,280#11
@Khiladi1122 · 1,351#12
@Loadbeast · 325#13
@waseemsiddiqui · 5,006#14
@Nrtleaks786 · 28,035#15
@PayalJaipur · 38,034#16
@besttipsincricket · 31,701#17
@iamvsg · 1,204,705#18
@linecricketfast · 1,729#19
@TigerLine786 · 9,567#20
@princelineee · 6,682#21
@BadShahCricNEWS · 4,787#22
@cbtfsports365official · 2,052#23
@freetipsfootballthakkar · 1,276#24
@Ferrari_Bullet_Cricket_LiveLine · 18,756#25
@cbtfpay_official · 1,424#26
@Mohit70158 · 432#27
@nvbros · 368#28
@USDTlenden · 11,682#29
@Cbtf_Amit_Majithiya_Fixar_Real · 2,671#30
@RANBIRROYOFFICE · 2,445,663#31
@vsgline2 · 112,569#32
@jannat0405 · 9,915#33
@cbtfonlinebookofficial · 1,366#34
@cricketlinefree · 4,035#35
@Pardafash_Fraud_Expose · 172,891#36
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@thejannatmannat · 64,666
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 19 August 2026
@Ranbirroydubai · 1,214,552
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 8 August 2026
@vikramsinghgandhi_1 · 24,451
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 13 September 2026
@FreeCricketTips7 · 53,790
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 13 September 2026
@Baazigarbazigars · 24,373
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 14 September 2026
@Jahedking2 · 26,090
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 11 September 2026
@iamvsg · 1,204,705
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 8 August 2026
@phantombookofficial · 32,584
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HARSHAL GANDHI007” (@harshalmsd07), 212,076 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/harshalmsd07.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.